is it over if you use fillers?

[max_frisch]

 

[Deleted member 18361]

Yes fillers r shit

 

[max_frisch]

Yes fillers r shit

fat grafts seem risky too

so basically its game over?

 

[Deleted member 18361]

fat grafts seem risky too

so basically its game over?

Do implants

 

[Artemis]

Fillers are the best if:

1) You need volume without sharp edges
2) You have A LOT OF CASH

YOU ARE NOT 70 LIKE DEMI MOORE. They all look like puffer-fishes because they are afraid to do facelifts (only retards from autists.org jump into surgery without thinking). And they try to stretch the sagging skin with fillers.

You do not need as much filler. If you accept that you do not want sharp shapes in your face, then fillers is ALL YOU NEED. Literally, alternative to implants. BETTER ALTERNATIVE. Except the price, which is brutal TBH.

To clarify about "sharpness"...

Sharp cheekbones:

^ NOT achievable with fillers.

Not-so-sharp cheekbones:

^ achievable with fillers.

 

[Pakicel]

Do implants

most implants look like shit

 

[Pakicel]

Fillers are the best if:

1) You need volume without sharp edges
2) You have A LOT OF CASH

YOU ARE NOT 70 LIKE DEMI MOORE. They all look like puffer-fishes because they are afraid to do facelifts (only retards from autists.org jump into surgery without thinking). And they try to stretch the sagging skin with fillers.

You do not need as much filler. If you accept that you do not want sharp shapes in your face, then fillers is ALL YOU NEED. Literally, alternative to implants. BETTER ALTERNATIVE. Except the price, which is brutal TBH.

To clarify about "sharpness"...

Sharp cheekbones:

^ NOT achievable with fillers.

Not-so-sharp cheekbones:

^ achievable with fillers.

top results require the right soft tissues and fat distribution. And even then you will be able to see the outline of the implant if you are very lean after a workout.

Implants on the cheekones are a terrible idea imo. I have not seen any good results.

 

[Artemis]

top results require the right soft tissues and fat distribution. And even then you will be able to see the outline of the implant if you are very lean after a workout.

Implants on the cheekones are a terrible idea imo. I have not seen any good results.

Yeah, i agree partly with you, we discussed this already.

I think the cases where the shape of the implant is seen and/or unnatural is a design issue: too large implant.

But unfortunately, fillers are too expensive. Depending on the base, even if one has a good base, it is thousands and thousands euros per year in Europe. Trying a slightly smaller cheek implant can help preserve money, and would give superior result in some cases.

For women, there is no possible reason to go for implant, except money. Women need only volume, not shape.

 

[Deleted member 18361]

most implants look like shit

Most arent designed properly

 

[Pakicel]

Most arent designed properly

getting the design right is the hard part. it is impossible to predict.

 

[max_frisch]

Fillers are the best if:

1) You need volume without sharp edges
2) You have A LOT OF CASH

YOU ARE NOT 70 LIKE DEMI MOORE. They all look like puffer-fishes because they are afraid to do facelifts (only retards from autists.org jump into surgery without thinking). And they try to stretch the sagging skin with fillers.

You do not need as much filler. If you accept that you do not want sharp shapes in your face, then fillers is ALL YOU NEED. Literally, alternative to implants. BETTER ALTERNATIVE. Except the price, which is brutal TBH.

To clarify about "sharpness"...

Sharp cheekbones:

^ NOT achievable with fillers.

Not-so-sharp cheekbones:

^ achievable with fillers.

facelifts seem super legit

 

[max_frisch]

fuck man




i think ill just get a facelift with 50

fillers dont convince and fatgrafts are too risky for my taste, i dont wanz fucin fat limps below my eyes or get blind

 

[Foreverbrad]

I need a facelift and I’m 29 jfl

 

[Deleted member 8988]

No. Inject only on the bone and only for chin, jaw and upper eyelid. There will be no migration.

 

[Deleted member 18840]

No. Inject only on the bone and only for chin, jaw and upper eyelid. There will be no migration.

You changed your views bro? Elab

 

[Dystopian]

Yes fillers r shit

Cope

 

[Deleted member 8988]

You changed your views bro? Elab

From what I know there isnt enough evidence against or pro filler migration theory so its better to be safe and inject only in places where its certain it wont be the case

 

[Deleted member 23554]

is undereye fillers worth the risk for thin undereyecels?

 

[Foreverbrad]

Probably not a good idea long term.

I’m gonna get fillers ONCE to see if these facial changes are enough for chadlite+ … I think the bogged look comes from a lifetime of filler use.

If I become Chadlite+ I’ll get the remaining filler dissolved at the end of orthodontics (which I will get anyway but I don’t think it’s big enough to make or break my face) and go for implants, maybe bimax.

If I don’t become Chadlite+ then I’ll just resign myself to being MTN and will have saved a fortune in surgery that wouldn’t have helped anyway.

 

[zeek]

Yes