is bimax worth the risk for me?

[ducksoover]

I will.be getting rhino for my typical pakistani nose. I don't actually mind the length but it is slightly crooked which throws my harmony off and it makes me seem more recessed than I am.

As for my jaw, would getting a bimax be worth the risk? the risk of being botched, money, etc.

 

[AustrianMogger]

I will.be getting rhino for my typical pakistani nose. I don't actually mind the length but it is slightly crooked which throws my harmony off and it makes me seem more recessed than I am.

As for my jaw, would getting a bimax be worth the risk? the risk of being botched, money, etc. View attachment 4436021View attachment 4436022

Himax has almost 0 fisk.
Yes its worth it for you and rhino too

 

[vermicel]

I will.be getting rhino for my typical pakistani nose. I don't actually mind the length but it is slightly crooked which throws my harmony off and it makes me seem more recessed than I am.

Morph with a straightened dorsum :

I'm not sure this picture allows me to run ratios & angles with high reliability. All or part of the assessment below could be wrong.

Anyway, based on this picture, you have :
- a long ramus
- a good gonial position (below the mouth)
- an ideal gonial angle (~120°)
- an ideal ramus to mandible ratio
- an ideal mentolabial angle (~111°)
- an ideal nasofacial angle (37°)
- an ideal brow ridge inclination angle (12°)
- a slightly below ideal nasofrontal angle (~121° VS 125-132 ideal range)
- an unideal nasolabial angle (~120° VS 90-98 ideal range)
- an unideal facial convexity - measured from the glabella (~161° VS 165-175 ideal range)
- an unideal submental cervical angle (~150° VS 90-100 ideal range)
- a failed lip assessment (Steiner s-line)

So what does that tell us ?
Either your nose tip is a bit too upturned, or your philtrum is a bit too flat, or both at the same time. Probably due to a flawed projection of the maxilla.
Either you are too fat (excessive submental deposit), or your mandible and chin are not wide enough and/or not forward grown enough to stretch the submental skin properly.
If I had to guess (my understanding of jaw surgeries is very shallow), then, yes, a bimax would help to solve at least part of these issues.

Here's another morph showing the potential effects of a bimax and then a rhino (and maybe some fat loss too, for the submental region) :

 

[ducksoover]

Morph with a straightened dorsum :

View attachment 4436047

I'm not sure this picture allows me to run ratios & angles with high reliability. All or part of the assessment below could be wrong.

Anyway, based on this picture, you have :
- a long ramus
- a good gonial position (below the mouth)
- an ideal gonial angle (~120°)
- an ideal ramus to mandible ratio
- an ideal mentolabial angle (~111°)
- an ideal nasofacial angle (37°)
- an ideal brow ridge inclination angle (12°)
- a slightly below ideal nasofrontal angle (~121° VS 125-132 ideal range)
- an unideal nasolabial angle (~120° VS 90-98 ideal range)
- an unideal facial convexity - measured from the glabella (~161° VS 165-175 ideal range)
- an unideal submental cervical angle (~150° VS 90-100 ideal range)
- a failed lip assessment (Steiner s-line)

So what does that tell us ?
Either your nose tip is a bit too upturned, or your philtrum is a bit too flat, or both at the same time. Probably due to a flawed projection of the maxilla.
Either you are too fat (excessive submental deposit), or your mandible and chin are not wide enough and/or not forward grown enough to stretch the submental skin properly.
If I had to guess (my understanding of jaw surgeries is very shallow), then, yes, a bimax would help to solve at least part of these issues.

Here's another morph showing the potential effects of a bimax and then a rhino (and maybe some fat loss too, for the submental region) :

View attachment 4436182

whoa thank you for the assessment!

I do like the morphs, really puts things into perspective.

and maybe some fat loss too, for the submental region

I'm actually cursed with a low hyoid bone . Even when I do get super lean, the submental angle isn't optimal.

I'm planning some kind of lift in that region as low hyoid bone is pretty much impractical to fix

 

[nishka]

bro you should cut the beard for better pictures / assesment and use a tripod to take pictures
Also if you lose 5% body fat, it will be much better because you'll be able to see your bones

 

[ducksoover]

because you'll be able to see your bones

i can do that much better with a CT scan