Inequality drives everything - Most people will never buy a house

[Seth Walsh]

Most people will never buy a house. Let’s cut the crap—it’s not about “hustling harder” or “cutting out avocado toast.” The system’s a meat grinder, and you’re the meat. Homeownership’s a pipe dream for the majority, and pretending otherwise is just cruel.

Owning a house isn’t just about having a place to crash—it’s asset ownership. Assets are like magnets for money. Once you’ve got one, it starts pulling in wealth: equity piles up, property values climb, tax breaks roll in. Meanwhile, the asset-less are stuck watching their cash vanish.

Renting? That’s just tossing your money into a bonfire. Every month, you’re handing over a fat check to your landlord—paying their mortgage, boosting their asset—while you walk away with squat. No equity. No appreciation. Just a temporary roof and a countdown to the next rent hike.

Here’s the kicker: no matter who you pay—landlord, bank, government—your money always ends up with the rich. They own the properties, the stocks, the companies. Your rent check? It’s funding some millionaire’s third vacation home. Your taxes? They’re bailing out corporations owned by billionaires. The system’s a conveyor belt to their pockets.

Think about it. Your paycheck hits, and where does it go? Rent. Utilities. Debt. Who’s on the other end? Property moguls, energy tycoons, Wall Street sharks. They’re the ones with the assets, raking in your cash while you’re left scraping by, praying for a raise that won’t even cover inflation.

Homeownership’s the golden ticket, but the game’s rigged. You’re not just up against rising prices—you’re battling hedge funds and ultra-wealthy investors snatching up houses like candy. They’ve got the cash, the connections, the power. You? You’ve got a 9-to-5 and a credit score that’s already wheezing.

Renting isn’t just expensive—it’s a stall tactic. Every year you’re stuck in that cycle, you’re falling further behind. No assets, no wealth magnet, no ladder to climb. You’re treading water while the rich sail off on yachts built with your rent money. It’s financial quicksand, and you’re sinking.

The “fix” people peddle—save more, work harder—is a sick joke. The wealth gap’s a chasm because it’s designed that way. Assets beget assets; poverty begets poverty. Most people won’t buy a house because most people can’t. The rich don’t just win—they’ve already won before you even roll the dice.

So here’s the brutal truth: without assets, you’re screwed. Renting keeps you broke, ensures you stay asset-less, and locks you out of the wealth game. Houses aren’t just homes—they’re the keys to the kingdom. And for most, those keys are dangling way out of reach.




"For to everyone who has, more will be given, and they will have an abundance; but from the one who has not, even what they have will be taken away."
This verse is part of the Parable of the Talents (Matthew 25:14–30), where Jesus illustrates the importance of stewardship and using one's gifts wisely. The principle is sometimes interpreted sociologically as the "Matthew Effect," describing how advantages or disadvantages tend to accumulate, leading to inequality (e.g., "the rich get richer, and the poor get poorer").

 

[Foreverbrad]

I could buy one but I don’t, incels don’t need a house and are better off living with their parents. Only reason to have a place of your own is to bring girls home .

 

[Seth Walsh]

I could buy one but I don’t, incels don’t need a house and are better off living with their parents. Only reason to have a place of your own is to bring girls home .

Why "girls" and not girlfriend?

 

[LancasteR]

 

[Foreverbrad]

Why "girls" and not girlfriend?

I’m too old to get any girls worthy of being girlfriend (virgin)

 

[trench]

Most people will never buy a house. Let’s cut the crap—it’s not about “hustling harder” or “cutting out avocado toast.” The system’s a meat grinder, and you’re the meat. Homeownership’s a pipe dream for the majority, and pretending otherwise is just cruel.

Owning a house isn’t just about having a place to crash—it’s asset ownership. Assets are like magnets for money. Once you’ve got one, it starts pulling in wealth: equity piles up, property values climb, tax breaks roll in. Meanwhile, the asset-less are stuck watching their cash vanish.

