Is being lanky as failo as being fat?

[Ältai.Anabolic]

.

 

[Deleted member 70681]

No being lanky is a halo

 

[160cmcurry]

only if you’re somalian

 

[Gonthar]

Which one of these guys has higher SMV?

 

[Ältai.Anabolic]

Which one of these guys has higher SMV?
View attachment 3575306

Right in Poland

 

[Deleted member 126897]

Which one of these guys has higher SMV?
View attachment 3575306

lanky is such a halo

 

[superpsycho]

not even close

 

[optimisticzoomer]

Which one of these guys has higher SMV?
View attachment 3575306

@ShortUglyAndBrown

 

[White_Bwoi]

Seriously?

It's like on *reddit* when they tell skinny fat guy to BULK first not cut because he'll be "too lanky, toothpick", being skinny MOGS all (with a lil bit of muscles is cool).

 

[White_Bwoi]

Also if as a skinny guy you have no smv it's over

 

[theonewhocantascend]

Lanky is literally peak smv for jb, bro.

 

[theonewhocantascend]

Also if as a skinny guy you have no smv it's over

Skinny = high class, elegant, makes you look taller, less body fat means better cheekbones….

But even at your leanest you should weight at least 85kgs though because otherwise you might as well be a bitch, I mean….
One of these days I saw a guy on Reddit who weighted 50kgs at 170cm like

 

[butterworld]

lean atheltic>=roided>lanklet>skinny fat>fat

 

[Deleted member 78797]

what a stupid question

 

[White_Bwoi]

Skinny = high class, elegant, makes you look taller, less body fat means better cheekbones….

But even at your leanest you should weight at least 85kgs though because otherwise you might as well be a bitch, I mean….
One of these days I saw a guy on Reddit who weighted 50kgs at 170cm like

I don't have that many muscles to look good on 85 buddy,
when 77-80 it's okey, chicks end on ~50kg tho so it's enough of a difference