Doesn’t the @Fiqh support some of the actions of ISIS?
Some maybe...but as a whole it's quite complicated. There's no group that is infallible, even beyond that...they all have deviated in the past.
Well, they're doing a good job at the moment I guess.
over for his foreheadBahahahahahahaimagine showing your support for isis on an incel made up of racist kaffirs
@Eternal_
Intereeted to hear what. This group is khawarij. I hate every Sunni leader. But equally hate all these groups who claim to be against them taghuts as well.
Khurooj against who though? I have not seen a valuable point made against them to consider them to fall into that heretical sect upon researching.
Bahahahahahaha
Mortal enemies.
There's a whole documentary on the Sahawat that clears up a lot of misunderstandings.
Yeah I already know I'm subhuman tbf
Is there anything in the @Fiqh that could justify looksmaxxing? Or does the whole premise of this site go against it?
Not really, the life of a Muslim shouldn't be spent obsessing over looks since there are many other matters that precede it.
Is this why you’ve resorted to terrorism outreach and recruitment services? Jinns have taken you hostage, beta. Ya allah!!!
They don't equate sin with disbelief like khawarij but they still apply it to Muslims outside their control.
I agree something needed to be done about the Shia militias in Iraq but ISIS thrives from this condition.
Assad literally withdrew from these areas. ISIS have been tactically supported by Assad, the US and Turkey at different times.
Fella you’re supposed to be a based aryan !
Their own spokesperson refutes that notion, can't really blame them given the Sahwa-PTSD if it occurs in some cases.
Taliban are not 'Sunnis', they are Deobandi-deviants who affirm Islam for those who butcher Ahlus-Sunnah, amongst many other issues. I won't declare their kufr as of now but another brother is compiling a list for it. As for IS killing them, it's okay.
Hence why IS can never die, even with a coalition present.
Yes he did withdraw from some areas but this doesn't discount the fact that IS had liberated many nonetheless. For example, in Iraq they liberated Mosul with only 600 fighters lol.
It's literally in their literature. When they declared the Caliphate they said those who don't make hijrah are kafir. Maybe they wouldn't apply it to everyone, because it's logistically impossible for many people. But they sure applied it to everyone.
Well here's where we disagree. Even though I don't like deobandis, Salafis or other sects I wouldn't takfir them. Ironic your custom title says "Sunni Unity". ISIS don't even recognise any Caliphate prior to 661.
I mean if I was the Taliban and ISIS-K was threatening my existence and territory I would too.
Supporting them for this reason is retarded. But practicality takes importance every country in the Middle East one way or another benefits from Isis from a purely realpolitik point of view.
Mosuls Iraq though. He purposely let them grow in Syria to take international gaze from Syria and it worked. Because the pressure on Syria has releived progressively since.
Bashar Al Asshole is no different from all these other secular taghut rulers. I'm a gradualist. I think revolutions are bad. And the classic Sunni authorities would probably agree too since the default position is '1 day of anarchy is worse than 60 years of tyranny'.
I dont believe theres currently a Christian country with anti homosexuality laws, muslims stone people for it, so...
That's one of my gripes, though it's no longer applicable today.
I want Sunni unity but it cannot be possible with those who forsake their religion, I don't takfir based on the sect (except Twelvers) given I take Ibn Taymiyyah's stance on it.
Don't know, I'd rather have a more moderate group like IAI to take over Iraq. However the only hope for Syria is IS.
I'm not denying that he let them grow for his own sake, but it worked in their favour until the fitnah occurred (which wasn't manufactured by Bashar), and then Soleimani called Daddy Russia who couldn't do much of an effect until the American-led coalition bombarded IS to bits.
Frankly, it's bound to happen again given what's occurring in Deir-ez-Zor. IS at the moment are attempting to fight what seems to be a bleak war of attrition. Many experts state that they're in a better position now then they were in Post-Iraqi Sahawat - I agree with this for Syria but not for Iraq, given that they're practically finished there.
True, Russia and Ukraine are Muslim countries.
Killing homosexual people is wrong. There should not be a Christian country to implement such barbaric laws.
I agree they should only be imprisoned the other thing u said isnt real
Oh JFL I fucked up. I jsut saw “ISIS” kills Taliban my bad lol
IS wants to govern territory under strict interpretation of Shari'ah - essentially they want a Caliphate.
We can all be armchair analysts and discredit everything at a whim.
Wait, ISIS is fighting the Taliban now?
Okie dokie
IS-Khorasan comprise of former ANA and Taliban members, they've been fighting since the members defected.
Far too many people here have been straying from the @Fiqh . They will regret it on the day of judgement.
doesnt the Taliban do this
huh I thought they're the same niggas
clear em mazlims out
Not really, they've changed quite drastically from their roots with Mullah Umar. Unfortunately this is the case when you don't have someone like Osama Bin Laden to guide them.