Renting? That’s just tossing your money into a bonfire. Every month, you’re handing over a fat check to your landlord—paying their mortgage, boosting their asset—while you walk away with squat. No equity. No appreciation. Just a temporary roof and a countdown to the next rent hike.

Here’s the kicker: no matter who you pay—landlord, bank, government—your money always ends up with the rich. They own the properties, the stocks, the companies. Your rent check? It’s funding some millionaire’s third vacation home. Your taxes? They’re bailing out corporations owned by billionaires. The system’s a conveyor belt to their pockets.

Think about it. Your paycheck hits, and where does it go? Rent. Utilities. Debt. Who’s on the other end? Property moguls, energy tycoons, Wall Street sharks. They’re the ones with the assets, raking in your cash while you’re left scraping by, praying for a raise that won’t even cover inflation.

Homeownership’s the golden ticket, but the game’s rigged. You’re not just up against rising prices—you’re battling hedge funds and ultra-wealthy investors snatching up houses like candy. They’ve got the cash, the connections, the power. You? You’ve got a 9-to-5 and a credit score that’s already wheezing.

Renting isn’t just expensive—it’s a stall tactic. Every year you’re stuck in that cycle, you’re falling further behind. No assets, no wealth magnet, no ladder to climb. You’re treading water while the rich sail off on yachts built with your rent money. It’s financial quicksand, and you’re sinking.

The “fix” people peddle—save more, work harder—is a sick joke. The wealth gap’s a chasm because it’s designed that way. Assets beget assets; poverty begets poverty. Most people won’t buy a house because most people can’t. The rich don’t just win—they’ve already won before you even roll the dice.

So here’s the brutal truth: without assets, you’re screwed. Renting keeps you broke, ensures you stay asset-less, and locks you out of the wealth game. Houses aren’t just homes—they’re the keys to the kingdom. And for most, those keys are dangling way out of reach.




"For to everyone who has, more will be given, and they will have an abundance; but from the one who has not, even what they have will be taken away."
This verse is part of the Parable of the Talents (Matthew 25:14–30), where Jesus illustrates the importance of stewardship and using one's gifts wisely. The principle is sometimes interpreted sociologically as the "Matthew Effect," describing how advantages or disadvantages tend to accumulate, leading to inequality (e.g., "the rich get richer, and the poor get poorer").

babe wake up new seth walsh thread dropped

 

[Lord Shadow]

Most people will never buy a house. Let’s cut the crap—it’s not about “hustling harder” or “cutting out avocado toast.” The system’s a meat grinder, and you’re the meat. Homeownership’s a pipe dream for the majority, and pretending otherwise is just cruel.

Owning a house isn’t just about having a place to crash—it’s asset ownership. Assets are like magnets for money. Once you’ve got one, it starts pulling in wealth: equity piles up, property values climb, tax breaks roll in. Meanwhile, the asset-less are stuck watching their cash vanish.

Renting? That’s just tossing your money into a bonfire. Every month, you’re handing over a fat check to your landlord—paying their mortgage, boosting their asset—while you walk away with squat. No equity. No appreciation. Just a temporary roof and a countdown to the next rent hike.

Here’s the kicker: no matter who you pay—landlord, bank, government—your money always ends up with the rich. They own the properties, the stocks, the companies. Your rent check? It’s funding some millionaire’s third vacation home. Your taxes? They’re bailing out corporations owned by billionaires. The system’s a conveyor belt to their pockets.

Think about it. Your paycheck hits, and where does it go? Rent. Utilities. Debt. Who’s on the other end? Property moguls, energy tycoons, Wall Street sharks. They’re the ones with the assets, raking in your cash while you’re left scraping by, praying for a raise that won’t even cover inflation.

Homeownership’s the golden ticket, but the game’s rigged. You’re not just up against rising prices—you’re battling hedge funds and ultra-wealthy investors snatching up houses like candy. They’ve got the cash, the connections, the power. You? You’ve got a 9-to-5 and a credit score that’s already wheezing.

