Is there a lookslevel at which you can insult other people's looks while receiving the least pushback for it?

[6ft4]

Lets say you're in an argument with someone, whether it be in front of a few people irl or online for lots of people to potentially see.
The person you're arguing with has faical flaws and perhaps they make things personal with you so you feel like it's just too easy to destroy them given your precise knowledge on everything that's wrong with their face.
Is there a looks level for the eviscerater where the pushback against eviscerating them would be at it's lowest?
If you have flaws yourself its too easy to come back at you so presumably LTN and MTN will always be ruled out
Not all MTNs will necessarily have flaws that can be pointed to but just the fact of them looking average would allow the leeway for people to come back at them and call them ugly and have enough people agree because it's easy to consider an average looking person that you dislike as ugly

I would say that eviscerating someone when you are a Chad is seen as very distasteful because anyone who witnesses it will think "he could've done the same to me as well" because they know the Chad mogs them brutally so they think that Chad should be held to a higher standard than insulting the looks of others since he won the lottery. People will think you are punching down TOO hard, almost like a tall male mocking a midget for his height (its more to be expected from an average height male but a tall male doing it just seems more evil)
Or like a richcel mocking and bullying a homeless man, if a guy on welfare or minimum wage was fucking with a homeless man it's would still be bad but they are still somewhat in the same boat due to being at the low end of society so it wouldnt be as distasteful as a richcel who had everything he needs bullying a homeless man.

So this leaves Chadlites and HTNs with the potential to eviscerate someone for their looks and get off scot free.
I'm not sure what caused this to start but I was drunk after a night out and I was arguing with some chav foids outside a chipper and immitating their voices and they were getting pissed off trying to insult me and they legit had no ammo on me. I thought they could've noticed I had some scars or that I had an underbite but when I told them that they're ugly without makeup the only refute they had for me was that I had an ear piercing jfl, which is something that appeals mostly to chav foids more than other kinds of foids anyway.
I was waiting for my flaws to be highlighted and they weren't

This leads me to belief that HTN is enough to get away with insulting someone's looks without normies having ammo to hit back at you with, it would be best if you have no flaws though so fixing my underbite should've removed some ammo against me even though normies are bad at describing mild underbites.

One caveat is that if you look like you could be mistaken for 30, your age can be used against you and "old" can be used as an insult to describe you so you want to be a young looking HTN.
I am not sure if a Chadlite insulting some LTN would work the same way as a HTN insulting some LTN or if people would assume the Chadlite to have some hidden insecurity to be bashing the looks of others while he is objectively GL so shouldn't really care

It may be a case where a Chadlite insulting the looks of a MTN would sting whereas a HTN insulting the looks of a MTN wouldn't fly as well and wouldn't sting as hard because the difference isn't that drastic.

 

[Clavicular]

Its more about frame and height mogging to get away with this, while having no blatant facial failos that normies can make fun of

 

[anthony111553]

Its more about frame and height mogging to get away with this, while having no blatant facial failos that normies can make fun of

niggas gonna cook me for my big forehead, it's over

 

[Dominicoon]

Plethora of words for a simple answer

 

[greycel]

1. There’s more factors to this than disparities between PSL ratings
2. Equivalent Appeal rarities would be a better indicator than PSL
3. Appeal would likely have an effect on how much/ how far they are willing to go to insult you, how much energy.. in addition to factors like how high trust/low trust you are
4. You’ll likely need to be much more high trust than comparative low trust for women to feel bad for you and not go in on you. Low trust to the point that the women feels somewhat threatened will be enough for her to tread cautiously if not inebriated
5. You should not have any falios (relative to societal ideals), at which point your appeal rating is likely in the HTN tier (old school definition)
6. A high trust Chadlite is likely least susceptible to backlash following the exchange. Somebody who they see day to day as one of the best looking people
7. A low trust MTN - moderately low trust HTN will be the equivalent
8. There will be more variance the higher the looks level you go, as you become rarer and rarer, and women and men are not able to relate you to somebody they have met before. There will be less similar reactions if Meeks decides to insult them.
9. From HTN, it drops all the way down to Chad then there’s an uprise as you become so rare that people believe you’re entitled to have your view in something that is looks based (they limit you to looks [largely exclusively], subconsciously). E.g. Gigachad or Hexum/Drago tier (variance in reaction will be night and day.. some women will hit on you for acknowledging their presence likely after subjective Mid Chad for them).
10. Don’t expect all normie women to be aware of what an underbite is. They might see it and understand it but it’s inexplicable

 

[tyronechadmax]

it's easy to consider an average looking person that you dislike as ugly

This is so true, especially for women.

 

[ihatereddit]

6' chadlite+ or 6'4 HTN+
anything lower u will be clowned on