İslam İs Not Religion Of Terrorism

[Htnn]

Even if terrorists have Muslim names and their IDs say "Muslim", the murders they commit cannot be called "Islamic terrorism".

In the same way, if they are Christian, it cannot be called "Christian terrorism" or if they are Jewish, it cannot be called "Jewish terrorism". Because the killing of innocent people in the name of a divine religion is unacceptable.

By misinterpreting the holy books sent down by Allah to call people to peace and brotherhood, and by legitimizing violence against those who think differently from them with the superstitious beliefs they later put forward, these people are actually opposing the commands of religion.
A person who believes in religion and has love and fear of Allah can never do such a thing.

Regardless of which religion the perpetrators of such an atrocity claim to belong to, they may be doing this either out of ignorance, or to exploit religion for their own interests, or because of their hostility towards religion. Because after these violent incidents,
people become estranged from religion, and hatred and reactions are formed against religious people. Therefore, every attack against innocent people under the name of "religion" is actually an attack against religion.

Religion commands love, mercy and peace. Terrorism is the opposite of religion; it is merciless, it wants to shed blood, kill and make people suffer. Therefore, when looking for the perpetrator of a terrorist act, the source should not be sought in religiosity, but in irreligiosity or in radical views that completely misinterpret the commands of religion. The root of the incident should be sought in people with fascist, communist, racist, materialist, radical and bigoted thoughts. It does not matter what the terrorists' names are or what is written on their IDs. If a person kills innocent people without blinking, it is not possible for this person to represent any divine religion. Therefore, the concept of "Islamic terror" is a form of expression that is contrary to the essence of Islam. Because there is no place for terrorism in the religion of Islam. On the contrary, according to Islam, the acts we call "terrorism" (i.e. murders committed against innocent people) are a great crime and sin, and moreover, Muslims are responsible for preventing these acts and bringing peace, tranquility and justice to the world.
Some people who claim to have emerged in the name of a religion may be misunderstanding and practicing that religion incorrectly. Therefore, it would be extremely wrong to form an opinion or make a judgment about a religion based on people's behavior. The most accurate way to get to know a religion is to examine the sacred source of that religion. The sacred source of Islam is the Quran. Quranic morality is based on the concepts of love, compassion, mercy, modesty, sacrifice and peace. A Muslim who truly lives this morality is an extremely polite, thoughtful, modest, just, trustworthy and harmonious person. He/she spreads love, respect, peace and joy of life to those around him/her. Despite this fact, the Quran and Islam have recently been associated with the word "fear" and Islamophobia has become widespread. However, the source of people's fears is not Islam, but the religion of bigotry. Radicals who emerge in the name of Islam and Islamophobes who fear these radicals are actually in the same mistake. Both of these groups have failed to understand that true Islam has nothing to do with the frightening, loveless and hateful religion of bigotry.

That is why it is of great importance to explain the true meaning of Islam in the Quran and to reveal the mistakes of those who try to combine terrorism with Islam.

 

[T50frompitsofhell]

Why is the Qur'an so boring that i burnt it?

 

[Petsmart]

The passage argues that terrorism should never be associated with any religion—whether Islam, Christianity, or Judaism—because true religion, especially Islam as taught in the Quran, promotes peace, love, and compassion. It explains that terrorists who claim religious justification are either misinterpreting or deliberately exploiting religion for personal or political reasons, and their actions actually harm the image of faith itself. Therefore, labeling such acts as “Islamic terrorism” is misleading and unjust, as Islam fundamentally condemns violence against innocent people.

 

[2025cel]

There's no religion which is completely pacifist and harmless.

 

[Paul7]

islam is high T

 

[Htnn]

There's no religion which is completely pacifist and harmless.

I Never Saw Allah Promoting Harm İn Quran. Prove Me Wrong?

 

[Lefor3Laser]

Even if terrorists have Muslim names and their IDs say "Muslim", the murders they commit cannot be called "Islamic terrorism".

In the same way, if they are Christian, it cannot be called "Christian terrorism" or if they are Jewish, it cannot be called "Jewish terrorism". Because the killing of innocent people in the name of a divine religion is unacceptable.

By misinterpreting the holy books sent down by Allah to call people to peace and brotherhood, and by legitimizing violence against those who think differently from them with the superstitious beliefs they later put forward, these people are actually opposing the commands of religion.
A person who believes in religion and has love and fear of Allah can never do such a thing.

Regardless of which religion the perpetrators of such an atrocity claim to belong to, they may be doing this either out of ignorance, or to exploit religion for their own interests, or because of their hostility towards religion. Because after these violent incidents,
people become estranged from religion, and hatred and reactions are formed against religious people. Therefore, every attack against innocent people under the name of "religion" is actually an attack against religion.

Religion commands love, mercy and peace. Terrorism is the opposite of religion; it is merciless, it wants to shed blood, kill and make people suffer. Therefore, when looking for the perpetrator of a terrorist act, the source should not be sought in religiosity, but in irreligiosity or in radical views that completely misinterpret the commands of religion. The root of the incident should be sought in people with fascist, communist, racist, materialist, radical and bigoted thoughts. It does not matter what the terrorists' names are or what is written on their IDs. If a person kills innocent people without blinking, it is not possible for this person to represent any divine religion. Therefore, the concept of "Islamic terror" is a form of expression that is contrary to the essence of Islam. Because there is no place for terrorism in the religion of Islam. On the contrary, according to Islam, the acts we call "terrorism" (i.e. murders committed against innocent people) are a great crime and sin, and moreover, Muslims are responsible for preventing these acts and bringing peace, tranquility and justice to the world.
Some people who claim to have emerged in the name of a religion may be misunderstanding and practicing that religion incorrectly. Therefore, it would be extremely wrong to form an opinion or make a judgment about a religion based on people's behavior. The most accurate way to get to know a religion is to examine the sacred source of that religion. The sacred source of Islam is the Quran. Quranic morality is based on the concepts of love, compassion, mercy, modesty, sacrifice and peace. A Muslim who truly lives this morality is an extremely polite, thoughtful, modest, just, trustworthy and harmonious person. He/she spreads love, respect, peace and joy of life to those around him/her. Despite this fact, the Quran and Islam have recently been associated with the word "fear" and Islamophobia has become widespread. However, the source of people's fears is not Islam, but the religion of bigotry. Radicals who emerge in the name of Islam and Islamophobes who fear these radicals are actually in the same mistake. Both of these groups have failed to understand that true Islam has nothing to do with the frightening, loveless and hateful religion of bigotry.

That is why it is of great importance to explain the true meaning of Islam in the Quran and to reveal the mistakes of those who try to combine terrorism with Islam.

I mean you are partially right, but even before the jews intervening with muslim countries, muslims used to be cruel.

 

[borntokill]

isis promotes islam in denial they cut the heads off

 

[Lefor3Laser]

There's no religion which is completely pacifist and harmless.

There's few actually, but it depends on the humans again.

 

[2025cel]

There's few actually, but it depends on the humans again.

Buddhism, Hinduism, Jainism and Judaism?

 

[Htnn]

isis promotes islam in denial they cut the heads off

Isis Got Nothing to to with islam

 

[looksmaxxed]

yes blaming religion muddies the debate. the problem is their race. and the solution is to stop letting them in, obviously. most islamic terrorism is being committed by people who are in the country legally. unless we can justify such a need for kebabs and bad taxi drivers, there's zero reason why that risk should be taken.

 

[Htnn]

muslims used to be cruel.

İf A Muslim İs Cruel, He is not A Real Muslim.

 

[borntokill]

Isis Got Nothing to to with islam

Islamic state Iraq and Syria

 

[Htnn]

Islamic state Iraq and Syria

I mean We Denounce İsis

 

[loyolaxavvierretard]

Even if terrorists have Muslim names and their IDs say "Muslim", the murders they commit cannot be called "Islamic terrorism".

In the same way, if they are Christian, it cannot be called "Christian terrorism" or if they are Jewish, it cannot be called "Jewish terrorism". Because the killing of innocent people in the name of a divine religion is unacceptable.

By misinterpreting the holy books sent down by Allah to call people to peace and brotherhood, and by legitimizing violence against those who think differently from them with the superstitious beliefs they later put forward, these people are actually opposing the commands of religion.
A person who believes in religion and has love and fear of Allah can never do such a thing.

Regardless of which religion the perpetrators of such an atrocity claim to belong to, they may be doing this either out of ignorance, or to exploit religion for their own interests, or because of their hostility towards religion. Because after these violent incidents,
people become estranged from religion, and hatred and reactions are formed against religious people. Therefore, every attack against innocent people under the name of "religion" is actually an attack against religion.

Religion commands love, mercy and peace. Terrorism is the opposite of religion; it is merciless, it wants to shed blood, kill and make people suffer. Therefore, when looking for the perpetrator of a terrorist act, the source should not be sought in religiosity, but in irreligiosity or in radical views that completely misinterpret the commands of religion. The root of the incident should be sought in people with fascist, communist, racist, materialist, radical and bigoted thoughts. It does not matter what the terrorists' names are or what is written on their IDs. If a person kills innocent people without blinking, it is not possible for this person to represent any divine religion. Therefore, the concept of "Islamic terror" is a form of expression that is contrary to the essence of Islam. Because there is no place for terrorism in the religion of Islam. On the contrary, according to Islam, the acts we call "terrorism" (i.e. murders committed against innocent people) are a great crime and sin, and moreover, Muslims are responsible for preventing these acts and bringing peace, tranquility and justice to the world.
Some people who claim to have emerged in the name of a religion may be misunderstanding and practicing that religion incorrectly. Therefore, it would be extremely wrong to form an opinion or make a judgment about a religion based on people's behavior. The most accurate way to get to know a religion is to examine the sacred source of that religion. The sacred source of Islam is the Quran. Quranic morality is based on the concepts of love, compassion, mercy, modesty, sacrifice and peace. A Muslim who truly lives this morality is an extremely polite, thoughtful, modest, just, trustworthy and harmonious person. He/she spreads love, respect, peace and joy of life to those around him/her. Despite this fact, the Quran and Islam have recently been associated with the word "fear" and Islamophobia has become widespread. However, the source of people's fears is not Islam, but the religion of bigotry. Radicals who emerge in the name of Islam and Islamophobes who fear these radicals are actually in the same mistake. Both of these groups have failed to understand that true Islam has nothing to do with the frightening, loveless and hateful religion of bigotry.

That is why it is of great importance to explain the true meaning of Islam in the Quran and to reveal the mistakes of those who try to combine terrorism with Islam.

religions do like loving children in the wrong way

 

[Lefor3Laser]

Buddhism, Hinduism, Jainism and Judaism?

And much more religions, but they are minority though

 

[Lefor3Laser]

İf A Muslim İs Cruel, He is not A Real Muslim.

Alright here's a thing that happened, in Iraq after Saddam fell, there were shias and sunni murdering eachother, but not just them though, even minor religions in Iraq like mizrawi jews, druz, mandeans, yazidi, etc.

So by that meaning they aren't muslim?, what about Syria?, they are killing alawite now, same that alawite did, so the muslims in Syria aren't muslim?, same applies to most muslim countries.

 

[Htnn]

Alright here's a thing that happened, in Iraq after Saddam fell, there were shias and sunni murdering eachother, but not just them though, even minor religions in Iraq like mizrawi jews, druz, mandeans, yazidi, etc.

So by that meaning they aren't muslim?, what about Syria?, they are killing alawite now, same that alawite did, so the muslims in Syria aren't muslim?, same applies to most muslim countries.

Unfortunately Yes. Same Applies to most muslim countries.

 

[Htnn]

religions do like loving children in the wrong way

İf You Mean Pedophility, No. İslam Doesn't

 

[loyolaxavvierretard]

İf You Mean Pedophility, No. İslam Doesn't

The prophet sure does

 

[Htnn]

The prophet sure does

Only Hadiths Say İt. Quran Doesn't. Hadiths Were Written Down 200+ Years Later After The Prophet's Death. Which Means They're Mostly Cope. We Shouldn't Rely On Hadiths. İn Fact, Quran İtself İs Enough to Live The Religion. I Can Explain İt Further More Though.

 

[looksmaxxed]

who made you the authority on islam, op?

 

[Htnn]

who made you the authority on islam, op?

View attachment 3595792

Quran

 

[PrinceLuenLeoncur]

Even if terrorists have Muslim names and their IDs say "Muslim", the murders they commit cannot be called "Islamic terrorism".

In the same way, if they are Christian, it cannot be called "Christian terrorism" or if they are Jewish, it cannot be called "Jewish terrorism". Because the killing of innocent people in the name of a divine religion is unacceptable.

By misinterpreting the holy books sent down by Allah to call people to peace and brotherhood, and by legitimizing violence against those who think differently from them with the superstitious beliefs they later put forward, these people are actually opposing the commands of religion.
A person who believes in religion and has love and fear of Allah can never do such a thing.

Regardless of which religion the perpetrators of such an atrocity claim to belong to, they may be doing this either out of ignorance, or to exploit religion for their own interests, or because of their hostility towards religion. Because after these violent incidents,
people become estranged from religion, and hatred and reactions are formed against religious people. Therefore, every attack against innocent people under the name of "religion" is actually an attack against religion.

Religion commands love, mercy and peace. Terrorism is the opposite of religion; it is merciless, it wants to shed blood, kill and make people suffer. Therefore, when looking for the perpetrator of a terrorist act, the source should not be sought in religiosity, but in irreligiosity or in radical views that completely misinterpret the commands of religion. The root of the incident should be sought in people with fascist, communist, racist, materialist, radical and bigoted thoughts. It does not matter what the terrorists' names are or what is written on their IDs. If a person kills innocent people without blinking, it is not possible for this person to represent any divine religion. Therefore, the concept of "Islamic terror" is a form of expression that is contrary to the essence of Islam. Because there is no place for terrorism in the religion of Islam. On the contrary, according to Islam, the acts we call "terrorism" (i.e. murders committed against innocent people) are a great crime and sin, and moreover, Muslims are responsible for preventing these acts and bringing peace, tranquility and justice to the world.
Some people who claim to have emerged in the name of a religion may be misunderstanding and practicing that religion incorrectly. Therefore, it would be extremely wrong to form an opinion or make a judgment about a religion based on people's behavior. The most accurate way to get to know a religion is to examine the sacred source of that religion. The sacred source of Islam is the Quran. Quranic morality is based on the concepts of love, compassion, mercy, modesty, sacrifice and peace. A Muslim who truly lives this morality is an extremely polite, thoughtful, modest, just, trustworthy and harmonious person. He/she spreads love, respect, peace and joy of life to those around him/her. Despite this fact, the Quran and Islam have recently been associated with the word "fear" and Islamophobia has become widespread. However, the source of people's fears is not Islam, but the religion of bigotry. Radicals who emerge in the name of Islam and Islamophobes who fear these radicals are actually in the same mistake. Both of these groups have failed to understand that true Islam has nothing to do with the frightening, loveless and hateful religion of bigotry.

That is why it is of great importance to explain the true meaning of Islam in the Quran and to reveal the mistakes of those who try to combine terrorism with Islam.