Renting isn’t just expensive—it’s a stall tactic. Every year you’re stuck in that cycle, you’re falling further behind. No assets, no wealth magnet, no ladder to climb. You’re treading water while the rich sail off on yachts built with your rent money. It’s financial quicksand, and you’re sinking.

The “fix” people peddle—save more, work harder—is a sick joke. The wealth gap’s a chasm because it’s designed that way. Assets beget assets; poverty begets poverty. Most people won’t buy a house because most people can’t. The rich don’t just win—they’ve already won before you even roll the dice.

So here’s the brutal truth: without assets, you’re screwed. Renting keeps you broke, ensures you stay asset-less, and locks you out of the wealth game. Houses aren’t just homes—they’re the keys to the kingdom. And for most, those keys are dangling way out of reach.




"For to everyone who has, more will be given, and they will have an abundance; but from the one who has not, even what they have will be taken away."
This verse is part of the Parable of the Talents (Matthew 25:14–30), where Jesus illustrates the importance of stewardship and using one's gifts wisely. The principle is sometimes interpreted sociologically as the "Matthew Effect," describing how advantages or disadvantages tend to accumulate, leading to inequality (e.g., "the rich get richer, and the poor get poorer").

Fuck buying a house imagine being stuck in 1 place forever having to pay 400k for a 300k house because of interestn plus terest rates unpredictable. Could be paying 1000 per month, then 2000 per month like if you ever lose your job your absolutely fucked and its 30k upfront


Rent forever.

You get freedom + no risk + cheaper

 

[Seth Walsh]

Fuck buying a house imagine being stuck in 1 place forever having to pay 400k for a 300k house because of interestn plus terest rates unpredictable. Could be paying 1000 per month, then 2000 per month like if you ever lose your job your absolutely fucked and its 30k upfront


Rent forever.

You get freedom + no risk + cheaper

Rent forever = you lose the game of life.

For your argument to hold, one must assume stagnant rents, no desire for stability, and indifference to building generational wealth—a gamble few can afford as they age.

High cortisol at 60yo+ and no family are likely.


When you look into it. Private property (wealth/stability) is the main driver of monogamy and rearing children.



If you plan to rent forever, what benefits do you see? "Freedom + no risk + cheaper" is too vague.

Also, where I live, monthly rent payments are higher than monthly mortgage payments when property value is normalised. Also with mortgage payments you are slowly buying equity, with rent, you are on the losing side, paying money with nothing returned in the long run.


I would love to hear why you believe it is better.

 

[Lord Shadow]

Rent forever = you lose the game of life.

For your argument to hold, one must assume stagnant rents, no desire for stability, and indifference to building generational wealth—a gamble few can afford as they age.

High cortisol at 60yo+ and no family are likely.

If you're saving money how does any of this apply, if anything owning a house is more unstable. I'm open to changing my opinion but you'd have to explain where I was wrong or misunderstanding something

 

[Seth Walsh]

If you're saving money how does any of this apply, if anything owning a house is more unstable. I'm open to changing my opinion but you'd have to explain where I was wrong or misunderstanding something

How can you save money if you're renting? The average rent completely cancels out the average monthly wage nowadays before expenses.


Even if you saved all the money you made and didn't spend a penny (which is practically impossible due to transport, insurance, car tax & insurance petrol/diesel, mobile phone plan, food, clothes, anything else), it's unlikely you'd save 50% after rent.

Average monthly wage for a good white collar job is about €3750 before tax €2900 after tax. Renting a shared apartment costs minimum €1100, and it's increasing every few months. Add another +€400-600 per month for basic survival and transport. That's €1200 saved per month.

€14400 saved per year from a €45000 salary. This is assuming no college debt and no debt at all.

The purchasing power of money also lessens day by day. House prices and rent prices go up seemingly indefinitely, and have been for over a decade. You'd ideally want to be on the side of eventually owning a house, and having your payments going towards a mortgage, rather than into the ether.

There is a huge different in not having assets when you're older, and having assets when you're older. In fact it almost determines everything.

