Is it a red flag if a girl has a snap score of 160k?

[Dr. Mog]

I cant imagine the number of contacts you need for this shit.

 

[LiteralCaucasian]

TBH a woman using social media in the first place is a red flag for me

 

[Ken]

Yes, dont ignore it like I did. Anything over 10k is a red flag

 

[Niklaus Mikaelson]

I cant imagine the number of contacts you need for this shit.

Yeah it's a red flag in my books, depends on how long she had Snapchat and so forth and if she still uses it, mostly a red flag If her BF list (top 6 profiles she texted the most) are mainly guys or girls. If she were in a long term relationship she could have a high snapscore duo to that, but if it's multiple guys then it's a red flag

 

[Niklaus Mikaelson]

Yes, dont ignore it like I did. Anything over 10k is a red flag

I'd say 50k-100k is acceptable, anything over that i consider a red flag(atleast in Denmark) as some girls use it to text girls, group chats and so forth, some of them had snap since 2013 which will result in almost nobody having less than 10k. It also highly depends on location wether Snapchat is a primary texting media though

 

[ascension]

I don't have snapchat but how many snaps do you have to send to get to that score?

 

[Chadpreetmaybe]

Even if you assume 0.1% of those snaps were nudes she sent to different guys, it still comes out to be 16,000. That's giga whore level, big red flag

 

[LightSkinNoob]

Most foids 16-21 have 500,000+ snapscore, haven’t met a women in years with sub 100k

 

[Dr. Mog]

Even if you assume 0.1% of those snaps were nudes she sent to different guys, it still comes out to be 16,000. That's giga whore level, big red flag

I get your point but you def failed in maths and I can’t believe you are Indian now

 

[Chadpreetmaybe]

I get your point but you def failed in maths and I can’t believe you are Indian now

I fell off lol, i meant 10%, which is a fair number for western women, i am still not used to with the interface of this site