Interplay of eyebrows and "hunter eyes"

Dastan

Dastan

It's never over.
Joined
Apr 2, 2022
Posts
882
Reputation
872
Recently i noticed one thing: the more appealing eyes parameters of a given person are - the less he descends if you reduce his eyebrows thickeness / visibilty.

Then, i morphed the pics i consider more or less perfect eye areas (structure, features) to reduce eyebrows visibility and then did the same with not that good eye areas to visually check if this theory is true. After reviewing the pics - it seems to be true.

This may sound like common sense, like "If eye area is bad and you further reduce the eyebrows visibility on top of that, ofc it would look much worse, compared to erasing some of the eyebrows on otherwise relatively perfect eye areas". But this is not what im telling you. In this case its likely that the absolute positive or negative impact of thick and visible eyebrows or thin and invisible is diminshed (when the rest of the eye area is closer to perfection), which is maybe kinda expected in worse = less visible eyebrows, but not expected in case of better = more visible eyebrows, the whole point is that the otherwise perfect eye areas do not significantly ascend if you add more eyebrows visibility for some reason (or descend much if you reduce it).

I uploaded the full article with the visual examples of "before and after" reducing eyebrows visibilty on my looksmaxing blog section here: https://www.ascendbase.pro/reflections_eyebrows-impact.html
 
  • +1
Reactions: shitskinism
Okay, uploading the visual reference images here.

- If we take someone as Drago, who has a great compact, angular, wide PFL, no UEE eye area and reduce his eyebrows visibility = he kinda doesn't descend:

1740696734950
VS
1740696744694


- Same for De Poot:

1740696759548
VS
1740696781761


- Same for O'Pry:

1740696817480
VS
1740696839102


- If we take an image of Barrett, where he has black colored eyebrows and compare it to where he has less visible eyebrows, his overall facial coloring / contrast balance looks better in the 2nd:

1740696869720
VS
1740696892296


- But if we take someone who doesn't have the structure and features of the previously mentioned perfect eye area, and reduce his eyebrows visibility, he descends A LOT.

- For example, Ian Somerhalder:

1740696955915
VS
1740696970829



- Henry Cavill:

1740697186161
VS
1740697205432


- Justin Bieber:

1740697242889
VS
1740697254373
 

Attachments

  • 1740697020987.png
    1740697020987.png
    127.4 KB · Views: 0
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: vernier and shitskinism
good research
 
what happened to this forum man :feelswhy:
 
Bro you've been here for 3 years already, I believe it's the most water thing ever
 
Bro you've been here for 3 years already, I believe it's the most water thing ever
This may sound like common sense, like "If eye area is bad and you further reduce the eyebrows visibility on top of that, ofc it would look much worse, compared to erasing some of the eyebrows on otherwise relatively perfect eye areas". But this is not what im telling you. In this case its likely that the absolute positive or negative impact of thick and visible eyebrows or thin and invisible is diminshed (when the rest of the eye area is closer to perfection), which is maybe kinda expected in worse = less visible eyebrows, but not expected in case of better = more visible eyebrows, the whole point is that the otherwise perfect eye areas do not significantly ascend if you add more eyebrows visibility for some reason (or descend much if you reduce it).
 
This may sound like common sense, like "If eye area is bad and you further reduce the eyebrows visibility on top of that, ofc it would look much worse, compared to erasing some of the eyebrows on otherwise relatively perfect eye areas". But this is not what im telling you. In this case its likely that the absolute positive or negative impact of thick and visible eyebrows or thin and invisible is diminshed (when the rest of the eye area is closer to perfection), which is maybe kinda expected in worse = less visible eyebrows, but not expected in case of better = more visible eyebrows, the whole point is that the otherwise perfect eye areas do not significantly ascend if you add more eyebrows visibility for some reason (or descend much if you reduce it).
tbh no offence but like… bruh like na nvm :feelswhy::feelswhy::feelswhy:
 
stop mumbling, say it clearly
you a goofy ahh blud? like goofy ahh bloodicus on da treadmill with stilts under the jeans?
 
Okay, uploading the visual reference images here.

- If we take someone as Drago, who has a great compact, angular, wide PFL, no UEE eye area and reduce his eyebrows visibility = he kinda doesn't descend:

View attachment 3527006 VS View attachment 3527007

- Same for De Poot:

View attachment 3527009 VS View attachment 3527010

- Same for O'Pry:

View attachment 3527011 VS View attachment 3527013

- If we take an image of Barrett, where he has black colored eyebrows and compare it to where he has less visible eyebrows, his overall facial coloring / contrast balance looks better in the 2nd:

View attachment 3527014 VS View attachment 3527016

- But if we take someone who doesn't have the structure and features of the previously mentioned perfect eye area, and reduce his eyebrows visibility, he descends A LOT.

- For example, Ian Somerhalder:

View attachment 3527019 VS View attachment 3527021


- Henry Cavill:

View attachment 3527025 VS View attachment 3527027

- Justin Bieber:

View attachment 3527030 VS View attachment 3527032
Lol de poot is ltn in the morph
 

Similar threads

al7yq
Replies
34
Views
3K
cheekbonesforlife
C
WrathOfOlives
Replies
52
Views
2K
brutalpilled
brutalpilled
Jihadist Euro
Replies
15
Views
4K
Jihadist Euro
Jihadist Euro
D
Replies
0
Views
432
Deleted member 96813
D

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top