D
Deleted member 5815
all fictional scenarios and social experiment
- Joined
- Mar 16, 2020
- Posts
- 7,215
- Reputation
- 12,024
I’ve noticed that with some notable exceptions, incels are one of the only remaining groups who are feminist and actually care about women and see them as human beings, as opposed to the great majority of people. Incels are against the objectification of people and trivialization of relationships, not women. They don’t hate women, they hate what the modern woman and man represent.
Many claim that incels’ inability to get laid is due to their personalities, and they’re partly right: Their personalities don’t align with the promiscuity and degeneracy that is so prevalent in contemporary society. Asking incels to “improve” their personalities is nothing but asking them to psychologically morph into being able to objectify others as well as themselves, finally becoming part of the problem. They would rather remain single.
Many incels report that they get turned down by women because they love them too much, not because they hate women like the narrative painted in the ZOG media. What incels want is the ability to form meaningful, long lasting relationships where people are valued for the content of their characters, not superfluous traits rooted in vanity that assume people are tools or charms you may dispose of or trade once they serve no purpose.
Thus, in a society that pushes, upholds and actively enforces the idea of relationships being purely transactional as the gold standard, it makes sense that people advocating for long lasting, bonding relationships are seen as public enemy number 1.
Notice that ANYONE who criticizes incels meets at least one of these criteria:
a) Porn addict
b) Posts or comments on sexually degrading thirst traps regularly
c) Believes relationships are temporary
d) Promotes casual sex
e) Think it’s not cheating if there’s no feelings involved
Incels and femcels are in this together and fighting the same battle, a lot of pushback against the incel/femcel alliance is coming from failed normies (fakecels) who think the solution to being an incel is to become a normie and to fake everything about your personality and who you truly are.
Many claim that incels’ inability to get laid is due to their personalities, and they’re partly right: Their personalities don’t align with the promiscuity and degeneracy that is so prevalent in contemporary society. Asking incels to “improve” their personalities is nothing but asking them to psychologically morph into being able to objectify others as well as themselves, finally becoming part of the problem. They would rather remain single.
Many incels report that they get turned down by women because they love them too much, not because they hate women like the narrative painted in the ZOG media. What incels want is the ability to form meaningful, long lasting relationships where people are valued for the content of their characters, not superfluous traits rooted in vanity that assume people are tools or charms you may dispose of or trade once they serve no purpose.
Thus, in a society that pushes, upholds and actively enforces the idea of relationships being purely transactional as the gold standard, it makes sense that people advocating for long lasting, bonding relationships are seen as public enemy number 1.
Notice that ANYONE who criticizes incels meets at least one of these criteria:
a) Porn addict
b) Posts or comments on sexually degrading thirst traps regularly
c) Believes relationships are temporary
d) Promotes casual sex
e) Think it’s not cheating if there’s no feelings involved
Incels and femcels are in this together and fighting the same battle, a lot of pushback against the incel/femcel alliance is coming from failed normies (fakecels) who think the solution to being an incel is to become a normie and to fake everything about your personality and who you truly are.
Last edited: