Is it strange that I draw when I take my notes?

Jason Voorhees

Jason Voorhees

๐•ฏ๐–๐•ฏ ๐–ˆ๐–—๐–Š๐–œ ๐•ต๐–Š๐–˜๐–™๐–Š๐–—
Joined
May 15, 2020
Posts
63,870
Reputation
179,689


I started studying finance everyday for around 2-3 hours and yesterday. I was spending some free time at the office watching a lecture on capital markets and taking notes. My coworker walked by saw my notebook, and said it looked like the scribbles of a crazy person . Horrible handwriting and random sketches everywhere.

I had just finished condensing an hour long lecture into about 7-8 pages of bullet points and diagrams. Since heโ€™s from a finance background he was curious and asked โ€œDid you write down how each market functions in terms of capital formation and liquidity. I flipped through and pointed out a drawing to him and explained and he was like so you managed to condense an entire hour long lecture into a few pages. Maybe even I should start drawing.

20250730 134715
1000216240
 
Last edited:
  • +1
  • Woah
Reactions: Chadeep, widdi, sigma boii and 11 others
@imontheloose @Saint Casanova @menas @Chadeep @EliasDePoop
 
  • +1
Reactions: Chadeep, imontheloose, menas and 2 others
@Popstar867
 
  • +1
Reactions: Chadeep, menas, Popstar867 and 1 other person
@imontheloose @Saint Casanova @menas @Chadeep @EliasDePoop


I started studying finance everyday for around 2-3 hours and yesterday. I was spending some free time at the office watching a lecture on capital markets and taking notes. My coworker walked by saw my notebook, and said it looked like the scribbles of a crazy person . Horrible handwriting and random sketches everywhere.

I had just finished condensing an hour long lecture into about five pages of bullet points and diagrams. Since heโ€™s from a finance background he was curious and asked โ€œDid you write down how each market functions in terms of capital formation and liquidity. I flipped through and pointed out a drawing to him and explained and he was like so you managed to condense an entire hour long lecture into a few pages. Maybe even I should start drawing.

View attachment 3971140View attachment 3971137
looks way more organized than my notes
 
  • +1
Reactions: Jason Voorhees
btw why would you buy electric car, arent you scared of the emfs?
 
  • +1
Reactions: sigma boii, ReadBooksEveryday and Jason Voorhees
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: WrothEnd, menas, ReadBooksEveryday and 1 other person


I started studying finance everyday for around 2-3 hours and yesterday. I was spending some free time at the office watching a lecture on capital markets and taking notes. My coworker walked by saw my notebook, and said it looked like the scribbles of a crazy person . Horrible handwriting and random sketches everywhere.

I had just finished condensing an hour long lecture into about 7-8 of bullet points and diagrams. Since heโ€™s from a finance background he was curious and asked โ€œDid you write down how each market functions in terms of capital formation and liquidity. I flipped through and pointed out a drawing to him and explained and he was like so you managed to condense an entire hour long lecture into a few pages. Maybe even I should start drawing.

View attachment 3971140View attachment 3971137
'mirin effort
 
  • +1
Reactions: Rxna and Jason Voorhees


I started studying finance everyday for around 2-3 hours and yesterday. I was spending some free time at the office watching a lecture on capital markets and taking notes. My coworker walked by saw my notebook, and said it looked like the scribbles of a crazy person . Horrible handwriting and random sketches everywhere.

I had just finished condensing an hour long lecture into about 7-8 of bullet points and diagrams. Since heโ€™s from a finance background he was curious and asked โ€œDid you write down how each market functions in terms of capital formation and liquidity. I flipped through and pointed out a drawing to him and explained and he was like so you managed to condense an entire hour long lecture into a few pages. Maybe even I should start drawing.

