S
Skullmaxxer
Iron
- Joined
- Jun 10, 2025
- Posts
- 247
- Reputation
- 162
The entire theory of Aryan supremacy done by Nazis and wignats is based on Indo-Europeans. It's supported by many people like wignats and Indians on this forum. However I have to disagree.
The main flaw of this supremacy theory is that it claims the 'Indo-European' race on linguistic lines rather than genetic ones. Just because African-Americans speak English, it doesn't make them Anglo-Saxon.
The Aryans/IE were a mix race, they were a mix of 3 relatively isolated or purer races that evolved separately which were Iran_n, ANE and WHG. With 87.5% of their DNA coming from Asia.
So how is genetic superiority determined? Humans are naturally patriarchal and genes aren't stationary they mix or change by themselves. Genetic superiority and origins should be done based on y-dna and mt-dna origin populations, mainly y-dna though for solid non-variable answers.
The Indo-European marker or haplogroup R1, descends from R. It is a variation of R an independent y-dna from others though descendant from P. These are all descendants of haplogroup R which was found in Ancient North Eurasians. It is the most dominating or successful haplogroup. ANE are also patriarchs of Indo-Europeans.
New information also shows that IE languages may have originated from N. Mesopatamia or CHG but their lineage wasn't kept instead the patriarchs were EHG. This shows linguistics isn't genetics. The y-dna theory of mine for superiority is also supported by almost every culture globally in the form of surnames.
The original group with y-dna R is ANE or ancient north eurasian(in Siberia). Which is a more superior way to judge race than linguistics or any other shit. ANE surprisingly peaks in South Asia and Finno-Ugrics.
It peaks most in a few but not many Siberian groups at 40%, then Lapps and S. Asians including Pashtuns and Tajiks at 25(S. Indians)-35(N. Indians including UP, Gj etc. and E. Iranics)%. After that Nordics at 25%.
ANE in south Asians is actually under reported. For example there have been samples of E. UP Muslims that have upto 30% ANE.
Why is this? This is because ANE entered South Asia not only through steppe but also Indus Valley and Iranian Farmers which peaks in South Asians. ANE is higher in all parts of India except NE and is more than most of S. Europe or even Europe except Finns and Balts.
ANE Cranio structure was closest found to Harappan remains which increases their affinity to S. Asians. They had a very similar bone structure and also were the origins for Blonde hair. Meaning a race more closely related to S. Asia had origins for blonde hair that would spread into Europe.
Many white supremacists also call the ANE the Hyperboreans, but this makes India the most Hyperborean land alongside Finland.
ANE in South Asia is only low in E. Indians like Bengalis and NE Indians. ANE in most Indian regions isn't even affected that much by caste unlike Steppe.
It's truly over for wignats, Aryanists and Steppebros.
Why are they not promoting this? To promote Aryans who are still genetically closest to Nordics so they can keep their worldview.
In short, Aryans are linguistic not mainly genetic. Genetic patriarchs were ANE, ANE peaks in Finno-Ugrics and South Asians. ANE>Aryans.
ANE peaks in NW India and Afghanistan in Asia in Indus valley shifted groups or the true dravidians and steppe as well. Though not much difference is seen between North and South Indians.
ALSO I USED THE TERM ARYAN FOR ATTENTION, ARYANS WERE INDO-IRANIANS ONLY NOT INDO-EUROPEANS.
@Jattgymmaxx @Jason Voorhees @Lightskin Ethnic @ethnic subhuman @turkcelfatcel @Gengar @normal boy Call every race expert also @looksmaxxed @Looks over NT @LTNUser .
The main flaw of this supremacy theory is that it claims the 'Indo-European' race on linguistic lines rather than genetic ones. Just because African-Americans speak English, it doesn't make them Anglo-Saxon.
The Aryans/IE were a mix race, they were a mix of 3 relatively isolated or purer races that evolved separately which were Iran_n, ANE and WHG. With 87.5% of their DNA coming from Asia.
So how is genetic superiority determined? Humans are naturally patriarchal and genes aren't stationary they mix or change by themselves. Genetic superiority and origins should be done based on y-dna and mt-dna origin populations, mainly y-dna though for solid non-variable answers.
The Indo-European marker or haplogroup R1, descends from R. It is a variation of R an independent y-dna from others though descendant from P. These are all descendants of haplogroup R which was found in Ancient North Eurasians. It is the most dominating or successful haplogroup. ANE are also patriarchs of Indo-Europeans.
New information also shows that IE languages may have originated from N. Mesopatamia or CHG but their lineage wasn't kept instead the patriarchs were EHG. This shows linguistics isn't genetics. The y-dna theory of mine for superiority is also supported by almost every culture globally in the form of surnames.
The original group with y-dna R is ANE or ancient north eurasian(in Siberia). Which is a more superior way to judge race than linguistics or any other shit. ANE surprisingly peaks in South Asia and Finno-Ugrics.
It peaks most in a few but not many Siberian groups at 40%, then Lapps and S. Asians including Pashtuns and Tajiks at 25(S. Indians)-35(N. Indians including UP, Gj etc. and E. Iranics)%. After that Nordics at 25%.
ANE in south Asians is actually under reported. For example there have been samples of E. UP Muslims that have upto 30% ANE.
Why is this? This is because ANE entered South Asia not only through steppe but also Indus Valley and Iranian Farmers which peaks in South Asians. ANE is higher in all parts of India except NE and is more than most of S. Europe or even Europe except Finns and Balts.
ANE Cranio structure was closest found to Harappan remains which increases their affinity to S. Asians. They had a very similar bone structure and also were the origins for Blonde hair. Meaning a race more closely related to S. Asia had origins for blonde hair that would spread into Europe.
Many white supremacists also call the ANE the Hyperboreans, but this makes India the most Hyperborean land alongside Finland.
ANE in South Asia is only low in E. Indians like Bengalis and NE Indians. ANE in most Indian regions isn't even affected that much by caste unlike Steppe.
It's truly over for wignats, Aryanists and Steppebros.
Why are they not promoting this? To promote Aryans who are still genetically closest to Nordics so they can keep their worldview.
In short, Aryans are linguistic not mainly genetic. Genetic patriarchs were ANE, ANE peaks in Finno-Ugrics and South Asians. ANE>Aryans.
ANE peaks in NW India and Afghanistan in Asia in Indus valley shifted groups or the true dravidians and steppe as well. Though not much difference is seen between North and South Indians.
ALSO I USED THE TERM ARYAN FOR ATTENTION, ARYANS WERE INDO-IRANIANS ONLY NOT INDO-EUROPEANS.
@Jattgymmaxx @Jason Voorhees @Lightskin Ethnic @ethnic subhuman @turkcelfatcel @Gengar @normal boy Call every race expert also @looksmaxxed @Looks over NT @LTNUser .
Last edited:
