is 0.4 and 0.5 esr equally as bad or is one worse than the other

yoshisand

yoshisand

where is my lower third?
Joined
Jan 21, 2024
Posts
1,535
Reputation
818
my personal opinion is that 0.5 is better on females and 0.4 is better on men wat do you think?
 
bump
 
  • JFL
Reactions: thebuffdon690
bump
 
  • JFL
Reactions: thebuffdon690
bump
 
  • JFL
Reactions: thebuffdon690
bump
 
  • JFL
Reactions: thebuffdon690
bump
 
  • JFL
Reactions: thebuffdon690
Both are same level of bad
 
my personal opinion is that 0.5 is better on females and 0.4 is better on men wat do you think?
0,5 is better than 0,4 on both genders. Very low ipd look so bad.
 
So does very wide set
You sad 0.5 vs 0.4. Very wide is that with "dolphin syndrome" dont remember the name. Close set eyes are more noticeble than wide set eyes. Was demonstrated.
 
You sad 0.5 vs 0.4. Very wide is that with "dolphin syndrome" dont remember the name. Close set eyes are more noticeble than wide set eyes. Was demonstrated.
Pics of those ratios or 🧢
 
Pics of those ratios or 🧢
Abviously a huge diference between wide set and close set eyes. Ignoring the overall features and you see how bad close eyes look, makes midface looking disportioned long and afect harmony more than wide set eyes imo and there are examples of wide set eyes on men also were you sed wide set are a bigger flaw on men.
 

Attachments

  • RDT_20241004_2251183605603437177725736.png
    RDT_20241004_2251183605603437177725736.png
    1.3 MB · Views: 0
  • RDT_20241004_2250133774559648115470878.png
    RDT_20241004_2250133774559648115470878.png
    1.3 MB · Views: 0
  • which-is-more-of-a-flaw-wide-set-eyes-or-close-set-eyes-v0-dd29ncgkm12d1.jpeg
    which-is-more-of-a-flaw-wide-set-eyes-or-close-set-eyes-v0-dd29ncgkm12d1.jpeg
    185.8 KB · Views: 0
Last edited:

Similar threads

Shahnameh
Replies
0
Views
36
Shahnameh
Shahnameh
PeakIncels
Replies
39
Views
163
Latinolooksmaxxer
Latinolooksmaxxer
Futura
Replies
18
Views
910
ahouzeh18
A
shieldzz
Replies
16
Views
323
Dele Alli Regen
Dele Alli Regen

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top