View attachment 3971140View attachment 3971137
Ngl I know the basic of these terms but I have no idea whats going on , but on your question about how to learn finance is probably watching finance lectures from universities, Iโ€™d say the most important module to understand finance is stochastic calculus
 
  • +1
Reactions: Jason Voorhees and Rxna
Ngl I know the basic of these terms but I have no idea whats going on , but on your question about how to learn finance is probably watching finance lectures from universities, Iโ€™d say the most important module to understand finance is stochastic calculus
Im doing just that. Watching finance lectures from top unis and then jotting down my notes. I plan to give cfa level 1 soon
 
  • +1
Reactions: Popstar867 and Rxna


guys watch this :eek::eek::eek::eek::eek::eek:
 
  • +1
Reactions: Jason Voorhees
  • JFL
Reactions: Rxna
Im doing just that. Watching finance lectures from top unis and then jotting down my notes. I plan to give cfa level 1 soon
Yeah but cfa in all honesty is useless if you want to work in a prestigious company unlike letโ€™s say ACCA in accounting . But it still helps you cover the surface of finance in my opinion . Never forgot though connections/networking are always the key
 
  • +1
Reactions: Jason Voorhees and Rxna
radiation, now you might think im retarded, but just watch the documentary "Generation zapped"
Youโ€™re absolutely retarded. Radiation? How can you seriously be this mentally handicapped? Your source for this information is some random slop too. It is imperative you end your life ASAP.
 
  • +1
Reactions: WrothEnd, Jason Voorhees and Rxna
Youโ€™re absolutely retarded. Radiation? How can you seriously be this mentally handicapped? Your source for this information is some random slop too. It is imperative you end your life ASAP.
1753865304727
 
  • +1
Reactions: Jason Voorhees
Yeah but cfa in all honesty is useless if you want to work in a prestigious company unlike letโ€™s say ACCA in accounting . But it still helps you cover the surface of finance in my opinion . Never forgot though connections/networking are always the key
I wanted to go into more intermediary roles in fintech. I am mainly an tech bro and I have 0 knowledge about finance. I thought doinf a CFA would get my foot in thr door
 
  • +1
Reactions: Rxna
Extremely strange
 
  • +1
Reactions: Jason Voorhees and Rxna
Youโ€™re absolutely retarded. Radiation? How can you seriously be this mentally handicapped? Your source for this information is some random slop too. It is imperative you end your life ASAP.
Tbh it is first time Im hearing this.
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: imontheloose and Rxna
Did you not study electricity doing tech?
Yes. We did is he talking about electromotive force is that what emf stands for? We just represented it wirh epsilon
 
  • +1
Reactions: imontheloose
  • +1
Reactions: imontheloose
Yes. We did is he talking about electromotive force is that what emf stands for? We just represented it wirh epsilon
Electromagnetic fields. Itโ€™s a non-ionising, extremely low f radiation.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Jason Voorhees and Rxna
Also thoughts on OP?
Did you not study electricity doing tech?

have you read this inkie?
 
  • +1
Reactions: Jason Voorhees
its js normal notes jfl
 
  • +1
Reactions: Rxna and Jason Voorhees
Electromagnetic fields. Itโ€™s a non-ionising, extremely low f radiation.
I see idk man I dont remember much of what I studied in my first year. We did have a course related to this I remember
 
  • +1
Reactions: Rxna and imontheloose
  • So Sad
Reactions: Rxna
  • +1
Reactions: inversions

have you read this inkie?
Oh dear, embarrassing yourself more. You seriously use these stupid sources you cannot understand plucked from a telegram conspiracy chat?

Firstly, itโ€™s a completely different frequency and energy. The mouse study is 1350-1375MHz at 3cm exposure for 72hrs compared to an EVโ€™s static ELF fields being like 300Hz tops. 5Hz occurs too. So nice, a factor of 10^7 lower per photon.

Next time, understand the difference between microwave exposure on mice and ELF fields in vehicles.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Jason Voorhees and Rxna
Why did you call him retarded for that?
Heโ€™s insinuating they are damaging โ€” a common down syndrome trait. He doesnโ€™t understand radiation to be important in life and can be harmless, it was famously used in smoke alarms for a while; he thinks radiation means cancer and death as he retardedly proved with his laughable source.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Jason Voorhees and Rxna
Heโ€™s insinuating they are damaging โ€” a common down syndrome trait. He doesnโ€™t understand radiation to be important in life and can be harmless, it was famously used in smoke alarms for a while; he thinks radiation means cancer and death as he retardedly proved with his laughable source.
of course there arent gonna be any sources, bro read your signature, and of course you can debate the same shit for vegetables and meat, and my logic was if the phones can cause cancers and tumors in people who got overly exposed for like 10 years, cant electric cars do the same.


i saw some shit from this website, you might be right, i need to do some further research
 
  • +1
Reactions: Jason Voorhees
of course there arent gonna be any sources, bro read your signature, and of course you can debate the same shit for vegetables and meat, and my logic was if the phones can cause cancers and tumors in people who got overly exposed for like 10 years, cant electric cars do the same.


i saw some shit from this website, you might be right, i need to do some further research
Again, youโ€™re simply showing your incredulity. You canโ€™t explain the phenomenon so you assume a conspiracy of such.

