Israel's f35 shelter after iran's attack

[vaseqmoherad]

This means that iran can hit eveywhere in israel with pinpoint accuracy! no mater how protected it is!

 

[devonhendryx999]

The iron dome is rustingggg

 

[Deleted member 95912]

i just want some iron dome

 

[vaseqmoherad]

The iron dome is rustingggg

iron dome is for primitive low range projectiles. their defense against ballistic missiles is arrow,david sling and us anti ballistic air defense in the region. which all failed brutally.

 

[vaseqmoherad]

brutal

 

[thenewhebbe]

In a war israel would nuke iran

 

[vaseqmoherad]

then they would get hit by nuclear warheads that says made in pakistan and delivery missile made in iran.

 

[thenewhebbe]

then they would get hit by nuclear warheads that says made in pakistan and delivery missile made in iran.

Why would Pakistan get involved they arent that close . Pakistan don't wanna get nuked

 

[vaseqmoherad]

Why would Pakistan get involved they arent that close . Pakistan don't wanna get nuked

even if that doesnt happen iran can hit their nuclear facilities and make that place uninhabitable.

 

[SecularIslamist]

In a war israel would nuke iran

Who said Iran don't have nukes. Are you aware of nuclear deterrence. States have nuclear weapons not because they are ever going to use them, but because no one will ever invade them.

 

[thenewhebbe]

Who said Iran don't have nukes. Are you aware of nuclear deterrence. States have nuclear weapons not because they are ever going to use them, but because no one will ever invade them.

I mean israel love to assinate and bomb nucler facilitys. And you have to use them if someone attacks

 

[vaseqmoherad]

Who said Iran don't have nukes. Are you aware of nuclear deterrence. States have nuclear weapons not because they are ever going to use them, but because no one will ever invade them.

iran is nuclear threshold like south korea and japan. keep in mind that bashar (and likely iran too) also has chemical weapons. or they could hit dimona nuclear facility.

 

[thenewhebbe]

even if that doesnt happen iran can hit their nuclear facilities and make that place uninhabitable.

Israel would do well and iran would be mad max

 

[thenewhebbe]

iran is nuclear threshold like south korea and japan. keep in mind that bashar (and likely iran too) also has chemical weapons. or they could hit dimona nuclear facility.

Unless they have nukes now it dosent matter

 

[vaseqmoherad]

Israel would do well and iran would be mad max

coping hard tbh. israel has lost. idfcels are currently dying like flies in north. and if they react strongly to iran they would have no infrastucture left!

 

[thenewhebbe]

coping hard tbh. israel has lost. idfcels are currently dying like flies in north. and if they react strongly to iran they would have no infrastucture left!

If theh reacr strongly all of its enemy would flee

 

[God-himself]

In a war israel would nuke iran

I doubt they have that much military power...nukes are for superpowers...but maybe I'm wrong

 

[SecularIslamist]

I mean israel love to assinate and bomb nucler facilitys. And you have to use them if someone attacks

Nuclear weapons are weapons of last resort and taboo to use. They don't even acknowledge they have it. What makes you think they would use it? Deterrence theory is exactly that. The threat of it is enough. Iran isn't gonna invade Israel with boots on the ground and Israel is not gonna invade Iran with boots on the ground. It makes zero sense for either. They will continue their proxy wars.

Many IR scholars are in favour of Iran getting a nuke (Kenneth Waltz) precisely because it would restore balance of power.

Anyway who said they haven't got one already? Like I said they always maintain a policy of ambiguity. Many states do this with chemical weapons as well (Assad with chemical weapons).

 

[Hypersonic]

Nah , Iran failed again miserably, they failed to damage mossad headquarters as the missiles felt like 1.5 miles away from the headquarters, f35 were there in the hangers they were all airborne, Iran just striked no man's land and KIA few Palestinians, 5 Iranians died simply when they launched the missiles.

 

[thenewhebbe]

Nuclear weapons are weapons of last resort and taboo to use. They don't even acknowledge they have it. What makes you think they would use it? Deterrence theory is exactly that. The threat of it is enough. Iran isn't gonna invade Israel with boots on the ground and Israel is not gonna invade Iran with boots on the ground. It makes zero sense for either. They will continue their proxy wars.

