IQ isn't important

Beastimmung

Beastimmung

Misanthropic Flâneur
Joined
Jun 28, 2024
Posts
5,438
Reputation
11,034
If I see another retard pull out that cope
1721565151296
 
  • +1
  • JFL
  • So Sad
Reactions: 5'7 zoomer, Deleted member 80648, got.daim and 3 others
I couldn't understand the graph, iq is cope
 
  • JFL
  • So Sad
Reactions: Deleted member 80648, Deleted member 53670, got.daim and 4 others
It's not important as far as attractiveness is concerned.

Another study for you:

High IQ men are more likely to remain virgins longerEdit

permalink | category: Mental | table of contents
Studies assessing the relation of IQ to mating success in America have found that both adolescent men and women have higher rates of virginity when they have high IQ.

For instance, a study conducted by Halpern et al. (2000) that used a total sample of N = 11,696 adolescents from two longitudinal surveys of adolescent health and sexual behavior, measured the IQs of participants using a simple and equivalent measure of IQ—The Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-Revised (PPVT–R)—which has a correlation of .64 with the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children, indicating that the test is a good measure of "g," i.e general intelligence.

Combining this measure with reports of sexual activity, sexual maturation, and mother's level of education, a statistical analysis of the data revealed that the most sexually successful individuals seem to be those with an IQ of 70-110. This IQ range consists of the borderline mentally impaired at the lower end (70, an IQ below this threshold is generally considered to constitute an intellectual disability) to somewhat above average (110) at the higher end.

The peak was at the 75-90 IQ range for males, with these males the least likely to be virgins as adolescents.

At the low end of the spectrum, an interesting trend emerges, as we see that low IQs affect male and female sexual activity differently. 46.7% of low IQ men were sexually active, while only 18.4% of low IQ women were. Thus low IQ men were 2.5x as likely as low IQ women to be sexually successful.

Discussion:

This study would suggest that high IQ impairs both men and women from sexual success, but low IQ does not as substantially impair men's sexual success as it would for a woman.

Quotes:

  • "63.3% of adolescent men and 81.6% of women with IQ scores below average have never had sex and most have had fewer experiences of romantic attraction."
  • "An adolescent with an IQ score of 100 was 1.5 to 5 times more likely to have had intercourse than an adolescent with an above-average score of about 120 to 130."
  • "Controlling for age, physical maturity, and mother's education, a significant curvilinear relationship between intelligence and coital status was demonstrated;adolescents at the upper and lower ends of the intelligence distribution were less likely to have sex. Higher intelligence was also associated with postponement of the initiation of the full range of partnered sexual activities."
References:

  • Hapern CT, Joyner K, Udry JR, Suchindran C. 2000. Smart teens don't have sex (or kiss much either). J Adolesc Health. 26(3): 213-25. [Abstract]
  • Agencies. 2007. Studies show IQ link to virginity. The Times of India. [News]
 
  • +1
  • JFL
  • So Sad
Reactions: Deleted member 80648, Deleted member 68081, Deleted member 65576 and 1 other person
It's not important as far as attractiveness is concerned.

Another study for you:
Thats cause they can control themself and not needlessly fuck anything that moves like the lower classes
 
  • +1
  • So Sad
Reactions: Deleted member 80648, Deleted member 68081, watah and 1 other person
Thats cause they can control themself and not needlessly fuck anything that moves like the lower classes
I'd rather be of regular intelligence and attractive to women. That's what matters in the end.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
  • So Sad
Reactions: T50 Demon, Deleted member 80648, Deleted member 68081 and 1 other person
Estimate his rough IQ please

 
  • So Sad
Reactions: Deleted member 80648
It isn’t that important for dating, that’s for sure. At least not in 2024
 
  • So Sad
Reactions: Deleted member 80648
Hard to prove that iq correlates with happiness.
 
  • +1
  • So Sad
Reactions: Deleted member 80648 and Darkeningstar
It isn’t that important for dating, that’s for sure. At least not in 2024
It is tough. Girls in university go for other guys in university
 
  • So Sad
Reactions: Deleted member 80648
  • JFL
  • So Sad
Reactions: Deleted member 80648 and Deleted member 44368
Most guys in universities are good looking
Yeah and? IQ correlates with good looks and good social standing of your family anyways
 
  • JFL
  • So Sad
Reactions: Deleted member 80648 and The Grinch
  • Hmm...
  • So Sad
Reactions: Deleted member 80648 and ZachS
personally i could have chosen to pursue any one of those majors and jobs, but i decided to open up a business and made it successful in less than a year, money mogging everyone ik at 17, now everyone is study-slaving and complaining about money :forcedsmile:

it sounds good on paper, having an actual degree and job mogs any business when it comes to Aura-maxxing, especially if you were a young kid spouting nonesense to a bunch of brainwashed sheep about "muh business"
 
  • So Sad
Reactions: Deleted member 80648
I just took a quantitative IQ test to cope with the fact that I binge ate and scored 126, it was a gold standard test

That’s top 5% of the population (mathematical ability-wise)
are you white?
 
  • So Sad
Reactions: Deleted member 80648
standardized tests should rly just measure neurocranium at this point
 
  • So Sad
Reactions: Deleted member 80648
  • So Sad
Reactions: Deleted member 80648
HighIQ is an extreme disadvantage in life.

I know cuz mine is 128
 
  • So Sad
Reactions: Deleted member 80648

Similar threads

valentine
Replies
19
Views
280
RXnd
RXnd
schizowillascend
Replies
40
Views
518
AustrianMogger
AustrianMogger
Muttcel foid killer
Replies
19
Views
128
Muttcel foid killer
Muttcel foid killer
asdvek
Replies
32
Views
248
RODEBLUR
RODEBLUR
iblamexyz
Replies
3
Views
114
gookcelriceR
gookcelriceR

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top