Is creatine toxic?

KindMaster1

KindMaster1

Face, Redpill, Devotion
Joined
Dec 17, 2024
Posts
709
Reputation
486
I can acknowledge if I'm wrong as a responsible person.

In theory, it should work, because they take the toughest cuts of red meat with no fat, and dissolve it, into a substance of amino acids, from the original tough protein that was dense and therefore nutrient rich.
That substance will contain all dissolved proteins, all types of amino acids, including creatine, and this is why they sell it as creatine, including because it's the main amino acid.

Now, I found disprovings of safety and effectiveness of creatine. Let's consider those.

Apparently there is no good solvent to get a dryable substance from meat, so they use petroleum solvent, hexane.
Then producers prove how toxic their solvent is by filtering it out at the end of dissolving.

Apparently majority of creatine comes from plants, not from meat. We know we become underdeveloped aged subhumans when eating plants compared to meat, this proves they do not get creatine, but have no qualms of lying about getting a creatine.

Apparently they bleach creatine powder, hiding toxic colour. But, toxicity shows through with very unpleasant toxic taste. People here reported that it was extremely disgusting to consume. It could be a petroleum solvent that they taste.

DHT increase from creatine could be a release (and therefore depletion) of DHT in response to toxicity of creatine, to detox it the fuck out of blood stream (as it damages as any other toxin the cells).
I first thought it was the case, but then maintenance period of the PubMed study reassured me it's all good, because even at maintenance they maintained 40 percent increase of DHT from baseline, compared to 50 from loading it. But then again, maintenance still has 5 grams of creatine, and it's basically a bad study that did not factor in a period of 0 grams of creatine to allow us to compare (so, if DHT was released meaning depleted to detox, then the 0 grams of creatine period should show lower than baseline level of DHT, or at least markers of cellular damage and ageing).

What are your thoughts on creatine supplement?
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: IAMNOTANINCEL and flambria
113860
 
  • JFL
Reactions: canoli, flambria and hybobu
Bro said creatine is in plants
 
  • JFL
Reactions: rossover, IAMNOTANINCEL and flambria
Every synthetic/plant supplement is toxic
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deathninja328, zaebalsya, EliasDePoop and 3 others
save yourself the embarrassment and delete your account while you can
 
  • JFL
Reactions: flambria
yes it will make you melt to liquid then die
 
  • JFL
Reactions: flambria, pashtunnigga1 and KindMaster1
because they take the toughest cuts of red meat with no fat, and dissolve it, into a substance of amino acids, from the original tough protein that was dense and therefore nutrient rich.
That's not how they produce creatine.

%99 of creatine is petroleum.
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: KindMaster1
save yourself the embarrassment and delete your account while you can
If you're not gonna contribute, get the fuck out of here, autistic.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: flambria
That's not how they produce creatine.

%99 of creatine is petroleum.
Really?
Then it would be irradiated vegetable oil vitamin D3 scenario.
I would be very surprised if you're correct.
How would it even become a powder.
How would so many people buy it. Even a rando coworker mentioned to me creatine water.
 
Producers don't care.
Apparently you blindly trust your producers, hence making this retardation of incapability of reading.
im kidding nigga
creatine isn't toxic there are tons of studies that say it isn't
You won't get a lot of creatine if you're not taking supplement, there isn't much in any food.
 
  • +1
Reactions: KindMaster1
Bro watched the new goatis video and immediately made this:lul::lul::lul:
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Deathninja328, hybobu and MaracasMogs
I can acknowledge if I'm wrong as a responsible person.

In theory, it should work, because they take the toughest cuts of red meat with no fat, and dissolve it, into a substance of amino acids, from the original tough protein that was dense and therefore nutrient rich.
That substance will contain all dissolved proteins, all types of amino acids, including creatine, and this is why they sell it as creatine, including because it's the main amino acid.

Now, I found disprovings of safety and effectiveness of creatine. Let's consider those.

Apparently there is no good solvent to get a dryable substance from meat, so they use petroleum solvent, hexane.
Then producers prove how toxic their solvent is by filtering it out at the end of dissolving.

Apparently majority of creatine comes from plants, not from meat. We know we become underdeveloped aged subhumans when eating plants compared to meat, this proves they do not get creatine, but have no qualms of lying about getting a creatine.

