Intellectual Q&A 1: Intellectual Q&A 1: Do you believe existence can be directly and entirely explained through logic?

[enchanted_elixir]

Intellectual Q&A 1: Do you believe existence can be directly and entirely explained through logic?
Discuss your thoughts and why.

Godels incompleteness theorem is why I believe no

 

[Nirvana]

could you ask some questions for non intellectuals?

 

[nathan]

the 1st one

 

[Deleted member 97572]

Why aren't votes public

 

[enchanted_elixir]

I forgot to add view votes but I chose no.

 

[enchanted_elixir]

Why aren't votes public

Because I forgot...

 

[moreplatesmoreweigh]

Do more questions like: ass or tits?

 

[ey88]

No way

 

[oily703]

anyone who answered yes please explain

 

[enchanted_elixir]

No way

?

 

[moreplatesmoreweigh]

Because I forgot...

Fucking retard failure. U forgot to make votes public hahahahahaha jfl how can someone be so stupid

 

[Deleted member 99995]

It's like who came first the chicken or the egg
obviously this is an analogy for God's existence
We cannot prove, through logic, which came first; the creation or the creator (who was once a creation )

 

[ey88]

?

What

 

[DavidLard]

I believe that there is logical pathways to prove all that is true/real. We really don’t get many philosophers every generation, and when we do they always find something to contribute. Although we might not have these pathways in public knowledge now, hopefully more will be discovered in the future.

 

[moreplatesmoreweigh]

No way

Bros Avi just double scooped and hit bench

 

[AustrianMogger]

Intellectual Q&A 1: Do you believe existence can be directly and entirely explained through logic?
Discuss your thoughts and why.

Godels incompleteness theorem is why I believe no

No

 

[nathan]

No

No way

why not?

 

[ey88]

Bros Avi just double scooped and hit bench

I miss benching

 

[moreplatesmoreweigh]

I miss benching

Moving some heavy ass weight feels so epic

 

[ey88]

why not?

It just seems impossible to me, there is so many possibilities

 

[Deleted member 97572]

If you voted yes put me on ignore

 

[ey88]

Moving some heavy ass weight feels so epic

It’s the only thing I miss about the gym

 

[MaghrebGator]

I believe that logic has the capacity to explain existence dot by dot and point by point, but i also believe that we will never have all the variables necessary gathered as human beings in our limited time and space reach and our even more limited physical and cognitive capacities, so we will never be able to explain it without a superior force that takes us through the road.

 

[moreplatesmoreweigh]

It’s the only thing I miss about the gym

Yeah but natty is so cucked jfl. Took me 2 years to get my bench up to 60 but ig it’s because I started at 12

 

[moreplatesmoreweigh]

I believe that logic has the capacity to explain existence dot by dot and point by point, but i also believe that we will never have all the variables necessary gathered as human beings in our limited time and space reach and our even more limited physical and cognitive capacities, so we will never be able to explain it without a superior force that takes us through the road.

Dnr

 

[DavidLard]

It's like who came first the chicken or the egg
obviously this is an analogy for God's existence
We cannot prove, through logic, which came first; the creation or the creator (who was once a creation )

obviously the creator came first, all is contingent in the logic of our universe. All that is contingent eventually reaches a stopping point, by logic, the final point has to be non-contingent therefore it exists outside of the logic of pure universe. that is the creator. creator created logic.

 

[Deleted member 99995]

obviously the creator came first, all is contingent in the logic of our universe. All that is contingent eventually reaches a stopping point, by logic, the final point has to be non-contingent therefore it exists outside of the logic of pure universe. that is the creator. creator created logic.

So that means the creator exists outside logic, meaning he cannot be proven through it

 

[metacognitivist]

Intellectual Q&A 1: Do you believe existence can be directly and entirely explained through logic?
Discuss your thoughts and why.

Godels incompleteness theorem is why I believe no

depends on what u mean by logic

logic as a system itself does not serve to explain anything, its a system of evaluating valid inferences so the question is incoherent