Isles Stacy Examples

byvw

byvw

wild bnuuy
Joined
Jul 22, 2024
Posts
2,157
Reputation
2,678
4 Americans, 4 British, 2 Australians.
Post if you have any examples.

Yes dude they are not High Tier Beckies.
Cope harder.
 

Attachments

  • 4575177_1734356583896.mp4
    6.8 MB
  • 4575156_1734352300851.mp4
    2 MB
  • 4575157_1734348431973.mp4
    7.4 MB
  • 4575158_1734347419633.mp4
    1.2 MB
  • 4575159_1734347073194.mp4
    858.2 KB
  • 4575160_1734346386022.mp4
    1.5 MB
  • 4575161_1734344725875.mp4
    8.6 MB
  • 4575162_1734344475882.mp4
    2.5 MB
  • 4575166_1734343602675.mp4
    8 MB
  • 4575187_1734353881855.mp4
    6.3 MB
  • Love it
  • JFL
  • Hmm...
Reactions: heightmaxxing, Bars, sportsmogger and 3 others
Only 4th and 7th fog
@Debetro
 
  • +1
Reactions: Debetro, not__cel and War_In_Chiraq
Disgusting white women
 
Bug eyes disqualify someone from being a stacy
 
  • +1
Reactions: first snow
MTB extravaganza
 
  • +1
Reactions: abcd
Nope. Deep set eyes are damn rare among males. Even more rare among females. You dont know what you are talking about.
Yes they are rare, what I said is a hyperbole. Nonetheless the image I posted showcases clear bug eyes and nearly all of them have shallow set eyes even if they're not death tier. It's simply not aesthetic.
 
Nonetheless the image I posted showcases clear bug eyes and nearly all of them have shallow set eyes even if they're not death tier. It's simply not aesthetic.

NoReedemingFeature

Autist​

Their eyes are completely normal. You are gigacoping and you know it. Post deep set female eyes as example.
 

NoReedemingFeature

Autist​

Their eyes are completely normal. You are gigacoping and you know it. Post deep set female eyes as example.
I'm not going to say these are deep set but relatively deeper set than all the other examples, and if you're keen I can dig up some of my own
 
Whats Isles? That Guernsey shithole?
 
Except my examples. It is mainly due to eye hooding not because of eye set. You need to find your own examples.
Ok, is this sufficient?
1734384273261

I'm not going to bother finding a non hooded example since a deep eye set point amplified existent hooding anyways
 
Ok, is this sufficient?
View attachment 3361143
I'm not going to bother finding a non hooded example since a deep eye set point amplified existent hooding anyways
This is normal set. JFL. Side profile shots are better to understand. Her side.
IMG 0243

JFL at posting supermodels as example. Rotter basement dweller autist trait.

Deep set eyes are extremely rare in women and are best characterized by prominent supraorbitals.(compared to eyeballs)
 
  • Love it
Reactions: first snow
She looks Turanid
Hooded (but not Mongoloid) eye shape is more common among Isles people and descendants compared to others.
 
and are best characterized by prominent supraorbitals.(compared to eyeballs)
Nope, eyes can still be shallow set in spite of being enveloped by bone. It's how deep itself the eyeball sits in the socket, not about its mass
 
It's how deep itself the eyeball sits in the socket
Nope. The eye socket is determined by the bone structure surrounding it, and the deep setting nature of an eye is most easily understood by its anterior-superior bone border.

The supraorbital structure generally gives a clue about how deep the eye is set. Besides, this is not significantly different in people. There may be very minimal differences. The eye structure you are talking about is related to the genetic makeup of the tissues surrounding the eye rather than the placement of the eye. In other words, the structure of the eyelids and the soft tissues located a little more peripherally.

Anyway, deep set eyes are very rare, and the model you shared does not have deep set eyes.
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: NoReedemingFeature
Nope. The eye socket is determined by the bone structure surrounding it, and the deep setting nature of an eye is most easily understood by its anterior-superior bone border.

The supraorbital structure generally gives a clue about how deep the eye is set. Besides, this is not significantly different in people. There may be very minimal differences. The eye structure you are talking about is related to the genetic makeup of the tissues surrounding the eye rather than the placement of the eye. In other words, the structure of the eyelids and the soft tissues located a little more peripherally.

Anyway, deep set eyes are very rare, and the model you shared does not have deep set eyes.
This just isn't relevant to deep set eyes I was considering and I wasn't trying to showcase anyways, but literally how shallow or deep the back of the eye socket is allowing the eyeball to sit within. Which is what I was talking about.
Maybe seeing the contrary will help you understand.
R1oWW8DvL0QQO3XELDIWYnehI0g
He has a good amount of mass in the supraorbital yet his eyes are still shallow set. Same how a orbital decompression doesn't create new bone but removes tissue and shaves down the back of the eye socket.

And women can still have much supraorbital mass since it's genetics over hormonal profile anyways
179839316 1280x7201
 
good amount of mass
Mass =/= Shape, Shape is what matters.

Even this discussion is extremely stupid because eye area structure is related to the genetic makeup of bones and soft tissues rather than the placement of the eye, which is directly related to the skull and facial tissues.
 

Similar threads

narcomogs
Replies
9
Views
274
narcomogs
narcomogs
Funnyunenjoyer1
Replies
5
Views
177
autistic_tendencies
autistic_tendencies
femboychad
Replies
5
Views
156
autistic_tendencies
autistic_tendencies

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top