Phones can reach the GHz range. Each photon will have about 10^(-24)J of energy. EVs work on DC and ELF fields in like tens of Hz, sometimes hundreds. Itโ€™s about 10^7 or 10^8 of a factor difference. Ionising vs. non-ionising is something you do not understand. ELF fields simply lack the energy to break the chemical bonds or heat tissue the way higher f RF can, even if they were entirely non-ionising.

Not to mention decades of human epidemiology finds no cancer risk in cellphone usage. Any reference to โ€œpossible carcinogenโ€ which some complete, incredulous retards use as evidence simply means โ€œlimited evidence, keep studyingโ€. Brain-tumour incidents have either remained flat or declined depending on which timeframe you select from.

โ€œIf phones did it, EMF mightโ€ is a fundamentally flawed statement anyway even if I granted you the premise.

Iโ€™m not reading Microwave News as a source compared to peer-reviewed studies. My degree is literally about electricity. Weigh your sources against WHO, IARC, ICNIRP, and the likes.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Jason Voorhees and Rxna
Again, youโ€™re simply showing your incredulity. You canโ€™t explain the phenomenon so you assume a conspiracy of such.

Phones can reach the GHz range. Each photon will have about 10^(-24)J of energy. EVs work on DC and ELF fields in like tens of Hz, sometimes hundreds. Itโ€™s about 10^7 or 10^8 of a factor difference. Ionising vs. non-ionising is something you do not understand. ELF fields simply lack the energy to break the chemical bonds or heat tissue the way higher f RF can, even if they were entirely non-ionising.

Not to mention decades of human epidemiology finds no cancer risk in cellphone usage. Any reference to โ€œpossible carcinogenโ€ which some complete, incredulous retards use as evidence simply means โ€œlimited evidence, keep studyingโ€. Brain-tumour incidents have either remained flat or declined depending on which timeframe you select from.

โ€œIf phones did it, EMF mightโ€ is a fundamentally flawed statement anyway even if I granted you the premise.

Iโ€™m not reading Microwave News as a source compared to peer-reviewed studies. My degree is literally about electricity. Weigh your sources against WHO, IARC, ICNIRP, and the likes.
thank you for educating but im still skeptical
 
  • +1
Reactions: Jason Voorhees
Again, youโ€™re simply showing your incredulity. You canโ€™t explain the phenomenon so you assume a conspiracy of such.

Phones can reach the GHz range. Each photon will have about 10^(-24)J of energy. EVs work on DC and ELF fields in like tens of Hz, sometimes hundreds. Itโ€™s about 10^7 or 10^8 of a factor difference. Ionising vs. non-ionising is something you do not understand. ELF fields simply lack the energy to break the chemical bonds or heat tissue the way higher f RF can, even if they were entirely non-ionising.

Not to mention decades of human epidemiology finds no cancer risk in cellphone usage. Any reference to โ€œpossible carcinogenโ€ which some complete, incredulous retards use as evidence simply means โ€œlimited evidence, keep studyingโ€. Brain-tumour incidents have either remained flat or declined depending on which timeframe you select from.

โ€œIf phones did it, EMF mightโ€ is a fundamentally flawed statement anyway even if I granted you the premise.

Iโ€™m not reading Microwave News as a source compared to peer-reviewed studies. My degree is literally about electricity. Weigh your sources against WHO, IARC, ICNIRP, and the likes.
but isnt it true, that most of these studies were funded my telecommunication companies?
 
  • +1
Reactions: Jason Voorhees
of course there arent gonna be any sources, bro read your signature, and of course you can debate the same shit for vegetables and meat, and my logic was if the phones can cause cancers and tumors in people who got overly exposed for like 10 years, cant electric cars do the same.


i saw some shit from this website, you might be right, i need to do some further research
Again, youโ€™re simply showing your incredulity. You canโ€™t explain the phenomenon so you assume a conspiracy of such.

