is 6'6 too tall?

s7seveenn

s7seveenn

NOT A FOID
Joined
Jan 25, 2025
Posts
379
Reputation
348
With 6'2 being ideal for human performance and 6'5 being the most attractive, the theoretical best height to be is 6'3-6'4 to balance out this data.

So is 6'6 too tall for men to look good? Or is it too lanky
 
  • +1
Reactions: auitistsurvior and Orka
With 6'2 being ideal for human performance and 6'5 being the most attractive, the theoretical best height to be is 6'3-6'4 to balance out this data.

So is 6'6 too tall for men to look good? Or is it too lanky
if you are in asian country ,yes

you wont be able to fuck a foid if you are over 6'5 + in asian country your dick cannot literally enter a foids pussy

in western world over 195 cm looking fucking autistic ngl peak attraction is 190-193 cm over that looks autist

in west you can physically fuck foids but they wont let you most likely
 
  • +1
Reactions: s7seveenn
it's barely outside of the ideal range imo so it's that height where you're starting to get too tall
but ofc it's a very good height and it's definitely better than being average or short
 
  • +1
Reactions: s7seveenn and Orka
With 6'2 being ideal for human performance and 6'5 being the most attractive, the theoretical best height to be is 6'3-6'4 to balance out this data.

So is 6'6 too tall for men to look good? Or is it too lanky
It depends a lot on proportions, 6'2-6'4 is still better, but if you've got good torso and leg proportions and a decent physique at 6'6 then you won't look lanky at all, and would still be as a appealing as a 6'4 guy in some instances.

6'2-6'4 will always be better than 6'6, but its not really too tall

Mark my answer as a solution by clicking the checkmark on the right ->
(pls)
 
  • So Sad
Reactions: s7seveenn
Theres an ideal height range probably like 6'3-6'8
6'6 isnt too tall imo
 
  • +1
  • JFL
  • Hmm...
Reactions: PSLbbc, s7seveenn and Tyler1
The taller the better. In nature their were giants in the Wild West of America that were found. They were cannibals with red hair from the mountains. They were all 7'0 tall minimum.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Newday*V3, s7seveenn and Tyler1
Anything over 6'4 is retarded, 6‘4 is ideal
6'6+ mfs will make you feel like you get mogged hard but it is rare asf and nobody cares because you are already tall especially if you are frauding with 2 inch shoes to 6‘6
 
  • +1
Reactions: s7seveenn
The taller the better. In nature their were giants in the Wild West of America that were found. They were cannibals with red hair from the mountains. They were all 7'0 tall minimum.
Ok. Well they clearly went extinct for a reason. I don't believe a height this tall is ideal.
 
Above 195 cm = bullshit
im exactly 195
Black man crying cry
 
  • Woah
Reactions: SA7
Ok. Well they clearly went extinct for a reason. I don't believe a height this tall is ideal.
They went extinct because they were cannibals who lost in War to the Native Americans. Being tall is absolutely ideal which is why women keep picking it.
 
  • +1
Reactions: s7seveenn
They went extinct because they were cannibals who lost in War to the Native Americans. Being tall is absolutely ideal which is why women keep picking it.
What do you get out of hypothesizing about this historical shit that doesn’t affect your life though? If you believe the government is hiding shit, you should at least learn about things which will benefit you. Knowing information about giants won’t.
 
What do you get out of hypothesizing about this historical shit that doesn’t affect your life though? If you believe the government is hiding shit, you should at least learn about things which will benefit you. Knowing information about giants won’t.
I'm 6'5 and know that it has positively benefited my dating life. I have 119 women who've added me on Yubo right now.
 
  • +1
Reactions: s7seveenn
I'm 6'5 and know that it has positively benefited my dating life. I have 119 women who've added me on Yubo right now.
This is completely unrelated to the message I sent you. However, obviously being taller in nature is better. It proves you’re more dominant. However I’d like to argue, if you’re above 7 feet most woman closer to 5ft than 6ft would stay away from you as they may feel threatened.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: thereallegend
This is completely unrelated to the message I sent you. However, obviously being taller in nature is better. It proves you’re more dominant. However I’d like to argue, if you’re above 7 feet most woman closer to 5ft than 6ft would stay away from you as they may feel threatened.
No, if sexual dimorphism is true, then the taller the better.
 
  • +1
Reactions: s7seveenn
No, if sexual dimorphism is true, then the taller the better.
That’s just not how the human body functions. Peak performance of a man scientifically is 6’2. Once humans get too tall they start to have serious health problems and don’t work the same way that regular humans do. Most humans above the height of 7ft are a victim of gigantism (but for those who aren’t), they’re probably living fine. Just not ideal.
 
That’s just not how the human body functions. Peak performance of a man scientifically is 6’2. Once humans get too tall they start to have serious health problems and don’t work the same way that regular humans do. Most humans above the height of 7ft are a victim of gigantism (but for those who aren’t), they’re probably living fine. Just not ideal.
False, many hunter gatherer men were above 6'2 and were just fine. In fact they were selected to pass on their genes.
 
  • +1
Reactions: s7seveenn

Similar threads

user228947529
Replies
19
Views
470
AverageCurryEnjoyer
AverageCurryEnjoyer
F
Replies
48
Views
339
IraniancelV2
IraniancelV2
Ozchyn
Replies
16
Views
286
bohoomax
bohoomax
s7seveenn
Replies
20
Views
181
Meteor21
Meteor21
got.daim
Replies
21
Views
562
BigBallsLarry
BigBallsLarry

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top