Is existentialism disproven?

[Poisonpunk3]

Existentialism says: Man inherently has no purpose, for which that he has to create it himself.

But let's take a different approach. Let us say, man here, he is Subhuman. And as most of us here understand the concept that "opportunities", which life "throws" at us are calculated through a base, that base being your position/standing in [a] society. So, if man is Subhuman, that would also mean he is sitting low in our [societal] hierarchy. Using the same logic I've talked about before, that would mean life wouldn't sell him "chances". That also means he can't create purpose. And you cannot build nothing out of nothing.

So do you think this way of thinking is fallible?

 

[RXnd]

Existentialism says: Man inherently has no purpose, for which that he has to create it himself.

But let's take a different approach. Let us say, man here, he is Subhuman. And as most of us here understand the concept that "opportunities", which life "throws" at us are calculated through a base, that base being your position/standing in [a] society. So, if man is Subhuman, that would also mean he is sitting low in our [societal] hierarchy. Using the same logic I've talked about before, that would mean life wouldn't sell him "chances". That also means he can't create purpose. And you cannot build nothing out of nothing.

So do you think this way of thinking is fallible?

Purpose isn’t dependent on societal opportunities

Internal resolve and relationships

 

[Poisonpunk3]

Bump.

 

[looksmaxxed]

Existentialism says: Man inherently has no purpose, for which that he has to create it himself.

But let's take a different approach. Let us say, man here, he is Subhuman. And as most of us here understand the concept that "opportunities", which life "throws" at us are calculated through a base, that base being your position/standing in [a] society. So, if man is Subhuman, that would also mean he is sitting low in our [societal] hierarchy. Using the same logic I've talked about before, that would mean life wouldn't sell him "chances". That also means he can't create purpose. And you cannot build nothing out of nothing.

So do you think this way of thinking is fallible?

sounds about right, at a certain cut off we just need to accept that the universe screwed up and put the mistake out of its misery. it's what a humane society would do.