Phones can reach the GHz range. Each photon will have about 10^(-24)J of energy. EVs work on DC and ELF fields in like tens of Hz, sometimes hundreds. Itโ€™s about 10^7 or 10^8 of a factor difference. Ionising vs. non-ionising is something you do not understand. ELF fields simply lack the energy to break the chemical bonds or heat tissue the way higher f RF can, even if they were entirely non-ionising.

Not to mention decades of human epidemiology finds no cancer risk in cellphone usage. Any reference to โ€œpossible carcinogenโ€ which some complete, incredulous retards use as evidence simply means โ€œlimited evidence, keep studyingโ€. Brain-tumour incidents have either remained flat or declined depending on which timeframe you select from.

โ€œIf phones did it, EMF mightโ€ is a fundamentally flawed statement anyway even if I granted you the premise.

Iโ€™m not reading Microwave News as a source compared to peer-reviewed studies. My degree is literally about electricity. Weigh your sources against WHO, IARC, ICNIRP, and the likes.
I wish I could understand what this means.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Rxna
but isnt it true, that most of these studies were funded my telecommunication companies?
They did a survey on this. Only 20% of phone-health papers were funded by telecom companies. The other 80% were funded usually by universities and charities. If you decide to discard all the literature due to that 20% being funded by telecom, then you now have to reason the actual physics. What is the excuse for the physics? And that only applies if I granted you this ludicrous premise that the literature is all a biased conspiracy.

Not to mention, all the EV work and the rest of EMF literature has zero funding from telecom. Itโ€™s only natural that if youโ€™re in an industry, you fund studies on your products. Not all of them are biased because of that; there are much stricter regulations nowadays, plus with 80% not having this bias and reflecting the same conclusion, itโ€™s safe to accept the consensusโ€ฆ
 
  • +1
Reactions: Chadeep, Jason Voorhees and Rxna
They did a survey on this. Only 20% of phone-health papers were funded by telecom companies. The other 80% were funded usually by universities and charities. If you decide to discard all the literature due to that 20% being funded by telecom, then you now have to reason the actual physics. What is the excuse for the physics? And that only applies if I granted you this ludicrous premise that the literature is all a biased conspiracy.

Not to mention, all the EV work and the rest of EMF literature has zero funding from telecom. Itโ€™s only natural that if youโ€™re in an industry, you fund studies on your products. Not all of them are biased because of that; there are much stricter regulations nowadays, plus with 80% not having this bias and reflecting the same conclusion, itโ€™s safe to accept the consensusโ€ฆ
yeah but there is also a dirty energy problem with electrical cars, and also doesnt heat like kill sperm cells, and i'm pretty sure that phones can heat up testicles while they are in pockets.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Jason Voorhees
yeah but there is also a dirty energy problem with electrical cars, and also doesnt heat like kill sperm cells, and i'm pretty sure that phones can heat up testicles while they are in pockets.
What? Why are you now so bothered about โ€œdirty energyโ€?

They emit less GHGs over their full life cycle than any petrol vehicle would in a much shorter period. EVs merely start their life with carbon debt from battery production, it runs cleaner and cleaner each year.

Yes, sperm loves cold climates. But thereโ€™s been no link between pocket phones and reduced semen quality. They even did heavy 4G-RF exposure on rats and it didnโ€™t raise scrotum temperature at all. I can guarantee you, you are doing much more heating to your balls by general day-to-day means than a phone could ever do. This is a silly line of thinking, Iโ€™m sorry.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Chadeep and Jason Voorhees
What? Why are you now so bothered about โ€œdirty energyโ€?

They emit less GHGs over their full life cycle than any petrol vehicle would in a much shorter period. EVs merely start their life with carbon debt from battery production, it runs cleaner and cleaner each year.

Yes, sperm loves cold climates. But thereโ€™s been no link between pocket phones and reduced semen quality. They even did heavy 4G-RF exposure on rats and it didnโ€™t raise scrotum temperature at all. I can guarantee you, you are doing much more heating to your balls by general day-to-day means than a phone could ever do. This is a silly line of thinking, Iโ€™m sorry.
Yes show that fucker you are Oxford graduate. Go get em tiger.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: imontheloose

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top