Is height more important than face?

CorinthianLOX

CorinthianLOX

𝕯𝖝𝕯 𝖈𝖗𝖊𝖜 · beautyiseverything
Joined
Mar 26, 2025
Posts
5,141
Reputation
10,040
Seriously. I’ve started to think about this.
 
  • +1
Reactions: SilverStCloud
Yea honestly I think it’s height first but gl can make up for it
Like if you ask a girl a 6ft3 ltn
Or 5’7 htn most will choose 6ft3 ltn
But each woman is different so you never know
 
  • +1
Reactions: CorinthianLOX and MFMF
It's not plus the fact that is easier to maintain face than it is to maintain height as you age. Dolph Lundgren was 198cm/6.6 in his youth and shrank to 188-191cm/6.2-.6.3 in old age. If you are not broke and have good bones underneath you can maintain facial good looks for a long time. Check out Tom cruise and Brad Pitt, specifically Brad Pitt since he got a facelift in this last year and ascended him hard.
Unless you are under 170cm if you have a good face, at least chadlite, then you are cruising.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Saint Casanova, CorinthianLOX and finnished
In my experiences, If you're tall and below mtn then no, height doesn't matter more than the face at all, above it's 50/50.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: CorinthianLOX
My 5’8 zesty Italian pretty boy friend got a mtb so yeah
 
  • +1
Reactions: CorinthianLOX
how many threads ab this shit bro. Face>height, but there will be some foids who prefer 6’4 MTN over 5’9 HTN
 
  • +1
Reactions: CorinthianLOX
how many threads ab this shit bro. Face>height, but there will be some foids who prefer 6’4 MTN over 5’9 HTN
How many foids prefer the 6’4 mtn over 5’9 htn?
 
after 5.10 face matters more

if you are below you need to be high MTN atleast imo
 
  • +1
Reactions: VohnnyBoy and CorinthianLOX
It's not plus the fact that is easier to maintain face than it is to maintain height as you age. Dolph Lundgren was 198cm/6.6 in his youth and shrank to 188-191cm/6.2-.6.3 in old age. If you are not broke and have good bones underneath you can maintain facial good looks for a long time. Check out Tom cruise and Brad Pitt, specifically Brad Pitt since he got a facelift in this last year and ascended him hard.
Unless you are under 170cm if you have a good face, at least chadlite, then you are cruising.
He wasn’t 198cms, he was 194cms and he only shrank about 4cms to 190cm into his age. Don’t know where you got that.
 
  • +1
Reactions: SilverStCloud
i made that up btw
 
  • +1
Reactions: CorinthianLOX
He wasn’t 198cms, he was 194cms and he only shrank about 4cms to 190cm into his age. Don’t know where you got that.
Fair enough, is quite difficult to accurately guess someone's height especially ppl u never met. I went with the 198cm claim because it was made by Sylvester Stallone who met Dolph in his prime when he was playing Drago in Rocky 4. He also looked like one of the celebs that is genuinely in the 6.4.5-6.5 range along with Jacob Elordi and Joe manganiello.
 
  • +1
Reactions: CorinthianLOX and Saint Casanova
absolutely not
 
  • +1
Reactions: CorinthianLOX
Only if shorter than 6ft (or 180 if you dont live in a cucked imperial system country)
 
A wise man once said:
5.9 CL > 6.4 MTN
6.4 HTN > 5.9 chad
 
  • +1
Reactions: CorinthianLOX
Is 6.4 HTN more common than 5.9 chad?
Yes, surely it is more common, but the difference in looks from MTN to CL is a lot more than the difference from HTN to Chad, that's why 6'4 HTN will perform better in the market. Regarding height, it only makes a difference when there is at least a 1 standard deviation difference, and 6 inches is 2.5 standard deviations
 
  • +1
Reactions: CorinthianLOX

Similar threads

enlightful
Replies
60
Views
453
enlightful
enlightful
asian_ascender
Replies
16
Views
214
Klasik616
Klasik616
T4deoIncel0s
Replies
57
Views
382
iblamemydadsgenes
I
ReadBooksEveryday
Replies
26
Views
240
Evergreen
Evergreen

Users who are viewing this thread

  • Back
    Top