We live in an asset economy. Owning assets. Diversified basket of stocks, slowly buying a primary property, early pension contributions etc put you on the winning side of a rigged game. The assets make more money than your labour ever will.


Also if you want to rent forever. You will have to work forever to offset your rent payments. And in the end, you own nothing.

You can also lock in the interest rate at the time of taking out a mortgage. Not all mortgages are variable and exposed to interest rate changes.


Look at the economy as an ASSET ECONOMY. Would you rather own a property in monopoly, or pay rent to the owner for the whole game? It is the exact same in real life. Elapsed time makes it so much more brutal and you will feel it.

Asset owners always end up with more cash, more freedom, and the ability to buy more cash generating assets. The renters have to work harder and longer (and it's always in vain).


I feel you are looking at this idealistically. Maybe you are not renting currently, or paying a mortgage, or working full time? I don't know. I don't know your situation.

 

[Sprinkles]

Most people will never buy a house. Let’s cut the crap—it’s not about “hustling harder” or “cutting out avocado toast.” The system’s a meat grinder, and you’re the meat. Homeownership’s a pipe dream for the majority, and pretending otherwise is just cruel.

Owning a house isn’t just about having a place to crash—it’s asset ownership. Assets are like magnets for money. Once you’ve got one, it starts pulling in wealth: equity piles up, property values climb, tax breaks roll in. Meanwhile, the asset-less are stuck watching their cash vanish.

Renting? That’s just tossing your money into a bonfire. Every month, you’re handing over a fat check to your landlord—paying their mortgage, boosting their asset—while you walk away with squat. No equity. No appreciation. Just a temporary roof and a countdown to the next rent hike.

Here’s the kicker: no matter who you pay—landlord, bank, government—your money always ends up with the rich. They own the properties, the stocks, the companies. Your rent check? It’s funding some millionaire’s third vacation home. Your taxes? They’re bailing out corporations owned by billionaires. The system’s a conveyor belt to their pockets.

Think about it. Your paycheck hits, and where does it go? Rent. Utilities. Debt. Who’s on the other end? Property moguls, energy tycoons, Wall Street sharks. They’re the ones with the assets, raking in your cash while you’re left scraping by, praying for a raise that won’t even cover inflation.

Homeownership’s the golden ticket, but the game’s rigged. You’re not just up against rising prices—you’re battling hedge funds and ultra-wealthy investors snatching up houses like candy. They’ve got the cash, the connections, the power. You? You’ve got a 9-to-5 and a credit score that’s already wheezing.

Renting isn’t just expensive—it’s a stall tactic. Every year you’re stuck in that cycle, you’re falling further behind. No assets, no wealth magnet, no ladder to climb. You’re treading water while the rich sail off on yachts built with your rent money. It’s financial quicksand, and you’re sinking.

The “fix” people peddle—save more, work harder—is a sick joke. The wealth gap’s a chasm because it’s designed that way. Assets beget assets; poverty begets poverty. Most people won’t buy a house because most people can’t. The rich don’t just win—they’ve already won before you even roll the dice.

So here’s the brutal truth: without assets, you’re screwed. Renting keeps you broke, ensures you stay asset-less, and locks you out of the wealth game. Houses aren’t just homes—they’re the keys to the kingdom. And for most, those keys are dangling way out of reach.




"For to everyone who has, more will be given, and they will have an abundance; but from the one who has not, even what they have will be taken away."
This verse is part of the Parable of the Talents (Matthew 25:14–30), where Jesus illustrates the importance of stewardship and using one's gifts wisely. The principle is sometimes interpreted sociologically as the "Matthew Effect," describing how advantages or disadvantages tend to accumulate, leading to inequality (e.g., "the rich get richer, and the poor get poorer").

 

[JohnDoe]

I suspected you would not provide any solutions because i don't think there are any, atleast not for the majority of people. What a shame. I am a rentcuck.

 

[(In)CelibatePsycho2]

Most people will never buy a house. Let’s cut the crap—it’s not about “hustling harder” or “cutting out avocado toast.” The system’s a meat grinder, and you’re the meat. Homeownership’s a pipe dream for the majority, and pretending otherwise is just cruel.