Apparently they bleach creatine powder, hiding toxic colour. But, toxicity shows through with very unpleasant toxic taste. People here reported that it was extremely disgusting to consume. It could be a petroleum solvent that they taste.

DHT increase from creatine could be a release (and therefore depletion) of DHT in response to toxicity of creatine, to detox it the fuck out of blood stream (as it damages as any other toxin the cells).
I first thought it was the case, but then maintenance period of the PubMed study reassured me it's all good, because even at maintenance they maintained 40 percent increase of DHT from baseline, compared to 50 from loading it. But then again, maintenance still has 5 grams of creatine, and it's basically a bad study that did not factor in a period of 0 grams of creatine to allow us to compare (so, if DHT was released meaning depleted to detox, then the 0 grams of creatine period should show lower than baseline level of DHT, or at least markers of cellular damage and ageing).

What are your thoughts on creatine supplement?
no bro, use creatine
 
  • +1
Reactions: MaracasMogs and KindMaster1
im kidding nigga
creatine isn't toxic there are tons of studies that say it isn't
You won't get a lot of creatine if you're not taking supplement, there isn't much in any food.
That's be excellent. Please share best proofs why it's not toxic.
 
I can acknowledge if I'm wrong as a responsible person.

In theory, it should work, because they take the toughest cuts of red meat with no fat, and dissolve it, into a substance of amino acids, from the original tough protein that was dense and therefore nutrient rich.
That substance will contain all dissolved proteins, all types of amino acids, including creatine, and this is why they sell it as creatine, including because it's the main amino acid.

Now, I found disprovings of safety and effectiveness of creatine. Let's consider those.

Apparently there is no good solvent to get a dryable substance from meat, so they use petroleum solvent, hexane.
Then producers prove how toxic their solvent is by filtering it out at the end of dissolving.

Apparently majority of creatine comes from plants, not from meat. We know we become underdeveloped aged subhumans when eating plants compared to meat, this proves they do not get creatine, but have no qualms of lying about getting a creatine.

Apparently they bleach creatine powder, hiding toxic colour. But, toxicity shows through with very unpleasant toxic taste. People here reported that it was extremely disgusting to consume. It could be a petroleum solvent that they taste.

DHT increase from creatine could be a release (and therefore depletion) of DHT in response to toxicity of creatine, to detox it the fuck out of blood stream (as it damages as any other toxin the cells).
I first thought it was the case, but then maintenance period of the PubMed study reassured me it's all good, because even at maintenance they maintained 40 percent increase of DHT from baseline, compared to 50 from loading it. But then again, maintenance still has 5 grams of creatine, and it's basically a bad study that did not factor in a period of 0 grams of creatine to allow us to compare (so, if DHT was released meaning depleted to detox, then the 0 grams of creatine period should show lower than baseline level of DHT, or at least markers of cellular damage and ageing).

What are your thoughts on creatine supplement?
bla bla bla
 
bla bla bla
So you get pristine creatine from best producers in the world? What processes do they use to extract creatine and make their product?
 
707 posts.

470 reputation

nigga needs to focus on better posts and not creatine
 
That's be excellent. Please share best proofs why it's not toxic.
studies :

Paul Saladino's right about creatine
Goatis thinks it's useless because he doesn't work out or engage his body in any physical activity
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deathninja328 and KindMaster1
So you feel 0 toxification, and positive effects? What effects?
best It gives strength to your muscles brother, don't be stupid, look for quality creatine, creatine is what gives consistency to your muscles.
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: KindMaster1
studies :

Paul Saladino's right about creatine
Goatis thinks it's useless because he doesn't work out or engage his body in any physical activity
Digging in right now. Thank you bro! Did you search it by keyword in PubMed?
 
Digging in right now. Thank you bro! Did you search it by keyword in PubMed?
No i asked ChatGPT for studies about the benefits of creatine and picked the best imo.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Deathninja328 and KindMaster1
707 posts.

470 reputation

nigga needs to focus on better posts and not creatine
The styles that get reactions on this site are either perfect, which is difficult to achieve, or shitty speak that I won't do.
 

Similar threads

wastedspermcel
Replies
90
Views
5K
mog_me
mog_me
D
Replies
22
Views
4K
Whatashame
Whatashame
Data
Replies
25
Views
4K
talented_gambler
T

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top