imagine getting a PhD in mathematics then trying to understand a paper surrounding Langlands Program

[futureashtray]

this is the average paper surrounding this topic

https://www.claymath.org/library/cw/arthur/pdf/11.pdf

also this one that is 158 pages long

https://arxiv.org/pdf/1201.6343

the most abstract of the abstract.

even a introductory paper is unreadable

https://projecteuclid.org/journalArticle/Download?urlId=bams%2F1183551573

at this point there are basically no numbers, just theorems, jargon, and basically just notation

“The behavior of the monodromy action on the nearby cycles functor applied to the intersection complex of a specific moduli stack of G-bundles over a curve, in the context of the p-adic geometric Langlands correspondence.”

to understand that sentence you need a fucking PhD. each term is not something you learn in a textbook, it’s something you spend years learning and mastering.

at this point the math can’t be imagined or something that can be understood if you follow the steps

there is no formula or anything as a tool to solve the problem

you imagine the tools, you imagine the problems, and you imagine the fucking solution. Then you have to prove it, and all that shit

holy shit bro, I thought trying to reading Google patents was difficult, this is impossible to understand without decades of understanding

 

[messi1]

why do you post it here?
it's good topic but i dont think org user will care about it