Intellectual Q&A 1: Intellectual Q&A 1: Do you believe existence can be directly and entirely explained through logic?

Intellectual Q&A 1: Do you believe existence can be entirely explained through logic?

  • Yes, I believe that logic, etc. can directly explain existence, including consciousness, and more.

    Votes: 6 46.2%
  • No, I believe that logic, etc. has limits to what it can and can not explain.

    Votes: 7 53.8%

  • Total voters
    13
enchanted_elixir

enchanted_elixir

Access All My Guides ➡️ shorturl.at/SPUPX
Contributor
Joined
Apr 15, 2022
Posts
18,349
Reputation
26,498
Intellectual Q&A 1: Do you believe existence can be directly and entirely explained through logic?
Discuss your thoughts and why.

Godels incompleteness theorem is why I believe no
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: Carbine, Debetro, nathan and 2 others
could you ask some questions for non intellectuals?
 
  • JFL
Reactions: african_subhuman, silently_said, Roquefort and 7 others
the 1st one
 
  • +1
Reactions: enchanted_elixir
I forgot to add view votes but I chose no.
 
Do more questions like: ass or tits?
 
  • Love it
  • +1
Reactions: ey88 and oily703
No way
 
  • +1
Reactions: moreplatesmoreweigh
anyone who answered yes please explain
 
  • +1
Reactions: Carbine and enchanted_elixir
It's like who came first the chicken or the egg
obviously this is an analogy for God's existence
We cannot prove, through logic, which came first; the creation or the creator (who was once a creation :p)
 
I believe that there is logical pathways to prove all that is true/real. We really don’t get many philosophers every generation, and when we do they always find something to contribute. Although we might not have these pathways in public knowledge now, hopefully more will be discovered in the future.
 
  • +1
Reactions: nathan
If you voted yes put me on ignore
 
  • Woah
Reactions: nathan
I believe that logic has the capacity to explain existence dot by dot and point by point, but i also believe that we will never have all the variables necessary gathered as human beings in our limited time and space reach and our even more limited physical and cognitive capacities, so we will never be able to explain it without a superior force that takes us through the road.
 
  • +1
Reactions: nathan and silently_said
It’s the only thing I miss about the gym
Yeah but natty is so cucked jfl. Took me 2 years to get my bench up to 60 but ig it’s because I started at 12
 
  • +1
Reactions: ey88
I believe that logic has the capacity to explain existence dot by dot and point by point, but i also believe that we will never have all the variables necessary gathered as human beings in our limited time and space reach and our even more limited physical and cognitive capacities, so we will never be able to explain it without a superior force that takes us through the road.
Dnr
 
It's like who came first the chicken or the egg
obviously this is an analogy for God's existence
We cannot prove, through logic, which came first; the creation or the creator (who was once a creation :p)
obviously the creator came first, all is contingent in the logic of our universe. All that is contingent eventually reaches a stopping point, by logic, the final point has to be non-contingent therefore it exists outside of the logic of pure universe. that is the creator. creator created logic.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Mess
obviously the creator came first, all is contingent in the logic of our universe. All that is contingent eventually reaches a stopping point, by logic, the final point has to be non-contingent therefore it exists outside of the logic of pure universe. that is the creator. creator created logic.
So that means the creator exists outside logic, meaning he cannot be proven through it
 
Intellectual Q&A 1: Do you believe existence can be directly and entirely explained through logic?
Discuss your thoughts and why.

Godels incompleteness theorem is why I believe no
depends on what u mean by logic

logic as a system itself does not serve to explain anything, its a system of evaluating valid inferences so the question is incoherent
 

Similar threads

D
Replies
104
Views
1K
metacognitivist
metacognitivist
S
Replies
7
Views
720
Trilogy
Trilogy
_MVP_
Replies
2
Views
50
flippasav
flippasav
ihearvoices
Replies
6
Views
249
ihearvoices
ihearvoices
enchanted_elixir
Replies
44
Views
1K
Deleted member 89948
D

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top