Incel phenotype discovered.

wrathcel

wrathcel

Fried by fluoride
Joined
Nov 19, 2024
Posts
14
Reputation
14
1000037629


Average "Incel" Phenotype. Made from 124 faces obtained from the Looksmaxxing Discord server's "rate-me" thread. Following is the average of Whitecels/Aryancels

1000037630

Average of Jeetcels (indians).

1000037631



Coverage from other races too low.

Surprisingly, the craniometric ratios and structures of the Incel averages are almost 100% constant across races (including in the low coverage, unreleased black and East Asian averages) which is contrary to global trends. Simply said, the phenotype is almost exactly the same. Interestingly enough, while a common phenotype is prominent, the White ones appear more appealing.

Work done by a mutual from telegram, any east asian or black incels send me their faces as he had a low amount from each. Anyone curious ask me for his tg @.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Mugwump, Debetro, wishIwasSalludon and 2 others
In hidden corners, quiet and deep,
A face emerges from the data they keep.
A thousand profiles, all bound by fate,
An average face they calculate.

The "Incel" born from coded streams,
A mask of sorrow, shattered dreams.
Eyes too distant, lips too thin,
A face that never fits right in.

In digital shadows, it’s unveiled,
A portrait of a soul, unassailed.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: vex, diditeverbegin, gofortheeyes and 1 other person
The problem with this is the fact you have facial averageness destroying the use of this data. It has been shown that average faces are more attractive. and when you look at these faces you posted, they don't look subhuman at all. However when you look at the individuals themselves, you will notice more subhumans for sure.

Not only that, the ratios cancel eachother out, making them average. which is most likely in line with the population.

i might even go out on a limb here to say that these faces are above average (high MTN)
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: mathis, redfacccee, diditeverbegin and 3 others
Not accurate
 
  • +1
Reactions: ronald_2
The problem with this is the fact you have facial averageness destroying the use of this data. It has been shown that average faces are more attractive. and when you look at these faces you posted, they don't look subhuman at all. However when you look at the individuals themselves, you will notice more subhumans for sure.

Not only that, the ratios cancel eachother out, making them average. which is most likely in line with the population.

i might even go out on a limb here to say that these faces are above average (high MTN)
Yes, but actually many of the faces were not subhuman.

The average face calculation result is always HTN/HMTN because it essentially gives 100% symmetry to a normie face with symmetry boosting attractiveness by 1-0.5 points above 5. The ratios being the same across races is not observed in other groups (see humanphenotypes.ent) which can be used to suggest that there is an incel phenotype/a genetic predisposition to inceldom that creates, on average, a certain facial structure across people groups. It also looks better because it's younger.
 
Last edited:
It should be good enough for calculating simply the phenotype

Yes, but actually many of the faces were not subhuman.

The average face calculation result is always HTN/HMTN because it essentially gives 100% symmetry to a normie face with symmetry boosting attractiveness by 1-0.5 points above 5. The ratios being the same across races is not observed in other groups (see humanphenotypes.ent) which can be used to suggest that there is an incel phenotype/a genetic predisposition to inceldom that creates, on average, a certain facial structure across people groups. It also looks better because it's younger.
survivors bias, the subhumans rope before they can be part of the data JFL
 
Also, where is the average phenotype of white and indians to compare with?
 
The only thing that changes between those is skin color. Everything else is the same.
 
Last edited:
The only thing that changes between those are skin color. Everything else is the same.
Ones has a little bit of shit under his nose from eating ass
 
  • JFL
Reactions: ronald_2
The only thing that changes between those is skin color. Everything else is the same.
White has taller ramus or outwardely grown gonion, thinner lips as well as thinner nose, pretty noticeable boyo.

indian darker eyebrows, how do you not notice that?

white has thicker neck also, brutal. Makes sense, when ethnic women say what they like about caucasian men, they often mention thin nose, thinner lips and thicker neck. BRUTAL ANDROGENPILL
 
Last edited:
there is no way that the average guy on looksmax dc is fucking nordic chico

@sportsmogger @wishIwasSalludon
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: sportsmogger, wishIwasSalludon and gofortheeyes
White has taller ramus or outwardely grown gonion, thinner lips as well as thinner nose, pretty noticeable boyo.

indian darker eyebrows, how do you not notice that?

white has thicker neck also, brutal. Makes sense, when ethnic women say what they like about caucasian men, they often mention thin nose, thinner lips and thicker neck. BRUTAL ANDROGENPILL
What you are discussing is mostly the fleshy parts of the face (IE lips, nose and neck). The underlying bone structure is almost identical, bar a slightly wider gonion in the White face. One would expect the White face to be lighter than the South Asian face, so I don't see why you mention this (in regards to eyebrowcolour), while something more significnat is that, bar colour, the eye areas are almost identical, with almost exactly the same eye WHR, general eye width and height, Canthal tilt, and eyebrow tilt. The minor differences observed are more than likely a result of data quality, rather than true difference.

For comparison, look at the phenotype averages on humanphenotypes.net. There is much cranio-facial variation between, for example, north atlantid and indid, rather than just facial variation (with little to no cranial variation), as observed in the incel phenotypes here.

North Atlantid and Indid attached for reference.
 

Attachments

  • northatlantidm.jpg
    northatlantidm.jpg
    14.2 KB · Views: 0
  • indidm.jpg
    indidm.jpg
    15 KB · Views: 0
unironically doesn't look that bad
 

Similar threads

yandex99
Replies
8
Views
1K
Maalik
Maalik
J
Replies
47
Views
3K
Sick
Sick
G
Replies
58
Views
10K
gonzalezcheis
G

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top