Islam teaches to kill non Muslims if they don’t submit to sharia…. It’s literally part of their doctrine the only reason why Muslims aren’t arent all murderous cunts is because not all Muslims know their religion very well and are a minority and Mohammed said as a minority to live amoungst the Kuffar in peace.


So yes Islams a religion of terrorism because that’s what the religion preaches no matter what cope you have to say the evidence is in the pudding.

 

[PrinceLuenLeoncur]

I mean you are partially right, but even before the jews intervening with muslim countries, muslims used to be cruel.

Sura 9:29

 

[Stranger to myself]

Even if terrorists have Muslim names and their IDs say "Muslim", the murders they commit cannot be called "Islamic terrorism".

In the same way, if they are Christian, it cannot be called "Christian terrorism" or if they are Jewish, it cannot be called "Jewish terrorism". Because the killing of innocent people in the name of a divine religion is unacceptable.

By misinterpreting the holy books sent down by Allah to call people to peace and brotherhood, and by legitimizing violence against those who think differently from them with the superstitious beliefs they later put forward, these people are actually opposing the commands of religion.
A person who believes in religion and has love and fear of Allah can never do such a thing.

Regardless of which religion the perpetrators of such an atrocity claim to belong to, they may be doing this either out of ignorance, or to exploit religion for their own interests, or because of their hostility towards religion. Because after these violent incidents,
people become estranged from religion, and hatred and reactions are formed against religious people. Therefore, every attack against innocent people under the name of "religion" is actually an attack against religion.

Religion commands love, mercy and peace. Terrorism is the opposite of religion; it is merciless, it wants to shed blood, kill and make people suffer. Therefore, when looking for the perpetrator of a terrorist act, the source should not be sought in religiosity, but in irreligiosity or in radical views that completely misinterpret the commands of religion. The root of the incident should be sought in people with fascist, communist, racist, materialist, radical and bigoted thoughts. It does not matter what the terrorists' names are or what is written on their IDs. If a person kills innocent people without blinking, it is not possible for this person to represent any divine religion. Therefore, the concept of "Islamic terror" is a form of expression that is contrary to the essence of Islam. Because there is no place for terrorism in the religion of Islam. On the contrary, according to Islam, the acts we call "terrorism" (i.e. murders committed against innocent people) are a great crime and sin, and moreover, Muslims are responsible for preventing these acts and bringing peace, tranquility and justice to the world.
Some people who claim to have emerged in the name of a religion may be misunderstanding and practicing that religion incorrectly. Therefore, it would be extremely wrong to form an opinion or make a judgment about a religion based on people's behavior. The most accurate way to get to know a religion is to examine the sacred source of that religion. The sacred source of Islam is the Quran. Quranic morality is based on the concepts of love, compassion, mercy, modesty, sacrifice and peace. A Muslim who truly lives this morality is an extremely polite, thoughtful, modest, just, trustworthy and harmonious person. He/she spreads love, respect, peace and joy of life to those around him/her. Despite this fact, the Quran and Islam have recently been associated with the word "fear" and Islamophobia has become widespread. However, the source of people's fears is not Islam, but the religion of bigotry. Radicals who emerge in the name of Islam and Islamophobes who fear these radicals are actually in the same mistake. Both of these groups have failed to understand that true Islam has nothing to do with the frightening, loveless and hateful religion of bigotry.

That is why it is of great importance to explain the true meaning of Islam in the Quran and to reveal the mistakes of those who try to combine terrorism with Islam.

Pharma grade copium

 

[PrinceLuenLeoncur]

who made you the authority on islam, op?

View attachment 3595792

And this is why the Bible says “women cannot and should not be clergy”


When idiots ask why it’s because of this

 

[Amin]

all religion are cope there's nothing after death and Islam is the most evil religion there is

 

[Lefor3Laser]

Sura 9:29

This is what i said basically

Alright here's a thing that happened, in Iraq after Saddam fell, there were shias and sunni murdering eachother, but not just them though, even minor religions in Iraq like mizrawi jews, druz, mandeans, yazidi, etc.

So by that meaning they aren't muslim?, what about Syria?, they are killing alawite now, same that alawite did, so the muslims in Syria aren't muslim?, same applies to most muslim countries.

 

[Lefor3Laser]

all religion are cope there's nothing after death and Islam is the most evil religion there is

They are the same shit, judaism and islam are hand in hand.

 

[Amin]

They are the same shit, judaism and islam are hand in hand.

yeah being religious of any kind is just low iq

 

[psychomandible]

The fact that the term jihad exist disproves the point you're trying to make.

 

[Lefor3Laser]

yeah being religious of any kind is just low iq

It's still better, you would see killings every moment.

 

[Amin]

It's still better, you would see killings every moment.

if it wasn't for the law there would be killings every moment in the name of god but that's true to some extent

 

[Htnn]

Islam teaches to kill non Muslims if they don’t submit to sharia…. It’s literally part of their doctrine the only reason why Muslims aren’t arent all murderous cunts is because not all Muslims know their religion very well and are a minority and Mohammed said as a minority to live amoungst the Kuffar in peace.


So yes Islams a religion of terrorism because that’s what the religion preaches no matter what cope you have to say the evidence is in the pudding.

Sura 9:29

Pathetic Argument

 

[Htnn]

The fact that the term jihad exist disproves the point you're trying to make.

Im Afraid Jihad İs Not About Killing People.

 

[PrinceLuenLeoncur]

Pathetic Argument

Not a high IQ thread Ibn Kathir states that sura 9:29 is a declaration on the Kafir for not believing in Allah nor his messenger. Learn your fuckin Deen, bitch

Jihad is the material state of Islam that’s why one Mohammed died the Sahaba declared jihad on the Eastern romans and Sassanids.

Listen to your fucking Quran and stop lying and running Taqiyya on us

Also sura 4:34 says to strike a bitch if you fear disobedience stfu about women having rights you cleared up nothing your religion is vile and from hell that’s that. Sura 4:24 allows you to take women as sex slaves LOL. So much for MUH female rights


And this isn’t even about sura 65:4 which allows raping little girls

Refute this or stfu


Your own expositors agree with me.

 

[Sonneillon]

Even if terrorists have Muslim names and their IDs say "Muslim", the murders they commit cannot be called "Islamic terrorism".

In the same way, if they are Christian, it cannot be called "Christian terrorism" or if they are Jewish, it cannot be called "Jewish terrorism". Because the killing of innocent people in the name of a divine religion is unacceptable.

By misinterpreting the holy books sent down by Allah to call people to peace and brotherhood, and by legitimizing violence against those who think differently from them with the superstitious beliefs they later put forward, these people are actually opposing the commands of religion.
A person who believes in religion and has love and fear of Allah can never do such a thing.

Regardless of which religion the perpetrators of such an atrocity claim to belong to, they may be doing this either out of ignorance, or to exploit religion for their own interests, or because of their hostility towards religion. Because after these violent incidents,
people become estranged from religion, and hatred and reactions are formed against religious people. Therefore, every attack against innocent people under the name of "religion" is actually an attack against religion.