Many IR scholars are in favour of Iran getting a nuke (Kenneth Waltz) precisely because it would restore balance of power.

Anyway who said they haven't got one already? Like I said they always maintain a policy of ambiguity. Many states do this with chemical weapons as well (Assad with chemical weapons).

In a war situation they would use it . But yeah I do agree that iran wont invade or that israel will invade its a what if

I can see the argument tjat iran might need to be nuked not for his reason.

Israel loving killing bombing iran facility

 

[vaseqmoherad]

Nuclear weapons are weapons of last resort and taboo to use. They don't even acknowledge they have it. What makes you think they would use it? Deterrence theory is exactly that. The threat of it is enough. Iran isn't gonna invade Israel with boots on the ground and Israel is not gonna invade Iran with boots on the ground. It makes zero sense for either. They will continue their proxy wars.

Many IR scholars are in favour of Iran getting a nuke (Kenneth Waltz) precisely because it would restore balance of power.

Anyway who said they haven't got one already? Like I said they always maintain a policy of ambiguity. Many states do this with chemical weapons as well (Assad with chemical weapons).

outside nukes and chemical weapons, there is ammonia reserves in haifa, their explosion would bigger than hiroshima and nagasaki bombs.

the fact that iran strikes israel with confidence should tell you everything tbh.

 

[vaseqmoherad]

Nah , Iran failed again miserably, they failed to damage mossad headquarters as the missiles felt like 1.5 miles away from the headquarters, f35 were there in the hangers they were all airborne, Iran just striked no man's land and KIA few Palestinians, 5 Iranians died simply when they launched the missiles.

source:goy news.

israel literally got crushed in that night.

more than 90% of missiles hitting is failure for israel and us air defense. also israel hasnt published any destruction.

next time it will be civilian infrastructure or even nuclear facilities!

 

[thenewhebbe]

source:goy news.

israel literally got crushed in that night.

more than 90% of missiles hitting is failure for israel and us air defense. also israel hasnt published any destruction.

next time it will be civilian infrastructure or even nuclear facilities!

The 90 % is from iran

And iran won't target those structure if yhey do tehran dosent exist anymore

 

[SecularIslamist]

In a war situation they would use it . But yeah I do agree that iran wont invade or that israel will invade its a what if

I can see the argument tjat iran might need to be nuked not for his reason.

Israel loving killing bombing iran facility

Israel can carry on playing this game of guacamole.

If nukes are used Israel, then there is a legal right for mutually assured destruction (MAD) the other way - presuming Iran have nukes as well. I think the US and Soviets agreed this as well - if one strikes with nukes, the other is entitled to strike back.

Either way, even without a nuke if it happened Iran will strike back and will drop bombs over Israel just like Israel have done to Gaza - where they've dropped 7 times more explosives than Hiroshima. It only makes sense.

 

[thenewhebbe]

Israel can carry on playing this game of guacamole.

If nukes are used Israel, then there is a legal right for mutually assured destruction (MAD) the other way - presuming Iran have nukes as well. I think the US and Soviets agreed this as well - if one strikes with nukes, the other is entitled to strike back.

Either way, even without a nuke if it happened Iran will strike back and will drop bombs over Israel just like Israel have done to Gaza - where they've dropped 7 times more explosives than Hiroshima. It only makes sense.

We don't know if iran have them. If iran don't have nukes israel would have turn the country to mad max it wouldn't exist and tens of millions would flee . I don't think people would fight for a country that dosent exist.

To be clear the hiroshima argument helps my view and israel view and its shows they are targeting enemny combattan. The lowest death toll in hiroshima is 100 k and 7 times a 100 is 700 k and only 40 to 50 k hsve died

 

[Hypersonic]

source:goy news.

israel literally got crushed in that night.

more than 90% of missiles hitting is failure for israel and us air defense. also israel hasnt published any destruction.

next time it will be civilian infrastructure or even nuclear facilities!

AD only intercepts missiles that may hit critical infrastructure or civilians . It let goes the one which do not

 

[vaseqmoherad]

AD only intercepts missiles that may hit critical infrastructure or civilians . It let goes the one which do not

fucking retard tbh.