Is smoking healthier than meat eating? How many cigarettes a day is the breakpoint ?

Crusile

Crusile

Chicowski
Joined
Dec 5, 2021
Posts
2,709
Reputation
2,575
We know meat is toxic. but how toxic vs cigarettes?
 
smoking is worse
 
  • +1
Reactions: callisto and jabaduk
eating meat isn't toxic
 
  • +1
Reactions: callisto and jabaduk
smoking is worse
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0244007
risk = 1.13 and 1.51
35% increase in CVD death rate is insane. 25 % of all deaths are heart attacks
ch11f3.jpg
View attachment 1911373
ch11f2.jpg
 
We know meat is toxic. but how toxic vs cigarettes?
What are you even talking about? Meat is generally healthy. Especially organs.
 
  • +1
Reactions: callisto, mfk and Egzapho
Find when 1 pack a day (by age) outpaces high meat eating
 
What are you even talking about? Meat is generally healthy. Especially organs.
High nutrient density of organs is important so you can stay under the hazard saturated fat threshold but meat is the most toxic food you can eat
 
High nutrient density of organs is important so you can stay under the hazard saturated fat threshold but meat is the most toxic food you can eat
I think you are retarded.
 
  • +1
Reactions: callisto and spectacularpixlr
"All" food is "healthy' because meat and red meat swing the pendulum so far inm the unhealthy direction that candy and fried potatoes should be considered healthy.
Meat = toxic, dont risk your only life on it
 
  • JFL
Reactions: callisto
"All" food is "healthy' because meat and red meat swing the pendulum so far inm the unhealthy direction that candy and fried potatoes should be considered healthy.
Meat = toxic, dont risk your only life on it
A big problem with some of these carcinogenic studies / saturated fat studies is they don't differentiate between processed highly salted meats like cold cuts, and meats like grass fed organic beef or organic chicken.

The vast majority of the population gets their meat intake from processed cold cuts and industrial meats. Not grass fed beef.

It makes a major difference in how the animal was raised and what it was fed, in regards to its final nutritional profile (fatty acids, linoleic acid and other fat compounds)


Saying straight out meat causes cancer is not accurate - because these studies lump together the big mass of people who never eat actual meat (and instead eat overly processed frankenmeats with as much as 5g of salt per 100g of product leading to heart issues), and those who eat actual unprocessed meat which is then either lightly seasoned or just cooked to medium.


The only red meat I would avoid for health reasons altogether is pork - it just contains too much saturated fatty acid no matter what the animal was fed, to ever be good for your heart and health.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 69862, callisto, Sir Galachad and 2 others
A big problem with some of these carcinogenic studies / saturated fat studies is they don't differentiate between processed highly salted meats like cold cuts, and meats like grass fed organic beef or organic chicken.

The vast majority of the population gets their meat intake from processed cold cuts and industrial meats. Not grass fed beef.
True. Southern American countries eat more red meat then the US but have less traditionally red-meat associated cancers then the US, probably because the meat is very high quality.
 
  • +1
Reactions: callisto
What's wrong with meat now?
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 21863
IMG 20221016 131528

How surprising...
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: callisto, Egzapho and Deleted member 21863
Dont listen to these retarded idiotic kids. Meat is super toxic and will shorten ur lifespan just like cigarettes. There is not a more toxic thing between the two, both are toxic and you should avoid both, but Id say cigarettes are more toxic.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Crusile
Prove grass fed vs grain fed matters for outcomes (can't).

Gambling on low probability mechanism speculations when we know high linoleic acid pufas outperform meat
 
Pufa outcome data debunks omega ratios and meat quality
 
State of this forum
 
  • +1
Reactions: callisto
My record is 38 in a day it would have been 40 but I have 2 away
 
  • Love it
Reactions: Crusile
Prove grass fed vs grain fed matters for outcomes (can't).

Gambling on low probability mechanism speculations when we know high linoleic acid pufas outperform meat

Grass fed is just healthier overall, leaner and has a better fatty acid profile when it comes to heart health.

It's also more expensive - the only reason all meat isn't grass fed.

Very high fat meats always have bad heart health outcomes though, for example bacon.
I would never eat it as a daily food let alone breakfast, it's best left as a rare treat.

Meat itself isn't the problem; It's 1. the amount of fat contained in it and 2. the quality of that fat which cause coronary disease, plaque buildup, high blood pressure etc. (combine this with the high amount of salt in processed high fat meats like sausages, and you have disaster at hand)

Again, the problem is these studies don't differentiate a 35% fat pork sausage that has 9 grams of salt in it from a 250g grass fed unsalted marbled sirloin steak that has 10% fat. They just study overall meat consumption. Most meat people consume is garbage.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 69862
smoking is healthy if u smoke organic tobacco and roll it yourself. anti smoking studies don't differentiate cig smoking and tobacco smoking
 

Grass fed is just healthier overall, leaner and has a better fatty acid profile when it comes to heart health.

It's also more expensive - the only reason all meat isn't grass fed.
Grass fed beef is a consumerist scam yes. grass fed butter is even worse for $/calorie/nutrients and calorie/nutrient
 

Similar threads

iblameweight
Replies
26
Views
906
persuss
persuss
slavicpsycho
Replies
87
Views
903
Praxxis
Praxxis
WhoTookVendetta
Replies
7
Views
118
WhoTookVendetta
WhoTookVendetta
stress
Replies
5
Views
265
chasing aesthetics
chasing aesthetics

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top