Religion commands love, mercy and peace. Terrorism is the opposite of religion; it is merciless, it wants to shed blood, kill and make people suffer. Therefore, when looking for the perpetrator of a terrorist act, the source should not be sought in religiosity, but in irreligiosity or in radical views that completely misinterpret the commands of religion. The root of the incident should be sought in people with fascist, communist, racist, materialist, radical and bigoted thoughts. It does not matter what the terrorists' names are or what is written on their IDs. If a person kills innocent people without blinking, it is not possible for this person to represent any divine religion. Therefore, the concept of "Islamic terror" is a form of expression that is contrary to the essence of Islam. Because there is no place for terrorism in the religion of Islam. On the contrary, according to Islam, the acts we call "terrorism" (i.e. murders committed against innocent people) are a great crime and sin, and moreover, Muslims are responsible for preventing these acts and bringing peace, tranquility and justice to the world.
Some people who claim to have emerged in the name of a religion may be misunderstanding and practicing that religion incorrectly. Therefore, it would be extremely wrong to form an opinion or make a judgment about a religion based on people's behavior. The most accurate way to get to know a religion is to examine the sacred source of that religion. The sacred source of Islam is the Quran. Quranic morality is based on the concepts of love, compassion, mercy, modesty, sacrifice and peace. A Muslim who truly lives this morality is an extremely polite, thoughtful, modest, just, trustworthy and harmonious person. He/she spreads love, respect, peace and joy of life to those around him/her. Despite this fact, the Quran and Islam have recently been associated with the word "fear" and Islamophobia has become widespread. However, the source of people's fears is not Islam, but the religion of bigotry. Radicals who emerge in the name of Islam and Islamophobes who fear these radicals are actually in the same mistake. Both of these groups have failed to understand that true Islam has nothing to do with the frightening, loveless and hateful religion of bigotry.

That is why it is of great importance to explain the true meaning of Islam in the Quran and to reveal the mistakes of those who try to combine terrorism with Islam.

People are going to make fun of it but it's true, the whole idea of muslims being terrorists is just to create division while they can put their orchestrated rituals like 9/11 on the blame of "muslims" just like how they put the blame on "jews" when they're zionists

 

[PrinceLuenLeoncur]

The fact that the term jihad exist disproves the point you're trying to make.

The faggot is now saying jihad isn’t about killing peopel. But what he won’t tel you is that there is 2 jihad, lesser and greater

Lesser Jihad is the one where you slaughter the infidel

Greater jihad is the one for being modest, pious and growing in your deen over Dunya.

He knows this but once again Mohammedens run Taquiyya on the Kafir as their god is “Al Makr” aka greatest of deceivers so he’s just following his god

 

[deformed subhuman]

Even if terrorists have Muslim names and their IDs say "Muslim", the murders they commit cannot be called "Islamic terrorism".

In the same way, if they are Christian, it cannot be called "Christian terrorism" or if they are Jewish, it cannot be called "Jewish terrorism". Because the killing of innocent people in the name of a divine religion is unacceptable.

By misinterpreting the holy books sent down by Allah to call people to peace and brotherhood, and by legitimizing violence against those who think differently from them with the superstitious beliefs they later put forward, these people are actually opposing the commands of religion.
A person who believes in religion and has love and fear of Allah can never do such a thing.

Regardless of which religion the perpetrators of such an atrocity claim to belong to, they may be doing this either out of ignorance, or to exploit religion for their own interests, or because of their hostility towards religion. Because after these violent incidents,
people become estranged from religion, and hatred and reactions are formed against religious people. Therefore, every attack against innocent people under the name of "religion" is actually an attack against religion.

Religion commands love, mercy and peace. Terrorism is the opposite of religion; it is merciless, it wants to shed blood, kill and make people suffer. Therefore, when looking for the perpetrator of a terrorist act, the source should not be sought in religiosity, but in irreligiosity or in radical views that completely misinterpret the commands of religion. The root of the incident should be sought in people with fascist, communist, racist, materialist, radical and bigoted thoughts. It does not matter what the terrorists' names are or what is written on their IDs. If a person kills innocent people without blinking, it is not possible for this person to represent any divine religion. Therefore, the concept of "Islamic terror" is a form of expression that is contrary to the essence of Islam. Because there is no place for terrorism in the religion of Islam. On the contrary, according to Islam, the acts we call "terrorism" (i.e. murders committed against innocent people) are a great crime and sin, and moreover, Muslims are responsible for preventing these acts and bringing peace, tranquility and justice to the world.
Some people who claim to have emerged in the name of a religion may be misunderstanding and practicing that religion incorrectly. Therefore, it would be extremely wrong to form an opinion or make a judgment about a religion based on people's behavior. The most accurate way to get to know a religion is to examine the sacred source of that religion. The sacred source of Islam is the Quran. Quranic morality is based on the concepts of love, compassion, mercy, modesty, sacrifice and peace. A Muslim who truly lives this morality is an extremely polite, thoughtful, modest, just, trustworthy and harmonious person. He/she spreads love, respect, peace and joy of life to those around him/her. Despite this fact, the Quran and Islam have recently been associated with the word "fear" and Islamophobia has become widespread. However, the source of people's fears is not Islam, but the religion of bigotry. Radicals who emerge in the name of Islam and Islamophobes who fear these radicals are actually in the same mistake. Both of these groups have failed to understand that true Islam has nothing to do with the frightening, loveless and hateful religion of bigotry.

That is why it is of great importance to explain the true meaning of Islam in the Quran and to reveal the mistakes of those who try to combine terrorism with Islam.

dnr

 

[Alias!]

Even if terrorists have Muslim names and their IDs say "Muslim", the murders they commit cannot be called "Islamic terrorism".

In the same way, if they are Christian, it cannot be called "Christian terrorism" or if they are Jewish, it cannot be called "Jewish terrorism". Because the killing of innocent people in the name of a divine religion is unacceptable.

By misinterpreting the holy books sent down by Allah to call people to peace and brotherhood, and by legitimizing violence against those who think differently from them with the superstitious beliefs they later put forward, these people are actually opposing the commands of religion.
A person who believes in religion and has love and fear of Allah can never do such a thing.

Regardless of which religion the perpetrators of such an atrocity claim to belong to, they may be doing this either out of ignorance, or to exploit religion for their own interests, or because of their hostility towards religion. Because after these violent incidents,
people become estranged from religion, and hatred and reactions are formed against religious people. Therefore, every attack against innocent people under the name of "religion" is actually an attack against religion.

Religion commands love, mercy and peace. Terrorism is the opposite of religion; it is merciless, it wants to shed blood, kill and make people suffer. Therefore, when looking for the perpetrator of a terrorist act, the source should not be sought in religiosity, but in irreligiosity or in radical views that completely misinterpret the commands of religion. The root of the incident should be sought in people with fascist, communist, racist, materialist, radical and bigoted thoughts. It does not matter what the terrorists' names are or what is written on their IDs. If a person kills innocent people without blinking, it is not possible for this person to represent any divine religion. Therefore, the concept of "Islamic terror" is a form of expression that is contrary to the essence of Islam. Because there is no place for terrorism in the religion of Islam. On the contrary, according to Islam, the acts we call "terrorism" (i.e. murders committed against innocent people) are a great crime and sin, and moreover, Muslims are responsible for preventing these acts and bringing peace, tranquility and justice to the world.
Some people who claim to have emerged in the name of a religion may be misunderstanding and practicing that religion incorrectly. Therefore, it would be extremely wrong to form an opinion or make a judgment about a religion based on people's behavior. The most accurate way to get to know a religion is to examine the sacred source of that religion. The sacred source of Islam is the Quran. Quranic morality is based on the concepts of love, compassion, mercy, modesty, sacrifice and peace. A Muslim who truly lives this morality is an extremely polite, thoughtful, modest, just, trustworthy and harmonious person. He/she spreads love, respect, peace and joy of life to those around him/her. Despite this fact, the Quran and Islam have recently been associated with the word "fear" and Islamophobia has become widespread. However, the source of people's fears is not Islam, but the religion of bigotry. Radicals who emerge in the name of Islam and Islamophobes who fear these radicals are actually in the same mistake. Both of these groups have failed to understand that true Islam has nothing to do with the frightening, loveless and hateful religion of bigotry.

