D
Deleted member 1901
Kraken
- Joined
- Apr 15, 2022
- Posts
- 12,230
- Reputation
- 14,495
Giga Lifefuel
I measured the ES ratios and the first photo comparison where she’s not smiling was 0.467 and 0.486, respectively. In the second photo comparison, where she’s smiling, her ES ratios were 0.46 and 0.48, respectively. Her midface ratio unexpectedly remained unchanged in both photo comparisons. I’m not sure why the midface ratio stayed the same, because assuming the IPD did indeed increase, then the midface must have lengthened to preserve the ratio. A 0.02 increase is IPD without surgery in two years is BIG for us IPDcels. I just hope it really is possible because it’s possible that I made measurement errors or that the pictures were taken in different conditions allowing lens distortion to warp proportions.
Celebrating two years Migraine Free!!
August 2016 update: This Blog post has been shared tens of thousands of times with views in the hundreds of thousands. I have received thousands of e-mails from all over the world concerning the...
www.michalechatham.com
I measured the ES ratios and the first photo comparison where she’s not smiling was 0.467 and 0.486, respectively. In the second photo comparison, where she’s smiling, her ES ratios were 0.46 and 0.48, respectively. Her midface ratio unexpectedly remained unchanged in both photo comparisons. I’m not sure why the midface ratio stayed the same, because assuming the IPD did indeed increase, then the midface must have lengthened to preserve the ratio. A 0.02 increase is IPD without surgery in two years is BIG for us IPDcels. I just hope it really is possible because it’s possible that I made measurement errors or that the pictures were taken in different conditions allowing lens distortion to warp proportions.
Last edited: