Gladiator
Banned
- Joined
- Sep 30, 2022
- Posts
- 2,085
- Reputation
- 3,041
Not talking about the credibility of the ratings and if they actually rate you correctly on your appearance, I am talking about the fact that are the votes even real?
So think about it, why would women have the time to post their photos on Photofeeler and get rated. Since for free rating you need karma first you need to vote. Do women have the time to go and vote on photos of mostly subhumans when instead they can be getting their ego pumped on Instagram and dating apps? Women get 1000s of matches already so what will they do by posting on photofeeler? Therefore photofeeler like dating apps should have a majority of men and a smaller percentage of women. I feel this ratio should be worse than that on dating apps.
Now the second point. Are there enough of these women to rate all men?
I feel photofeeler may just be adding fake votes on the basis of several things like the few votes that are real, AI, or some other shit. What do you guys think?
So think about it, why would women have the time to post their photos on Photofeeler and get rated. Since for free rating you need karma first you need to vote. Do women have the time to go and vote on photos of mostly subhumans when instead they can be getting their ego pumped on Instagram and dating apps? Women get 1000s of matches already so what will they do by posting on photofeeler? Therefore photofeeler like dating apps should have a majority of men and a smaller percentage of women. I feel this ratio should be worse than that on dating apps.
Now the second point. Are there enough of these women to rate all men?
I feel photofeeler may just be adding fake votes on the basis of several things like the few votes that are real, AI, or some other shit. What do you guys think?