That is why it is of great importance to explain the true meaning of Islam in the Quran and to reveal the mistakes of those who try to combine terrorism with Islam.

 

[psychomandible]

Im Afraid Jihad İs Not About Killing People.

Yeah you're either a fake Muslim retarded or just lying

 

[Htnn]

Not a high IQ thread Ibn Kathir states that sura 9:29 is a declaration on the Kafir for not believing in Allah nor his messenger. Learn your fuckin Deen, bitch

Jihad is the material state of Islam that’s why one Mohammed died the Sahaba declared jihad on the Eastern romans and Sassanids.

Listen to your fucking Quran and stop lying and running Taqiyya on us

The verses in the Quran regarding war are deliberately distorted and used by unbelievers. The expressions in the verses are interpreted differently by being separated from the main flow of the text. However, if these verses are evaluated according to the general logic of the Quran and the flow of the subject, the situation will become clearer. The verse in the At-Tawbah Surah is as follows:

Fight those of those who were given the Book who do not believe in Allah and the Last Day, who do not consider as forbidden what Allah and His Messenger have forbidden, and who do not adopt the true religion (Islam) until they are humiliated and pay the jizya with their own hands. (Surah At-Tawbah, 9:29)

If we pay attention to the expression in the verse, the people who are commanded to fight here are not all the people of the Book. They are a group of those who were given the Book. The reason for wanting to fight them is again because they are fighting Muslims. If the At-Tawbah Surah is read from the beginning, the subject will be better understood.

The verses regarding war should be evaluated within the integrity of the Quran. Contrary to all these claims, according to the Quran, war must be fought for defensive purposes. A war fought to conquer other people's lands cannot be a religious war according to the Quran. Throughout history, Islamic states may have waged some wars for the purpose of conquest. However, these were not all religious wars, but political wars. Allah forbids this type of war. The following is stated in the Surah al-Baqarah:

Fight in the way of Allah against those who fight you, but do not transgress. Indeed, Allah does not love those who transgress. Kill them wherever you find them, and expel them from wherever they expelled you. Fitnah is worse than killing. Do not fight them near the Sacred Mosque until they fight you. And if they fight you, then fight them. Such is the recompense of the disbelievers. If they cease, then Allah is Forgiving, Merciful. Fight them until there is no more fitnah (on earth) and the religion is Allah's. If they desist, there is no hostility against anyone except the oppressors. (Surah Al-Baqarah, 2:190-193)

As can be understood from these verses, war is only waged against those who fight. Moreover, Allah warns the believers not to go to extremes in this war. If the other party ends the war and asks for mercy during the war, Muslims comply and end the war. Jizya is taken as a result of the damage suffered from the war. Jizya comes from the root punishment and is compensation paid in war, not tax. Jizya is also evidence that a war of conquest was not fought. Because if there was a war of conquest, compensation cannot be demanded. The war compensation paid by the aggressor Germany after World War II is also called jizya. Jizya is a penalty that also exists in civil law.

We have seen in the above verses that war in the Quran is only for defensive purposes. Apart from this, when there is an attack, Allah wants Muslims to respond to this aggression and fight these aggressors with all their might. The verses in the At-Tawbah Surah are as follows:

Would you not fight against a people who break their oaths and who seek to drive out the Messenger and who have begun to fight against you? Are you afraid of them? Allah is more worthy of your fear, if you are believers. Fight them. May Allah rebuke them by your hands and humiliate them and grant you victory over them and heal the hearts of the community of believers and remove the anger from their hearts. Allah accepts the repentance of whomever He wills. Allah is All-Knowing, All-Wise. (Surah At-Tawbah 9:13-15)

It is clear that being determined and strong in war will both ensure that the war ends more quickly and set a deterrent example for possible wars. Responding to the aggressors and making them regret their actions will ultimately be the most correct way to preserve peace.

Apart from this, Allah also permits war for the weak, oppressed and needy people of the Muslims, again in order to protect them:
What is the matter with you that you do not fight in the way of Allah and on behalf of those who are weak, men, women and children, who say, “Our Lord, take us out of this land whose people are oppressors, and raise up for us a protector from Himself and raise up for us a helper from Himself”? (Surah An-Nisa, 4:75)

This kind of war is not born of violence, but of mercy. Islam advises believers to embrace and protect the oppressed against oppression. In the event of peace, Allah demands goodness and justice from the believers. The aim here is to protect and preserve peace against war:

Allah does not forbid you from doing good to those who do not fight you in religion and who have not driven you out of your homes, and from dealing justly with them. For Allah loves those who do justice. (Surah Al-Mumtahana, 60:8)

Regardless of the religion of the group you are dealing with, if they want to live in peace, the approach of believers towards them can only be a friendly approach according to the Quran. Therefore, when these verses are read and evaluated as a whole, there is no contradiction.

sura 4:34

In many cases, translations made under the influence of non-Quranic sources are thought to give permission to beat women in the Quran, which is read by people who read those translations. However, is this really the case? Let's look at the relevant verse.
Men are responsible for watching over women. Because Allah has given each of them different abilities and characteristics. As a matter of fact, the man is responsible for the livelihood of the house.

Virtuous women submit to (God's law) and protect (their honor and chastity) that God has ordered them to protect, even if they are alone. Advise the women whose honor and honor you are concerned about, separate your beds, and finally remove them. However, if they listen to you and give up, do not look for a way against them... (Surah Nisa, 34)

This verse has been distorted in four points during the period of corruption dominated by male despotism.

FIRST ERROR: The expression "erricalü kavvamune alennisai" in the verse should be translated as "men watch over women" or "men are responsible for the livelihood of women", but in almost all translations it is translated as "men have authority over women".

All translators unanimously translated the word "kavvam" as "ruler, judge". But for some reason, in 4-135 and 5-8, where the same word is used, they translated this word as "guarding, fulfilling, supporting".

SECOND ERROR: In Nisa 34, the meaning of the expression "feddelellahu badehum ala badin" is "We gave each of them different abilities and characteristics." However, in the translations, for some reason, it is translated as "Allah has made some (men) superior to some (women)."

The comment in parentheses that cannot be found in the Quran stems from the influence of hadith books that reflect the pagan medieval Arab culture. If the verse said "Allah has made men superior to women", it would have to be like this; faddalellahur ricae alen nisai.

When you send the pronoun "hum" in the word "badehum" (some) in the verse to only men, the meaning becomes: God has made some men superior to others. This does not comply with the text in which the verse is located.

When you refer the pronoun hum to a mixed group of men and women, the meaning is as follows: God has made some men and women superior to others.
The same words appear in 4-32 and 13-4. However, for some reason, it is translated as "He made some of you superior to others." The meaning of the verse is "God has given each of them different abilities and characteristics." There is no gender discrimination.

THIRD ERROR: In Nisa 34, the word "idribuhunne" is translated as "beat those women, lightly hit them" in all Turkish translations except a few.

In 30-21, it is said, "It is one of His signs that He created spouses for you from your kind so that you may find peace with them and placed love and mercy among you." It is said. As you can see, the purpose of marriage is peace based on love and mercy. It is debatable how much the man can provide this peace by beating the woman.

The root of the word "idribuhunne", which is translated as "beat them", is the verb "DaRaBa". If you look in any Arabic dictionary, you will see dozens of meanings under this word. This word is the word with the richest meaning in Arabic.

