dogeatsgrass
Bronze
- Joined
- Mar 15, 2020
- Posts
- 488
- Reputation
- 993
So, I have noticed that for looksmaxxing most people here refer to the PSL ratings and they are highly highly based on male models than anything else. Is it true that attractiveness for males is not always PSL rating dependent?
For example, Zac Efron, Ted Bundy, Keanu Reeves, etc etc, and especially john krasinski won't really qualify of anything but maybe 6 max. Maybe there is more to looks than just PSL stuff looking like Chad etc. Maybe the expressions, or personality of the face makes men look attractive?
He looks like Gumby and honestly if he was a member here and seeking advise, he might get 4 or 5 rating.
Most of these guys might get high numbers, but still they won't be considered highly attractive based on side profile.
Yes he has most decent face structure but look at downward sloping Jaw that's considered a flaw in PSL.
This guy has amazing features but side profile isn't perfect..
For example, Zac Efron, Ted Bundy, Keanu Reeves, etc etc, and especially john krasinski won't really qualify of anything but maybe 6 max. Maybe there is more to looks than just PSL stuff looking like Chad etc. Maybe the expressions, or personality of the face makes men look attractive?
He looks like Gumby and honestly if he was a member here and seeking advise, he might get 4 or 5 rating.
Most of these guys might get high numbers, but still they won't be considered highly attractive based on side profile.
Yes he has most decent face structure but look at downward sloping Jaw that's considered a flaw in PSL.
This guy has amazing features but side profile isn't perfect..