Is it normal to get variations in ratings?

[JestterMayer]

I tend to use the same 1-3 pictures for ratings, I somehow got a large amount of variance between ratings anything from lmtn straight up to lhtn, I consider myself dead average or maybe slightly higher.

Is it normal for people to have different and outright opposing opinions about someones rating? I've seen people call clavicular anything from hmtn to mCL so maybe its not that rare...

 

[tomahawk]

Lighting + jesters + nobody actually rates by PSL, js how they feel it (for greys: they rate by appeal) so its normal
Mark as solution using the checkmark on the right

 

[JestterMayer]

Lighting + jesters + nobody actually rates by PSL, js how they feel it (for greys: they rate by appeal) so its normal
Mark as solution using the checkmark on the right

I don't fuck with lighting at all and I might take a picture in fucking bus florescent lighting or natural lighting doesnt make a big difference unless im using a fucking candle as a light source.

Ill mark as a solution in a bit bhai I just need to see some other answers

 

[tomahawk]

I don't fuck with lighting at all and I might take a picture in fucking bus florescent lighting or natural lighting doesnt make a big difference unless im using a fucking candle as a light source.

Ill mark as a solution in a bit bhai I just need to see some other answers

Preferential variance

 

[JestterMayer]

Preferential variance

Yeah I think thats true, deathnic niggas tend to prefer an ethnics face more for example

 

[JestterMayer]

Preferential variance

Also from what I get from what you're saying you think org ratings are completely retarded and baseless

 

[esoterik]

why wouldnt it be? if ratings were not varied then the concept of subjective perception wouldnt exist, making beauty objective

 

[tomahawk]

Also from what I get from what you're saying you think org ratings are completely retarded and baseless

Most yes

 

[JestterMayer]

why wouldnt it be? if ratings were not varied then the concept of subjective perception wouldnt exist, making beauty objective

But beauty one way or another is somewhat objective, I'm not saying everyones going to measure your face instinctively but I can defo spot horseface in someone like K shami for example
The problem is the deck is stacked against us most foids don't go past mtb without fakeup while we have to dictate a completely new direction of life to live by to feel better long term

 

[chickencalves]

I tend to use the same 1-3 pictures for ratings, I somehow got a large amount of variance between ratings anything from lmtn straight up to lhtn, I consider myself dead average or maybe slightly higher.

Is it normal for people to have different and outright opposing opinions about someones rating? I've seen people call clavicular anything from hmtn to mCL so maybe its not that rare...

Bunch of virgins putting you on a scale is not exactly science, especially considering they're full of cope and biases.
I keep saying, real life experience with girls is your real rating.

 

[esoterik]

But beauty one way or another is somewhat objective, I'm not saying everyones going to measure your face instinctively but I can defo spot horseface in someone like K shami for example
The problem is the deck is stacked against us most foids don't go past mtb without fakeup while we have to dictate a completely new direction of life to live by to feel better long term

spotting abnormal ratios doesnt make beauty any more objective, the biggest factor of beauty and aesthetics is phenotypes, you would like a mid white women before you like a indian with 10/10 bones (unless you yourself are indian and like that sort of stuff, which also proves subjectivity)


ratios obviously play a big deal, but phenotypes are in my opinion the origins of beauty/aesthetics

 

[JestterMayer]

spotting abnormal ratios doesnt make beauty any more objective, the biggest factor of beauty and aesthetics is phenotypes, you would like a mid white women before you like a indian with 10/10 bones (unless you yourself are indian and like that sort of stuff, which also proves subjectivity)

Yeah thats true, phenotypes and familiarity matter for sure, but I mean for most women, they tend to prefer only and only caucasian or caucasoidal man as in middle eastern or european and everything is goymeat

 

[brumbalascension]

Some people rate you lower to raise their ego, i would say dont be bothered by it

 

[JestterMayer]

Bunch of virgins putting you on a scale is not exactly science, especially considering they're full of cope and biases.
I keep saying, real life experience with girls is your real rating.

My interactions with women are mostly smooth and positive without really having the constables called on my ass. I try to keep things professional if needed. Only time things go wrong is with unwarranted jestermaxxing or ND faggotry.

 

[JestterMayer]

I really appreciate the hopemaxxed comments, this shit keeps me up and has ended up making go through countless sleepless nights.

Im sometimes legitemately in bed mentally visualizing the words MTN and the comments. It terrifies me to my core because I feel like it dictates my happiness.

 

[htnmogsbrutal]

I really appreciate the hopemaxxed comments, this shit keeps me up and has ended up making go through countless sleepless nights.

Im sometimes legitemately in bed mentally visualizing the words MTN and the comments. It terrifies me to my core because I feel like it dictates my happiness.

u shouldnt be putting yourself down over some lifeless niggas that spam shit ratings just focus on yourself and real life experiences as they speak a lot more

 

[thugmaxx]

yes a lot of people are bias depending on what they prefer but there should be an objective range generally for your rating
you’ll never be rated htn and ltn,
only ltn-mtn, mtn-htn, etc