Verses in which the meaning of traveling is mentioned: 2-273, 3-156, 4-101
Verses in which it means hitting: 8-50, 47-27
Verses in which it means to reveal: 43-58, 47-27
Verses in which it is mentioned as an example: 14-24/45, 16-75/76, 16-112, 18-32/45
Exempting: 43-5,
Being sentenced: 2-61,
Closing, hitting: 18-11,
Explain: 13-17

As you can see, this word is used in many meanings in the Quran. There are also meanings that are not mentioned in the Quran. For example, in Arabic you make money "DaRaBa'". So you press.
For example, in the following verse, the verb darabe is used as giving up. “İdrip” is the imperative mood. The same verb is used in the imperative mood in verse 34 of Surah Nisa. And its meaning became "give up".
Should we stop sending you the message because you are an overstepping society? (Surat al-Dhukhruf, 5)

FOURTH ERROR: In Nisa 34, the word "nushuz" is translated as "bitchiness, disobedience" in almost all translations. However, this word means infidelity and immorality, ranging from dating to illegitimate sexual intercourse.

For example, in 4-128, the same word is used for the husband who is unfaithful. But for some reason, in that verse, it is not translated as disobedient husband.
In Nisa 34, it is explained what the man should do to the wife who is unfaithful and unchaste. First, warn him, then separate his bed, and if he continues, he is told to leave the house.

Beating a woman who betrays her man is not a solution anyway. When you take her out of the house, the woman is still the man's responsibility until the divorce. Even after divorce, the man protects and protects the woman.
In the 2nd verse of Surah Talak, two ways are shown in case of discord. Either to hold on with kindness, or to leave with beauty. If it is not possible to hold the woman with kindness, it is not said that you can beat her. On the contrary, it is said to leave with beauty. .
When they are near the end of their waiting period, either hold them with goodness and beauty, or separate them with beauty... (Surah Talak, 2) In the light of these examinations, the translation of the verse in question is as follows.....
.
Men are responsible for watching over women. Because God has given each of them different abilities and characteristics. As a matter of fact, the man is responsible for the livelihood of the house. Virtuous women submit to (God's law) and protect (their honor and chastity) that God has ordered them to protect, even if they are alone. Give advice to women whose honor and honor you are concerned about, separate your beds, and finally give up/separate. However, if they listen to you and give up, do not seek a way against them... (Surah Nisa, 34)

** Response to a possible objection: It is a frequently expressed objection that the verb "darabe" cannot be used metaphorically when used without a letter, so the command in verse 4:34 means "beat women" rather than "divorce women". When we examined the article ضرب -darabe- in Lisanu'l Arab, we saw the following example of the use of letter-i cersiz:

ضَرَبَ الدهْرُ بَيْنَنا أَي بَعَّدَ ما بَيْنَنا
Time has "hit" us. So he took us away. (Language,ضرب article)

As can be seen, the word "darabe" is used here without a letter-i cer, and Ibn Manzur states that the "darabe" here means "uzaklaştırma", that is, "uzaklaştırma", which is the meaning we give to verse 4:34.

sura 65:4

Some people with deviant views have confused people’s minds by seeking evidence from the Quran for their own deviance and by deriving forced rulings. I certainly absolve those who do this as a mistake. If you pay attention, all commentators are men. In the interpretations made by the mentality that considers it rude for a pregnant woman to go out, women have been pushed to the background and a male-dominated system has been established with small additions that completely change the meaning. Allah, who informs us of every detail in the Quran, has warned Muslims against people with this mentality in verse 78 of the Ali Imran chapter.

There are some among them who bend their tongues towards the book so that you may think it (these seem to read) is from the book, but it is not from the book. They say, “This is from Allah,” but it is not from Allah. They tell lies about Allah, while they know it. (Surah Ali Imran, 78)

One of the verses that serve this system and cause confusion is the 4th verse of the Surah At-Talaq, where words that cause misunderstanding are added intentionally or unintentionally. First, let's look at the traditional translation of this verse;

“The waiting period of those among you who have stopped menstruating and those who have not yet menstruated is three months - if you are in doubt (know that). And the waiting period of pregnant women is (ends with) laying down their burdens. And whoever fears Allah, He will make things easy for him.” (Surah At-Talaq, 4)
For some reason, the word “yet”, which does not exist in the original, was added to the verse from scratch. This tiny addition completely changed the meaning. When it is said “not yet menstruating”, only one thing comes to mind. That is, children who have not yet menstruated because they have not reached puberty! However, the situation is different.

In order to say that she has not menstruated yet, the word “ellaaiii lemma yahidne” must be used in the verse. However, the expression “lem yahidne” is used in the verse.

Lem: It gives the meaning that it will never happen or has not happened.

Lemma: It gives the meaning that it has not happened yet, but it will happen.

Let's continue to examine the 4th verse of the At-Talaq Surah. In the verse, the waiting period for women who have stopped menstruating, that is, who have entered menopause, is stated as 3 months. What is the reason for waiting 3 months? It is to understand whether the woman is pregnant or not. Can a child who does not menstruate get pregnant? No. In that case, there is no need to wait 3 months. A woman who becomes pregnant does not menstruate. However, it takes time to understand that she is pregnant. The waiting period for women in this situation is also 3 months. Those who are definitely pregnant wait until birth.

The expression “vellai lem yahidne”, which is translated as girls who have not menstruated in translations, is the condition medically called “secondary amenorrhea”. In other words, it refers to women who do not menstruate because their menstrual cycle is disrupted (who do not menstruate for a period of 3 months or more for various reasons, even though they normally menstruate).

Also, the word “Nisa” in the verse is a word used for adult women in the Quran. If the person who does not menstruate were a child, then the words “Vildan, Veled, Benat…” should have been used. However, the word “Nisa” used to describe adult women is used in the verse. And the correct translation that should be is as follows.

“If you have doubts about the waiting period of those among your women who have stopped menstruating (by entering menopause), their waiting period is three months. The same is true for those who do not menstruate. The waiting period of pregnant women ends when they give birth to their children. And whoever fears Allah and guards himself against Him, Allah will make things easy for him.” (Talak, 4)

Also in the 3rd verse of Surah Ikhlas, “Lem yelid and Lem yuled”
It was not effective in giving birth/did not inject sperm and was not born
Is the “Lem” particle in the 3rd verse of Surah Ikhlas, which says “did not give birth and was not born”, in the sense of YET?
In other words, did Allah; (God forbid) become a father or a child / did anyone give birth after Hz. Muhammad?
Or is Allah a being that gives birth and is born in any case?

In conclusion: The age of marriage in the Quran is stated in the 6th verse of Surah An-Nisa. “Test the orphans until they reach the age of marriage; if you see in them maturity, then give them their property…” (Surah an-Nisa, 6) If you read the verse carefully, it says, “Test the orphans until they reach the age of marriage”; if you see in them maturity, then give them their property. In Islamic law, the dowry is the money or property that a man gives to a woman when they get married. The dowry is given directly to the woman, not to her family. According to the verse above, the age at which the property is delivered to its owner is the age at which that person can control his property. Therefore, the woman who receives the dowry must be at an age at which she can control this property or money. In addition, the word “rüşd” is used for both men and women in the verse. This means “the ability to find the right path”. A small child may even have difficulty finding his way home. In short, the marriage age in the Quran is completely compatible with the marriage age in the civil law. Claiming otherwise is perversion. No one should seek evidence from the Quran for their own perversion!

 

[Htnn]

Yeah you're either a fake Muslim retarded or just lying

Im A Quranic Muslim

 

[PrinceLuenLeoncur]

The verses in the Quran regarding war are deliberately distorted and used by unbelievers. The expressions in the verses are interpreted differently by being separated from the main flow of the text. However, if these verses are evaluated according to the general logic of the Quran and the flow of the subject, the situation will become clearer. The verse in the At-Tawbah Surah is as follows:

Fight those of those who were given the Book who do not believe in Allah and the Last Day, who do not consider as forbidden what Allah and His Messenger have forbidden, and who do not adopt the true religion (Islam) until they are humiliated and pay the jizya with their own hands. (Surah At-Tawbah, 9:29)

If we pay attention to the expression in the verse, the people who are commanded to fight here are not all the people of the Book. They are a group of those who were given the Book. The reason for wanting to fight them is again because they are fighting Muslims. If the At-Tawbah Surah is read from the beginning, the subject will be better understood.

