Is it better to be strikingly attractive or high appeal attractive

ShawarmaFilth

ShawarmaFilth

“The average is 5.1 bro!! I swear!!”
Joined
Mar 23, 2024
Posts
11,918
Reputation
12,325
High appeal you will turn every head because women would like you.
Strikingly attractive you will turn every head and you will mog everyone, whilst looking aesthetic. You will still have good appeal.

If they both entered the room together, the one with who was strikingly attractive would outperform (ironic as he doesn’t have high appeal in general), due to looking rarer and more aesthetically pleasing when making a comparison.

Against 99.9% of other people, the one with high appeal would mog.
PSL holds more truth than most people would like to admit.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 68023, Deleted member 31971, Deleted member 33711 and 1 other person
depends what you want to do. Being highly conventionally attractive is great for job searching and finding a partner while extreme striking looks basically assures you'll get high payed modeling contracts.

Conventionally attractive yields higher status. CEO vs top model
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: greycel
depends what you want to do. Being highly conventionally attractive is great for job searching and finding a partner while extreme striking looks basically assures you'll get high payed modeling contracts.

Conventionally attractive yields higher status. CEO vs top model
I mean for life in general

What would be better

I’d personally say high appeal but idk
 
  • +1
Reactions: Imretarded?
I mean for life in general

What would be better

I’d personally say high appeal but idk
I don't think there is really much of a difference. Your opportunities will change a bit but really either could do whatever the other can do socially.

Personally, I'd rather be extremely striking, almost elf like. That would make me happiest tbh
 
  • +1
Reactions: greycel
depends what you want to do. Being highly conventionally attractive is great for job searching and finding a partner while extreme striking looks basically assures you'll get high payed modeling contracts.

Conventionally attractive yields higher status. CEO vs top model
False Dilemma. You are just assuming one course of action for the dude who is strikingly attractive.

Also, just because most CEOs you have seen are conventionally attractive compared to strikingly attractive, doesn’t mean that conventionally attractive people have a higher chance of being a CEO. Being strikingly attractive is much, much, much rarer.

A strikingly attractive person will have much more dimorphic features garnering more respect from men.
A conventionally attractive person will get more attention from women, but by a small amount.

And like I said, if they were to enter the same room together, automatically the rarity of the features compared to a generic good looking guy (who appeals to many); would instantly draw all attention on the strikingly attractive person.
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Imretarded?
I’ll be both.
 
  • Love it
Reactions: greycel
False Dilemma. You are just assuming one course of action for the dude who is strikingly attractive.

Also, just because most CEOs you have seen are conventionally attractive compared to strikingly attractive, doesn’t mean that conventionally attractive people have a higher chance of being a CEO. Being strikingly attractive is much, much, much rarer.

A strikingly attractive person will have much more dimorphic features garnering more respect from men.
A conventionally attractive person will get more attention from women, but by a small amount.

And like I said, if they were to enter the same room together, automatically the rarity of the features compared to a generic good looking guy (who appeals to many); would instantly draw all attention on the strikingly attractive person.
Im pretty sure someone like Brad Pitt would get more male respect than Alais Depoot despite the fact Depoot is significantly more striking and has more perfect features.

Men are scared of someone like Opry and get uncomfortable, I don't see how that would yield better results in the business world.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 68023
Im pretty sure someone like Brad Pitt would get more male respect than Alais Depoot despite the fact Depoot is significantly more striking and has more perfect features.

Men are scared of someone like Opry and get uncomfortable, I don't see how that would yield better results in the business world.
@Imretarded? you are hmm reacting a lot. Not surprised given your join date and name, but I’ll give you the benefit of the doubt.
The example you gave is shit, given the fact that Brad Pitt is also striking. He has striking colouring, a striking eye area and a striking jaw.
A better example for somebody with truest high appeal, but not striking (hard to find, also mogs Pitt in general appeal):
IMG 0837
IMG 0836
IMG 0835


And for somebody strikingly attractive, I’ll go for a very striking dude (equally in retrospect to Nick Bateman being the highest appeal). Picking Depoot is not really fair, as this dude is much more striking colouring/eyes/angularity. He would have less general appeal than Nick Bateman, despite being higher PSL:
IMG 0839
IMG 0840
IMG 0838


They both enter a room, the one with the sharper low trust features wins.
And we are only talking about women here, the second guy will be much more captivating in person and have higher respect from other men.
 
Last edited:
  • Hmm...
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 68023 and Imretarded?

Similar threads

uksucks
Replies
4
Views
75
Panzram
Panzram
Surfsup
Replies
2
Views
123
Surfsup
Surfsup
swt
Replies
1
Views
86
swt
swt
Big_dee_tyrone
Replies
17
Views
210
Chadmog
Chadmog
choppedshyt
Replies
5
Views
67
choppedshyt
choppedshyt

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top