Increase IPD in puberty?

[Magnum Opus]

I am comically slightly out of the 0.46-0.48 so called "ideal" range of IPD, and wanted to know if there are natural ways to minimally increase the IPD of an individual that is 85-90% done with puberty and 17 years old, so that I can have another checkbox ticked for facial aspects in the ideal ratio.
At the top off my head I'd expect that anything boosting testosterone or HGH will work as the IPD is determined by the bone width between the eyes and also the skull width itself, which would increase with higher T/HGH.
Thanks.

julianchicago

 

[HarrierDuBois]

I dunno but my IPD got better from 14-18 just from my face maturing and widening.

 

[Deleted member 16515]

not sure but I'll bump your thread because IPD seems like a shit failo. goodluck!

 

[Magnum Opus]

not sure but I'll bump your thread because IPD seems like a shit failo. goodluck!

0.01 out of the range isn't failo but thx

 

[gribsufer1]

lateral thumbpulling?

 

[Magnum Opus]

lateral thumbpulling?

Good suggestion, sounds like it'd work

 

[Magnum Opus]

not sure but I'll bump your thread because IPD seems like a shit failo. goodluck!

0.01 out of the range isn't failo but thx

my deviation of 0.01 could also just be a measuring fail but I'd rater be in the perfect 0.47s

 

[FrenchChad]

Good suggestion, sounds like it'd work

It slightly increased mine, the upper maxilla is very sensitive to palatal expansion when done young, so your orbitals will get wider increasing your ipd and most importantly your PFL.
It will enlarge the eyes from the outer canthus so in this case a higher pfl would give the illusion of wider eyes.
Also long eyebrows helps a lot, it makes your eyes appear wider.

 

[dadfa]

What's the best way of measuring your ipd?

 

[Deleted member 18361]

ipd isnt something you can grow

 

[Deleted member 21146]

What's ipd

 

[StrangerDanger]

No and anything to 0.445 is perfectly fine
below 0.44 it starts to become a problem

 

[Deleted member 22126]

No and anything to 0.445 is perfectly fine
below 0.44 it starts to become a problem

Is it worth getting a higher radix if you have average ipd since it would appear less with augmentation

 

[StrangerDanger]

Is it worth getting a higher radix if you have average ipd since it would appear less with augmentation

Depends on the individual
You will have to judge whether the trade off is worth it for your face. You ideally don’t want a shallow set radix but augmenting it can be detrimental to your looks due to the illusion of your eyes being closer and more deep set which can make your face look more beady

 

[Magnum Opus]

No and anything to 0.445 is perfectly fine
below 0.44 it starts to become a problem

 

[Deleted member 23554]

No and anything to 0.445 is perfectly fine
below 0.44 it starts to become a problem

how to measure it?

 

[StrangerDanger]

how to measure it?

IPD / Bizygomatic width

 

[Whatashame]

No and anything to 0.445 is perfectly fine
below 0.44 it starts to become a problem

absolute cope.

 

[StrangerDanger]

absolute cope.

and how many have you measured?

 

[Whatashame]

and how many have you measured?

bro if i have 0.46 and people here say i have low ipd, i cant even think about someone with 0.44

 

[Magnum Opus]

bro if i have 0.46 and people here say i have low ipd, i cant even think about someone with 0.44

Show your face here then

 

[StrangerDanger]

bro if i have 0.46 and people here say i have low ipd, i cant even think about someone with 0.44

Probably because you have other messed up ratios or low ipd with narrow skull

 

[Deleted member 2413]

Probably because you have other messed up ratios or low ipd with narrow skull
View attachment 1987879View attachment 1987883View attachment 1987884View attachment 1987885View attachment 1987886View attachment 1987888View attachment 1987889View attachment 1987890

What psl you give Zayn Malik, birdcell and Justin Bieber bhai

 

[Magnum Opus]

Probably because you have other messed up ratios or low ipd with narrow skull
View attachment 1987879View attachment 1987883View attachment 1987884View attachment 1987885View attachment 1987886View attachment 1987888View attachment 1987889View attachment 1987890

It's irrelevant anyways if a person is good looking. It makes no sense to see a gl person, and say "Y-your (insert facial feature)" is off of the ideal!
There are plenty features that would be considered failos but they're on supermodels. For example some ppl here think the gonial angle of Sean O' Pry is too high. But frankly, nobody gives a shit.