The verses regarding war should be evaluated within the integrity of the Quran. Contrary to all these claims, according to the Quran, war must be fought for defensive purposes. A war fought to conquer other people's lands cannot be a religious war according to the Quran. Throughout history, Islamic states may have waged some wars for the purpose of conquest. However, these were not all religious wars, but political wars. Allah forbids this type of war. The following is stated in the Surah al-Baqarah:

Fight in the way of Allah against those who fight you, but do not transgress. Indeed, Allah does not love those who transgress. Kill them wherever you find them, and expel them from wherever they expelled you. Fitnah is worse than killing. Do not fight them near the Sacred Mosque until they fight you. And if they fight you, then fight them. Such is the recompense of the disbelievers. If they cease, then Allah is Forgiving, Merciful. Fight them until there is no more fitnah (on earth) and the religion is Allah's. If they desist, there is no hostility against anyone except the oppressors. (Surah Al-Baqarah, 2:190-193)

As can be understood from these verses, war is only waged against those who fight. Moreover, Allah warns the believers not to go to extremes in this war. If the other party ends the war and asks for mercy during the war, Muslims comply and end the war. Jizya is taken as a result of the damage suffered from the war. Jizya comes from the root punishment and is compensation paid in war, not tax. Jizya is also evidence that a war of conquest was not fought. Because if there was a war of conquest, compensation cannot be demanded. The war compensation paid by the aggressor Germany after World War II is also called jizya. Jizya is a penalty that also exists in civil law.

We have seen in the above verses that war in the Quran is only for defensive purposes. Apart from this, when there is an attack, Allah wants Muslims to respond to this aggression and fight these aggressors with all their might. The verses in the At-Tawbah Surah are as follows:

Would you not fight against a people who break their oaths and who seek to drive out the Messenger and who have begun to fight against you? Are you afraid of them? Allah is more worthy of your fear, if you are believers. Fight them. May Allah rebuke them by your hands and humiliate them and grant you victory over them and heal the hearts of the community of believers and remove the anger from their hearts. Allah accepts the repentance of whomever He wills. Allah is All-Knowing, All-Wise. (Surah At-Tawbah 9:13-15)

It is clear that being determined and strong in war will both ensure that the war ends more quickly and set a deterrent example for possible wars. Responding to the aggressors and making them regret their actions will ultimately be the most correct way to preserve peace.

Apart from this, Allah also permits war for the weak, oppressed and needy people of the Muslims, again in order to protect them:
What is the matter with you that you do not fight in the way of Allah and on behalf of those who are weak, men, women and children, who say, “Our Lord, take us out of this land whose people are oppressors, and raise up for us a protector from Himself and raise up for us a helper from Himself”? (Surah An-Nisa, 4:75)

This kind of war is not born of violence, but of mercy. Islam advises believers to embrace and protect the oppressed against oppression. In the event of peace, Allah demands goodness and justice from the believers. The aim here is to protect and preserve peace against war:

Allah does not forbid you from doing good to those who do not fight you in religion and who have not driven you out of your homes, and from dealing justly with them. For Allah loves those who do justice. (Surah Al-Mumtahana, 60:8)

Regardless of the religion of the group you are dealing with, if they want to live in peace, the approach of believers towards them can only be a friendly approach according to the Quran. Therefore, when these verses are read and evaluated as a whole, there is no contradiction.

In many cases, translations made under the influence of non-Quranic sources are thought to give permission to beat women in the Quran, which is read by people who read those translations. However, is this really the case? Let's look at the relevant verse.
Men are responsible for watching over women. Because Allah has given each of them different abilities and characteristics. As a matter of fact, the man is responsible for the livelihood of the house.

Virtuous women submit to (God's law) and protect (their honor and chastity) that God has ordered them to protect, even if they are alone. Advise the women whose honor and honor you are concerned about, separate your beds, and finally remove them. However, if they listen to you and give up, do not look for a way against them... (Surah Nisa, 34)

This verse has been distorted in four points during the period of corruption dominated by male despotism.

FIRST ERROR: The expression "erricalü kavvamune alennisai" in the verse should be translated as "men watch over women" or "men are responsible for the livelihood of women", but in almost all translations it is translated as "men have authority over women".

All translators unanimously translated the word "kavvam" as "ruler, judge". But for some reason, in 4-135 and 5-8, where the same word is used, they translated this word as "guarding, fulfilling, supporting".

SECOND ERROR: In Nisa 34, the meaning of the expression "feddelellahu badehum ala badin" is "We gave each of them different abilities and characteristics." However, in the translations, for some reason, it is translated as "Allah has made some (men) superior to some (women)."

The comment in parentheses that cannot be found in the Quran stems from the influence of hadith books that reflect the pagan medieval Arab culture. If the verse said "Allah has made men superior to women", it would have to be like this; faddalellahur ricae alen nisai.

When you send the pronoun "hum" in the word "badehum" (some) in the verse to only men, the meaning becomes: God has made some men superior to others. This does not comply with the text in which the verse is located.

When you refer the pronoun hum to a mixed group of men and women, the meaning is as follows: God has made some men and women superior to others.
The same words appear in 4-32 and 13-4. However, for some reason, it is translated as "He made some of you superior to others." The meaning of the verse is "God has given each of them different abilities and characteristics." There is no gender discrimination.

THIRD ERROR: In Nisa 34, the word "idribuhunne" is translated as "beat those women, lightly hit them" in all Turkish translations except a few.

In 30-21, it is said, "It is one of His signs that He created spouses for you from your kind so that you may find peace with them and placed love and mercy among you." It is said. As you can see, the purpose of marriage is peace based on love and mercy. It is debatable how much the man can provide this peace by beating the woman.

The root of the word "idribuhunne", which is translated as "beat them", is the verb "DaRaBa". If you look in any Arabic dictionary, you will see dozens of meanings under this word. This word is the word with the richest meaning in Arabic.

Verses in which the meaning of traveling is mentioned: 2-273, 3-156, 4-101
Verses in which it means hitting: 8-50, 47-27
Verses in which it means to reveal: 43-58, 47-27
Verses in which it is mentioned as an example: 14-24/45, 16-75/76, 16-112, 18-32/45
Exempting: 43-5,
Being sentenced: 2-61,
Closing, hitting: 18-11,
Explain: 13-17

As you can see, this word is used in many meanings in the Quran. There are also meanings that are not mentioned in the Quran. For example, in Arabic you make money "DaRaBa'". So you press.
For example, in the following verse, the verb darabe is used as giving up. “İdrip” is the imperative mood. The same verb is used in the imperative mood in verse 34 of Surah Nisa. And its meaning became "give up".
Should we stop sending you the message because you are an overstepping society? (Surat al-Dhukhruf, 5)

FOURTH ERROR: In Nisa 34, the word "nushuz" is translated as "bitchiness, disobedience" in almost all translations. However, this word means infidelity and immorality, ranging from dating to illegitimate sexual intercourse.

For example, in 4-128, the same word is used for the husband who is unfaithful. But for some reason, in that verse, it is not translated as disobedient husband.
In Nisa 34, it is explained what the man should do to the wife who is unfaithful and unchaste. First, warn him, then separate his bed, and if he continues, he is told to leave the house.

