Crayola CØck
You Will Never Be What A Man Should Be
- Joined
- Oct 10, 2023
- Posts
- 828
- Reputation
- 1,361
I grabbed my cock ruler and put it across a wall with marks.
I noticed 24 inches does indeed look quite impressive overall in terms of width.
22+ is decent but not really impressive. And 25+ is getting freaky wide....
So is 24 the magic number?
Two rulers across is the minimum to look objectively "wide" or "big" in terms of shoulders for most guys?
Don't @ me that military study or shit, that is old and no one cares anymore.
And yeah small waist makes shoulders APPEAR bigger but objective width still matters because heftier dudes can still sizepill you hard if you're under 24 inch bideltoid.
Most natty, big framed Chad-type guys are 21+ easily even without gym or roids or bulking, so to mog them you gotta be 22+ minimum and ideally around 24.
I think this settles the shoulderpill/bideltoid/etc. argument.
If you're 22 at 15% bf or less you are decent.
If 24 you are good at 15% bodyfat.
If 25-26+ you are a fucking monster if lean in any way.
I noticed 24 inches does indeed look quite impressive overall in terms of width.
22+ is decent but not really impressive. And 25+ is getting freaky wide....
So is 24 the magic number?
Two rulers across is the minimum to look objectively "wide" or "big" in terms of shoulders for most guys?
Don't @ me that military study or shit, that is old and no one cares anymore.
And yeah small waist makes shoulders APPEAR bigger but objective width still matters because heftier dudes can still sizepill you hard if you're under 24 inch bideltoid.
Most natty, big framed Chad-type guys are 21+ easily even without gym or roids or bulking, so to mog them you gotta be 22+ minimum and ideally around 24.
I think this settles the shoulderpill/bideltoid/etc. argument.
If you're 22 at 15% bf or less you are decent.
If 24 you are good at 15% bodyfat.
If 25-26+ you are a fucking monster if lean in any way.