Owning a house isn’t just about having a place to crash—it’s asset ownership. Assets are like magnets for money. Once you’ve got one, it starts pulling in wealth: equity piles up, property values climb, tax breaks roll in. Meanwhile, the asset-less are stuck watching their cash vanish.

Renting? That’s just tossing your money into a bonfire. Every month, you’re handing over a fat check to your landlord—paying their mortgage, boosting their asset—while you walk away with squat. No equity. No appreciation. Just a temporary roof and a countdown to the next rent hike.

Here’s the kicker: no matter who you pay—landlord, bank, government—your money always ends up with the rich. They own the properties, the stocks, the companies. Your rent check? It’s funding some millionaire’s third vacation home. Your taxes? They’re bailing out corporations owned by billionaires. The system’s a conveyor belt to their pockets.

Think about it. Your paycheck hits, and where does it go? Rent. Utilities. Debt. Who’s on the other end? Property moguls, energy tycoons, Wall Street sharks. They’re the ones with the assets, raking in your cash while you’re left scraping by, praying for a raise that won’t even cover inflation.

Homeownership’s the golden ticket, but the game’s rigged. You’re not just up against rising prices—you’re battling hedge funds and ultra-wealthy investors snatching up houses like candy. They’ve got the cash, the connections, the power. You? You’ve got a 9-to-5 and a credit score that’s already wheezing.

Renting isn’t just expensive—it’s a stall tactic. Every year you’re stuck in that cycle, you’re falling further behind. No assets, no wealth magnet, no ladder to climb. You’re treading water while the rich sail off on yachts built with your rent money. It’s financial quicksand, and you’re sinking.

The “fix” people peddle—save more, work harder—is a sick joke. The wealth gap’s a chasm because it’s designed that way. Assets beget assets; poverty begets poverty. Most people won’t buy a house because most people can’t. The rich don’t just win—they’ve already won before you even roll the dice.

So here’s the brutal truth: without assets, you’re screwed. Renting keeps you broke, ensures you stay asset-less, and locks you out of the wealth game. Houses aren’t just homes—they’re the keys to the kingdom. And for most, those keys are dangling way out of reach.




"For to everyone who has, more will be given, and they will have an abundance; but from the one who has not, even what they have will be taken away."
This verse is part of the Parable of the Talents (Matthew 25:14–30), where Jesus illustrates the importance of stewardship and using one's gifts wisely. The principle is sometimes interpreted sociologically as the "Matthew Effect," describing how advantages or disadvantages tend to accumulate, leading to inequality (e.g., "the rich get richer, and the poor get poorer").

No ur just a low iq lazy bum
I’m don’t have money either but I’m smart so I’m gonna get rich soon

 

[Seth Walsh]

No ur just a low iq lazy bum
I’m don’t have money either but I’m smart so I’m gonna get rich soon

Not lazy.

Good luck getting rich soon with no money currently!

 

[JohnDoe]

No ur just a low iq lazy bum
I’m don’t have money either but I’m smart so I’m gonna get rich soon

must be nice being 16 again thinking you can conquer the world and you'll become some rich multimillionaire. You're in for a rude awakening young man.

 

[asdvek]

this thread is super blackpilled and actual suicide fuel but seems like most faggots either dnr or too low iq to get it

 

[looksmaxxed]

all of this is caused by inflation, which is caused by adoption of jewish economic theories. every janitor in 1950 could afford a home after working for 5 years.

 

[albanianblackguy]

How can you save money if you're renting? The average rent completely cancels out the average monthly wage nowadays before expenses.


Even if you saved all the money you made and didn't spend a penny (which is practically impossible due to transport, insurance, car tax & insurance petrol/diesel, mobile phone plan, food, clothes, anything else), it's unlikely you'd save 50% after rent.

Average monthly wage for a good white collar job is about €3750 before tax €2900 after tax. Renting a shared apartment costs minimum €1100, and it's increasing every few months. Add another +€400-600 per month for basic survival and transport. That's €1200 saved per month.

