Is it morally right thing to do to bring such a kid into world

[Jason Voorhees]

I think it's very selfish of the parents to bring such a baby into this world. The suffering and pain he will have to endure after childhood. Who will look after him? What is he going to do? If they wanted a kid so bad. They could have adopted one but ofcourse it wouldn't feel as empowering and virtue signalling as giving birth to children with genetic defects and cursing them to a life full of pain, misery and social isolation. Complete and utter retardation.

 

[Jason Voorhees]

@666PSL @TechnoBoss @Sprinkles

 

[TiktokUser]

That’s exactly what the Jews want you to do. Less population = more control

 

[Jason Voorhees]

That’s exactly what the Jews want you to do. Less population = more control

Yes because a man with half his hands and legs will be the next mein fuhrer to exterminate them all and bring peace, tranquility and restore the balance of power to this world.

 

[Jason Voorhees]

@moggerofhumanity @wishIwasSalludon

 

[Deleted member 30845]

No. It's cruel and unempathetic. Parents should have a right to medically end the lives of sick children.
Obligating parents to care for disabled and incapable kids is what's inhuman.

If it's a baby or a child it's not a big deal. Just spawn another one. The elderly are another topic.

 

[Sprinkles]

I’m a staunch antinatalist for this very reason. If you’re a broke fuck you’re also dooming them to a life of wageslavery.

It’s even worse if you have shit genes. It’s mainly the sons getting doomed to oblivion.

 

[saiya_online]

I think it's very selfish of the parents to bring such a baby into this world. The suffering and pain he will have to endure after childhood. Who will look after him? What is he going to do? If they wanted a kid so bad. They could have adopted one but ofcourse it wouldn't feel as empowering and virtue signalling as giving birth to children with genetic defects and cursing them to a life full of pain, misery and social isolation. Complete and utter retardation.

It's because of how retarded most parents are ngl, and environment is really important at the start. These types of parents are the kind to still baby a kid at 10 years old when they should've already be expected to know all of algebra, read high level literature, etc.

 

[Deleted member 51358]

That’s an interesting question

personally I think if you choose to bring a kid into the world knowing they’ll have some debilitating

Defect it’s immoral

 

[TiktokUser]

Yes because a man with half his hands and legs will be the next mein fuhrer to exterminate them all and bring peace, tranquility and restore the balance of power to this world.

Tbh I didn’t even finish reading what you said lmao

I didn’t know that baby was disabled

 

[Deleted member 136049]

I mean I look like this so I don't have to worry about my child suffering on this planet with subhuman genes

 

[Jason Voorhees]

Bump

 

[FiendFiend]

I think it's very selfish of the parents to bring such a baby into this world. The suffering and pain he will have to endure after childhood. Who will look after him? What is he going to do? If they wanted a kid so bad. They could have adopted one but ofcourse it wouldn't feel as empowering and virtue signalling as giving birth to children with genetic defects and cursing them to a life full of pain, misery and social isolation. Complete and utter retardation.

dude how did they know their kid was gonna be deformed? Like the fuck? What do u want them to do now? Kill it? Like fuck its brutal, but its better to give him a shot at life even if theres a 1% chance he will do okay and live a happy life, than just kill it. I can imagine him when hes 18 though complaining to his parents and shit saying he nver wished he was born though, thats the most brutal part.

 

[Deleted member 133180]

I think it's very selfish of the parents to bring such a baby into this world. The suffering and pain he will have to endure after childhood. Who will look after him? What is he going to do? If they wanted a kid so bad. They could have adopted one but ofcourse it wouldn't feel as empowering and virtue signalling as giving birth to children with genetic defects and cursing them to a life full of pain, misery and social isolation. Complete and utter retardation.

yeah 100% it selfish I'm not gonna bring a child into this world and gift him my big head genes and watch him experience the same pain I went to middle school - high school but worse

 

[Deleted member 90705]

I think it's very selfish of the parents to bring such a baby into this world. The suffering and pain he will have to endure after childhood. Who will look after him? What is he going to do? If they wanted a kid so bad. They could have adopted one but ofcourse it wouldn't feel as empowering and virtue signalling as giving birth to children with genetic defects and cursing them to a life full of pain, misery and social isolation. Complete and utter retardation.

i agree, children are way to expensive in 2025 anyway

 

[goontang]

pleasuring yourself is the most selfless thing you can do

 

[Gaygymmaxx]

I think it's very selfish of the parents to bring such a baby into this world. The suffering and pain he will have to endure after childhood. Who will look after him? What is he going to do? If they wanted a kid so bad. They could have adopted one but ofcourse it wouldn't feel as empowering and virtue signalling as giving birth to children with genetic defects and cursing them to a life full of pain, misery and social isolation. Complete and utter retardation.

That's awful dude

If my son asked for s4nctioned suicid3 looking like that

What am I to say?

No?

.... no that's not what I'd say