Beating a woman who betrays her man is not a solution anyway. When you take her out of the house, the woman is still the man's responsibility until the divorce. Even after divorce, the man protects and protects the woman.
In the 2nd verse of Surah Talak, two ways are shown in case of discord. Either to hold on with kindness, or to leave with beauty. If it is not possible to hold the woman with kindness, it is not said that you can beat her. On the contrary, it is said to leave with beauty. .
When they are near the end of their waiting period, either hold them with goodness and beauty, or separate them with beauty... (Surah Talak, 2) In the light of these examinations, the translation of the verse in question is as follows.....
.
Men are responsible for watching over women. Because God has given each of them different abilities and characteristics. As a matter of fact, the man is responsible for the livelihood of the house. Virtuous women submit to (God's law) and protect (their honor and chastity) that God has ordered them to protect, even if they are alone. Give advice to women whose honor and honor you are concerned about, separate your beds, and finally give up/separate. However, if they listen to you and give up, do not seek a way against them... (Surah Nisa, 34)

** Response to a possible objection: It is a frequently expressed objection that the verb "darabe" cannot be used metaphorically when used without a letter, so the command in verse 4:34 means "beat women" rather than "divorce women". When we examined the article ضرب -darabe- in Lisanu'l Arab, we saw the following example of the use of letter-i cersiz:

ضَرَبَ الدهْرُ بَيْنَنا أَي بَعَّدَ ما بَيْنَنا
Time has "hit" us. So he took us away. (Language,ضرب article)

As can be seen, the word "darabe" is used here without a letter-i cer, and Ibn Manzur states that the "darabe" here means "uzaklaştırma", that is, "uzaklaştırma", which is the meaning we give to verse 4:34.


Some people with deviant views have confused people’s minds by seeking evidence from the Quran for their own deviance and by deriving forced rulings. I certainly absolve those who do this as a mistake. If you pay attention, all commentators are men. In the interpretations made by the mentality that considers it rude for a pregnant woman to go out, women have been pushed to the background and a male-dominated system has been established with small additions that completely change the meaning. Allah, who informs us of every detail in the Quran, has warned Muslims against people with this mentality in verse 78 of the Ali Imran chapter.

There are some among them who bend their tongues towards the book so that you may think it (these seem to read) is from the book, but it is not from the book. They say, “This is from Allah,” but it is not from Allah. They tell lies about Allah, while they know it. (Surah Ali Imran, 78)

One of the verses that serve this system and cause confusion is the 4th verse of the Surah At-Talaq, where words that cause misunderstanding are added intentionally or unintentionally. First, let's look at the traditional translation of this verse;

“The waiting period of those among you who have stopped menstruating and those who have not yet menstruated is three months - if you are in doubt (know that). And the waiting period of pregnant women is (ends with) laying down their burdens. And whoever fears Allah, He will make things easy for him.” (Surah At-Talaq, 4)
For some reason, the word “yet”, which does not exist in the original, was added to the verse from scratch. This tiny addition completely changed the meaning. When it is said “not yet menstruating”, only one thing comes to mind. That is, children who have not yet menstruated because they have not reached puberty! However, the situation is different.

In order to say that she has not menstruated yet, the word “ellaaiii lemma yahidne” must be used in the verse. However, the expression “lem yahidne” is used in the verse.

Lem: It gives the meaning that it will never happen or has not happened.

Lemma: It gives the meaning that it has not happened yet, but it will happen.

Let's continue to examine the 4th verse of the At-Talaq Surah. In the verse, the waiting period for women who have stopped menstruating, that is, who have entered menopause, is stated as 3 months. What is the reason for waiting 3 months? It is to understand whether the woman is pregnant or not. Can a child who does not menstruate get pregnant? No. In that case, there is no need to wait 3 months. A woman who becomes pregnant does not menstruate. However, it takes time to understand that she is pregnant. The waiting period for women in this situation is also 3 months. Those who are definitely pregnant wait until birth.

The expression “vellai lem yahidne”, which is translated as girls who have not menstruated in translations, is the condition medically called “secondary amenorrhea”. In other words, it refers to women who do not menstruate because their menstrual cycle is disrupted (who do not menstruate for a period of 3 months or more for various reasons, even though they normally menstruate).

Also, the word “Nisa” in the verse is a word used for adult women in the Quran. If the person who does not menstruate were a child, then the words “Vildan, Veled, Benat…” should have been used. However, the word “Nisa” used to describe adult women is used in the verse. And the correct translation that should be is as follows.

“If you have doubts about the waiting period of those among your women who have stopped menstruating (by entering menopause), their waiting period is three months. The same is true for those who do not menstruate. The waiting period of pregnant women ends when they give birth to their children. And whoever fears Allah and guards himself against Him, Allah will make things easy for him.” (Talak, 4)

Also in the 3rd verse of Surah Ikhlas, “Lem yelid and Lem yuled”
It was not effective in giving birth/did not inject sperm and was not born
Is the “Lem” particle in the 3rd verse of Surah Ikhlas, which says “did not give birth and was not born”, in the sense of YET?
In other words, did Allah; (God forbid) become a father or a child / did anyone give birth after Hz. Muhammad?
Or is Allah a being that gives birth and is born in any case?

In conclusion: The age of marriage in the Quran is stated in the 6th verse of Surah An-Nisa. “Test the orphans until they reach the age of marriage; if you see in them maturity, then give them their property…” (Surah an-Nisa, 6) If you read the verse carefully, it says, “Test the orphans until they reach the age of marriage”; if you see in them maturity, then give them their property. In Islamic law, the dowry is the money or property that a man gives to a woman when they get married. The dowry is given directly to the woman, not to her family. According to the verse above, the age at which the property is delivered to its owner is the age at which that person can control his property. Therefore, the woman who receives the dowry must be at an age at which she can control this property or money. In addition, the word “rüşd” is used for both men and women in the verse. This means “the ability to find the right path”. A small child may even have difficulty finding his way home. In short, the marriage age in the Quran is completely compatible with the marriage age in the civil law. Claiming otherwise is perversion. No one should seek evidence from the Quran for their own perversion!

Bruv I ain’t reading all dat.


Your Tasfirs and shieks make it clear this verse is saying if your Kafir you have 3 choices, convert, pay Jizya or die

That’s it. That’s your religion, if you don’t like it, leave the cult Of PIssLamb. Please and thank you

Listen to your satanic sheiks you fucking faggot

 

[Htnn]

Bruv I ain’t reading all dat.


Your Tasfirs and shieks make it clear this verse is saying if your Kafir you have 3 choices, convert, pay Jizya or die

That’s it. That’s your religion, if you don’t like it, leave the cult Of PIssLamb. Please and thank you

Ofc You Don't Have To Read All That. But At Least Know That You're Debunked. Have A Nice Day

 

[PrinceLuenLeoncur]

Ofc You Don't Have To Read All That. But At Least Know That You're Debunked. Have A Nice Day

You debunked nothing your sheiks and Tasfirs agree with me


Good day faggot Muslim. Your Hadiths everything’s on my side nothings on yours I read a few of what you said and like I assumed it’s all bullshit

 

[Htnn]

You debunked nothing your sheiks and Tasfirs agree with me


Good day faggot Muslim. Your Hadiths everything’s on my side nothings on yours I read a few of what you said and like I assumed it’s all bullshit

The Only Source İn İslam İs Quran İtself. You Keep up Worshipping to sheiks tasfirs and hadiths. You Did Not Even Deserve to See All That Paragraph But Anyway. Keep Reading A Few Words From İt like that Sometimes.

 

[Htnn]

Listen to your satanic sheiks you fucking faggot

I Hope This Joke