 

[Whatashame]

Probably because you have other messed up ratios or low ipd with narrow skull
View attachment 1987879View attachment 1987883View attachment 1987884View attachment 1987885View attachment 1987886View attachment 1987888View attachment 1987889View attachment 1987890

pretty good examples, i will pm my pic

 

[Whatashame]

Probably because you have other messed up ratios or low ipd with narrow skull
View attachment 1987879View attachment 1987883View attachment 1987884View attachment 1987885View attachment 1987886View attachment 1987888View attachment 1987889View attachment 1987890

The guy before pitt has a very high es ratio tho

 

[StrangerDanger]

What psl you give Zayn Malik, birdcell and Justin Bieber bhai

6-6.25
idk
5.75-6

The guy before pitt has a very high es ratio tho

its in the 0.445 range

 

[Whatashame]

6-6.25
idk
5.75-6

its in the 0.445 range

its 0.48 in the measurement i did

 

[Deleted member 16371]

6-6.25
idk
5.75-6

its in the 0.445 range

Zayn Malik is not 6 psl he’s 5.5 at best

 

[Deleted member 16371]

Zayn Malik is not 6 psl he’s 5.5 at best

Arvid mogs zayn Malik @StrangerDanger easily. Your ratings are weird

 

[StrangerDanger]

its 0.48 in the measurement i did

 

[StrangerDanger]

Arvid mogs zayn Malik @StrangerDanger easily. Your ratings are weird

Cope

 

[Whatashame]

View attachment 1987910

u clearly passed a lot in the lines lol

 

[Whatashame]

View attachment 1987910

 

[Deleted member 16371]

Cope

Same age

 

[Magnum Opus]

David laid has ~0.425 in this, and it's a non distorted front view picture

 

[StrangerDanger]

View attachment 1987923View attachment 1987924Same age

Non candid vs candid

u clearly passed a lot in the lines lol

the zygos doesnt stop cause he has sideburns on them

closer to 0.45 but
feel free to take more measurements his names jason lewis

 

[Magnum Opus]

View attachment 1987941

View attachment 1987943View attachment 1987946
David laid has ~0.425 in this, and it's a non distorted front view picture

@StrangerDanger do you think it's a failo on him?

 

[Deleted member 16371]

Non candid vs candid

the zygos doesnt stop cause he has sideburns on them
View attachment 1987950
closer to 0.45 but
feel free to take more measurements his names jason lewis

Yh your wrong. Arvid mogs candid or frauded

 

[StrangerDanger]

@StrangerDanger do you think it's a failo on him?

Slightly but irl no one cares

 

[Whatashame]

Non candid vs candid

the zygos doesnt stop cause he has sideburns on them
View attachment 1987950
closer to 0.45 but
feel free to take more measurements his names jason lewis

0.467

 

[Jigen]

I am comically slightly out of the 0.46-0.48 so called "ideal" range of IPD, and wanted to know if there are natural ways to minimally increase the IPD of an individual that is 85-90% done with puberty and 17 years old, so that I can have another checkbox ticked for facial aspects in the ideal ratio.
At the top off my head I'd expect that anything boosting testosterone or HGH will work as the IPD is determined by the bone width between the eyes and also the skull width itself, which would increase with higher T/HGH.
Thanks.

julianchicago

Would you guys consider a bit higher than avg IPD on a male a huge failo?

 

[StrangerDanger]

0.467

0.45 max

 

[Magnum Opus]

Would you guys consider a bit higher than avg IPD on a male a huge failo?

No one cares as long as you don't resemble sid

 

[Magnum Opus]

Measured wrong in pictures, I have 66mm IPD and a IPD to face width ratio of 0.47 Smilefuel