D
Deleted member 25190
DESHI BASARA
- Joined
- Jan 1, 2023
- Posts
- 789
- Reputation
- 693
On an average
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
THEN WTF IS DA POINT OH WAIT WE ARE MEDS GHAHHAHAHKek who said Iran Neolithic were ytbois
Not even all Aryans(so-called Yamnayas) were 100% white and many were infact brown-ish with brown eyes
Iran_N btw
View attachment 2181355View attachment 2181356
View attachment 2181358BMAC Uncle Chadpreet
I might be Iran_N shifted too
Nigger
Send the insta id of those two jbs you posted @waynebruce
half iranian, half african. A little bit of central asain genetics and some white genes. Lots of genetic diversity but then they fucked it up with arranged marriage and vegitarion diet.On an average
Half-Australoid, not Africanhalf iranian, half african. A little bit of central asain genetics and some white genes. Lots of genetic diversity but then they fucked it up with arranged marriage and vegitarion diet.
the first ones to come to india were african. then some of them moved to austrailiaHalf-Australoid, not African
AASI(so-called Ancient Ancestral South Indians) are not really similar to Sub-Saharan Africans as far as I know, AASI can be said Australoids since Australoid genes are just AASI genesthe first ones to come to india were african. then some of them moved to austrailia
yupAASI(so-called Ancient Ancestral South Indians) are not really similar to Sub-Saharan Africans as far as I know, AASI can be said Australoids since Australoid genes are just AASI genes
I read somewhere the Australoid theory was disproven or something, I dunno. It was fairly recent. Or it was about South Asians not being related to the Andaman Islanders, I have no clue.AASI(so-called Ancient Ancestral South Indians) are not really similar to Sub-Saharan Africans as far as I know, AASI can be said Australoids since Australoid genes are just AASI genes
yes iran_n. chg, ane, aasi, ehg,
Onge(Andaman) is taken as proxy to AASI->Indian Hunter GatherersI read somewhere the Australoid theory was disproven or something, I dunno. It was fairly recent. Or it was about South Asians not being related to the Andaman Islanders, I have no clue.
Yeah and I read that it’s wrong despite everyone using it as a proxy. Can’t be bothered to find it because I’m not autistic like that.Onge(Andaman) is taken as proxy to AASI->Indian Hunter Gatherers
Many South Indian native tribes alive like Paniya show as much as 90% Onge component
AASI is close to Onge but less archaic
AASI also might have Denisovan admixture
Just tell em your med bhaiiSouth Asians do have ancient Iranian genetics. But I wouldn't deny being called Iranian if someone called me that, but that'd be misleading since I am Pakistani and not Iranian. Not to mention, ask any Iranian and they will tell you that we are different. We do have some of the same ancestors, I think. After all, Indo-Aryan and Indo-Iranian is basically the same thing, because "Aryan" means "Iranian."
No. I’m a proud South Asian.Just tell em your med bhaii![]()