Is having a low bf more important than being big?

O'Pry

O'Pry

It's Sean O from Kennesaw Georgia
Joined
Mar 9, 2024
Posts
131
Reputation
224
Not talking about Jordan Barret's skinny twink body, but say a lean athletic body which is low bf like Chico vs a rugby body like the photo which has more muscle mass but also a bit of fat which affects the face.

Rugby
 
  • +1
Reactions: Klasik616
Id say this changes with age. older women like rugby body better but athletic build is probably preferred by younger foids
 
Not talking about Jordan Barret's skinny twink body, but say a lean athletic body which is low bf like Chico vs a rugby body like the photo which has more muscle mass but also a bit of fat which affects the face.

View attachment 3289836
The picture you have shown is not lean nor athletic and not ideal
 
Not talking about Jordan Barret's skinny twink body, but say a lean athletic body which is low bf like Chico vs a rugby body like the photo which has more muscle mass but also a bit of fat which affects the face.

View attachment 3289836
This guy is literally fat
You could make argument for 15% bf but not this 20+
 
  • +1
Reactions: Carbine
Being lean and tall is better.
If you're not tall grow some muscle to not look weak but not too much or you'll be ogre.
Foids (young foids) love tall and slim men.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Carbine

Similar threads

justanothercurrycel
Replies
11
Views
532
PrinceofDarkness
PrinceofDarkness
20/04/2008
Replies
73
Views
1K
DORIAN
DORIAN
King Solomon
Replies
27
Views
729
King Solomon
King Solomon

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top