Indian smv was sky high from 1940- 70

D

Deleted member 23558

God make my neurotransmitters great inc
Joined
Nov 3, 2022
Posts
64,846
Reputation
91,085
40s because of Punjabis overrepresenting Indian military in ww2 and

50s-60s cause of new age hippie rediscovering india as the place for enlightenment traditionalism etc

You could say during some cases it was even on par with whites. Rn it’s lower than even vantablack somalis
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Kater Maxxing, Deleted member 23391, Debetro and 2 others
This was ideal looks in 60s if you wanted white women to obsess over you

1691616238989
 
  • Love it
  • +1
Reactions: Kater Maxxing and Arcturus
3342777 IMG 20230402 192236
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 23558
1691616435059


@MoggerGaston
 
All this is not sexual attraction but attraction through patriarchy (STATUS). But who cares, had sex.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 23558
All this is not sexual attraction but attraction through patriarchy (STATUS). But who cares, had sex.
When will you evolutionpilled types realize that culture and sex are deeply intertwined?
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 23558
Dune Movie Walk GIF by Warner Bros. Pictures

No god-king sex symbol avatar of shiva, he whom looks like krishna appeared to be like a force of nature on the scene to as an eternal icon for indian male sexuality and fertility.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 23558 and SidharthTheSlayer
Dune Movie Walk GIF by Warner Bros. Pictures

No god-king sex symbol avatar of shiva, he whom looks like krishna appeared to be like a force of nature on the scene to as an eternal icon for indian male sexuality and fertility.
?
 
Elaborate
Our conception of sex and attraction is also a cultural thing. The features we deem "objectively" attractive and fit for survival are also human constructs. Status makes you objectively attractive because it is a sign you as an individual have inherent worth in this society, which is also attractive to women to a similar extent as looks (which is another thing measured relative to civilizations)
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 23558
Our conception of sex and attraction is also a cultural thing. The features we deem "objectively" attractive and fit for survival are also human constructs. Status makes you objectively attractive because it is a sign you as an individual have inherent worth in this society, which is also attractive to women to a similar extent as looks (which is another thing measured relative to civilizations)
How is height(more force), good jaw(abililty to take hits), muscular body(strength), prominent browridge(protect eyes) human construct thing? Women will never prefer weakness even as much propaganda people do.
 
The west is the epicenter for worldwide notiery and aknowlegment, cant do anything when western media loves to meme by castig the most jfl indians men like aziz ansari etc in roles or fashion/modeling have these ogryncels on the covers when they do get a chance in the spotlight.
Vogue india 2019 july 01 single
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 23558
The west is the epicenter for worldwide notiery and aknowlegment, cant do anything when western media loves to meme by castig the most jfl indians men like aziz ansari etc in roles or fashion/modeling have these ogryncels on the covers when they do get a chance in the spotlight.
View attachment 2371868
Man I saw an insane griffith level high class brown dude in a shop nearby he had a shitty chin but his overall looks was insane. They should be trying harder to get the gl indians than just posting some fuckboy bearded pajeet
 
How is height(more force), good jaw(abililty to take hits), muscular body(strength), prominent browridge(protect eyes) human construct thing?
Some of these traits aren't even selected for in certain populations, why do you think Nords are so tall compared to Meds?
Why did classic Asian beauty standards differ from European ones?
 
Women will never prefer weakness even as much propaganda people do.
We are not living in an era of natural selection but SEXUAL selection
 
Some of these traits aren't even selected for in certain populations, why do you think Nords are so tall compared to Meds?
Why did classic Asian beauty standards differ from European ones?
Because nords picked height n both bred taller man and man preferred taller woman too. Meds may not have selected height compared to other traits. Classic asian beauty standards differ(prettyboy) only in movies. Can play romantic hero far better but its in movies. Irl i see masc gling guy slay far more. I live in east asia.

Refer to my this thread.

You will see its the masc pill here. Despite what they push in movies.
We are not living in an era of natural selection but SEXUAL selection
Yes and even in sexual selection. Female prefer strength.
 
Because nords picked height n both bred taller man and man preferred taller woman too. Meds may not have selected height compared to other traits. Classic asian beauty standards differ(prettyboy) only in movies. Can play romantic hero far better but its in movies. Irl i see masc gling guy slay far more. I live in east asia.

Refer to my this thread.

You will see its the masc pill here. Despite what they push in movies.

Yes and even in sexual selection. Female prefer strength.
Then you should know by now that culture and sex are deeply intertwined nigga! Not all traits are valued the same in every culture!
 
Then you should know by now that culture and sex are deeply intertwined nigga! Not all traits are valued the same in every culture!
How is it intertwined if all cultures prefer same traits?
 
It's actually true, also add bollywood (Khattris and Hindko pathans like Kapoors, Khannas, Deols, Dilip Kumar, Dev Anand)and those playboy princes/ nawabs (mainly Ksatriiya Rajputs) being lead representatives, along with what OP mentioned.

In fact in the 70s and early 80s Air India (Tata owned) was seen the way Cathay Pacific and Singapore Airlines are today, as the premier carrier globally, and even people on the flagship LHR - JFK route would pay more for the luxury, service, and food of air india rather than BA or AA.

It really got fucked up with 2 things:

1) 70s and 80s importing of mainstream cheap labour's to the west, which came from lower class rural areas - which was low caste 'north' indians

2) 90s to now importing of tech workers - which are of varying castes, but are aboriginal people with diet (grilled kebabs and tikkas are easy to palate, dosa sambar and pav bhaji, not so much) and culture much further removed from the west of the bollywood, nawabs, and military trope seen before.

Basically india was seen as high value because it was represented by the most appealing top 1% of people genetically and culturally, similar to how Korea is right now.

After that india got represented by a fair cross section of Indian society, which is subhuman.

Imagine what will happen when people realise Koreans all don't look like blackpink or BTS or Hyung Bae Kim and don't eat Korean BBQ and fried chicken everyday.

@BombayVikings
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 21700 and Deleted member 23558

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top