€14400 saved per year from a €45000 salary. This is assuming no college debt and no debt at all.

The purchasing power of money also lessens day by day. House prices and rent prices go up seemingly indefinitely, and have been for over a decade. You'd ideally want to be on the side of eventually owning a house, and having your payments going towards a mortgage, rather than into the ether.

There is a huge different in not having assets when you're older, and having assets when you're older. In fact it almost determines everything.

We live in an asset economy. Owning assets. Diversified basket of stocks, slowly buying a primary property, early pension contributions etc put you on the winning side of a rigged game. The assets make more money than your labour ever will.


Also if you want to rent forever. You will have to work forever to offset your rent payments. And in the end, you own nothing.

You can also lock in the interest rate at the time of taking out a mortgage. Not all mortgages are variable and exposed to interest rate changes.


Look at the economy as an ASSET ECONOMY. Would you rather own a property in monopoly, or pay rent to the owner for the whole game? It is the exact same in real life. Elapsed time makes it so much more brutal and you will feel it.

Asset owners always end up with more cash, more freedom, and the ability to buy more cash generating assets. The renters have to work harder and longer (and it's always in vain).


I feel you are looking at this idealistically. Maybe you are not renting currently, or paying a mortgage, or working full time? I don't know. I don't know your situation.

fucking suifuel, i'll move out this summer and i will start paying rent, i have a lottery ticket (a business plan i am very confident in) but i need 200k to make sure it works, there is no way in hell im making 200k jfl JUST FUCKING LOL, i want to get surgery as well which is like 20-30k fml

 

[fukmylyf]

so you recognize this but still encourage people to get married and have kids? Doesn't make much sense. Unless I'm confusing you with another user

 

[Prettyboy]

That is how it’s always been, the vast majority of people were always meant to be serfs, social media just made it impossible not to compare yourself to the lucky few who were bornt into assets

 

[Seth Walsh]

so you recognize this bukidt still encourage people to get married and have kids? Doesn't make much sense. Unless I'm confusing you with another user

Good call out, pretty legitimate too.




Yeah, I don't think some rotter should start a family. I preach improvement for the sake of continuity.

It's not smart to live in squalor and raise kids.

That's why being a well adjusted man, who meets and marries a well adjusted woman, and has kids, is SO IMPORTANT.

People can change over time. They can learn, make better decisions, and work towards something.

I said earlier in this thread that private property is the reason for monogamy, and it's a good foundation.

The real blackpill is that wealth inequality is the driver of socioeconomic eugenics.

No house, no wife, no kids. No continuity. No follow-through.

Living alone in a rented apartment from age 30-90+, or get on the property ladder and start a family.

Getting a house is so important. It is something that has always been avoided on the forum for years.

Do people see how bizarre it was that gonial angles and lack of top tier forward growth were used as excuses without confronting things (such as wealth inequality) as reasons for tragic long term life outcomes?


I also believe in the genetic influences behind all of this.

Part of the reason I made this suifuel thread was so that people don't blame anything other than wealth inequality and the hand they were dealt. In fact, you should not blame anything. Just focus on what is in your control, biologically and economically.


Most of the long term economic factors are out of your control, as are the biological factors. But there is always room to make the most strategic moves.

Also, you can enjoy life, if you don't constantly worry about where you'll end up in 60 years. Get as much joy out of life as you can. Your destiny is mostly determined. So don't compare yourself to others, maximise what is in your control, and challenge yourself to grow as much as possible.

If you don't let this thread instil fear, then you are already on the right track.


I am playing 5D chess with everyone, really.

 

[Alias!]

ropefuel

 

[(In)CelibatePsycho2]

must be nice being 16 again thinking you can conquer the world and you'll become some rich multimillionaire. You're in for a rude awakening young man.

Guess again, I’m 18

 

[JohnDoe]

Guess again, I’m 18
View attachment 3534118

"I'm not a baby anymore, i'm a toddler!!!!"