sub6manletnozygos
Kraken
- Joined
- Nov 19, 2019
- Posts
- 4,501
- Reputation
- 6,775
That is the logic of the average anti European.
This is delusional, self-righteous and hypocritical sentiment, devoid of substance and full of malice.
Have you forgotten about the barbary slave trade?
Have you forgotten about southern spain being colonized by various islamic caliphates from the 700s to 1490s until they were kicked out by native Spanish, who then commenced their colonization of other states given the momentum of their developed military industrial complex?
Why have you forgotten about the armenian genocide?
Why have you forgotten about the greek genocide?
Why have you forgotten about the ottoman empire conquering the balkans and raping and murdering their way all way to Vienna Austria.
Ask yourself why albania and many other balkan countries speak arabic...
Why does do you forgot that Mongolian rampaged through half of Europe?
It also begs the question, which countries/regions abolished slavery first and which countries/regions paid reparations first (European).
While you ask yourself this, also ask which countries still currently practices slavery of africans and which countries/demographics currently practice indentured servitude to build their large complexes.
Using this, I will now explain the vortex of retrospectively justified malice.
The Arabs never assimilated into Southern Spain with Islam's occupation of Spain for 700+ years, so why should anyone else assimilate into Spain, and why should the Spanish peaceful assimilate anywhere else including Latin America?
The Spanish didn't assimilate into native American culture so why respect contemporaneous Spanish culture nowadays? Germany colonized Africa, so why should Turks assimilate into Germany, espouses the Turk with gleeful gall and guile as he lives in Germany on unemployment benefits, and espouses fundamentalism in conflict with his drinking habits. Wait a minute.
The Ottoman empire never assimilated into Eastern Europe as it invaded and occupied vast land masses from the Baltics all the way up to the border of Vienna, so why should any Eastern European assimilate into Northern Europe, as Albanians reportedly cause civic disunity in different Western European countries according to mainstream media, and why should any Afghani refugee peacefully assimilate into contemporary Turkey given the great conquests Ottoman conquests?
Neither the British, nor the Muslims assimilated when they invaded India, so why should India peacefully assimilate anywhere else?
India hardly assimilated into Fiji when it became 4-50% Indian in the 1980s, until there was a military coupe which caused coerced repatriation, so why should any Fijians assimilate anywhere else?
The African Barbary pirates didn't assimilate into the British Isles, so why should England assimilate into Africa (either the north or south). The British didn't assimilate into South Africa, so why should contemporary African refugees assimilate into Western Europe?
That is the circular logic of all lying trickers (most demographics on earth as guilty as everyone is human and capable of denialism and gaslighting the other).
This isn't meant to be inflammatory. My point is just to argue that cultural and demographic friction is in perpetual flux (where guilt is held by most, if not all, demographics, but denied by many, like yourself - a lying trickster, who coincidentally remains ignorant of historical truths).
This is delusional, self-righteous and hypocritical sentiment, devoid of substance and full of malice.
Have you forgotten about the barbary slave trade?
Have you forgotten about southern spain being colonized by various islamic caliphates from the 700s to 1490s until they were kicked out by native Spanish, who then commenced their colonization of other states given the momentum of their developed military industrial complex?
Why have you forgotten about the armenian genocide?
Why have you forgotten about the greek genocide?
Why have you forgotten about the ottoman empire conquering the balkans and raping and murdering their way all way to Vienna Austria.
Ask yourself why albania and many other balkan countries speak arabic...
Why does do you forgot that Mongolian rampaged through half of Europe?
It also begs the question, which countries/regions abolished slavery first and which countries/regions paid reparations first (European).
While you ask yourself this, also ask which countries still currently practices slavery of africans and which countries/demographics currently practice indentured servitude to build their large complexes.
Using this, I will now explain the vortex of retrospectively justified malice.
The Arabs never assimilated into Southern Spain with Islam's occupation of Spain for 700+ years, so why should anyone else assimilate into Spain, and why should the Spanish peaceful assimilate anywhere else including Latin America?
The Spanish didn't assimilate into native American culture so why respect contemporaneous Spanish culture nowadays? Germany colonized Africa, so why should Turks assimilate into Germany, espouses the Turk with gleeful gall and guile as he lives in Germany on unemployment benefits, and espouses fundamentalism in conflict with his drinking habits. Wait a minute.
The Ottoman empire never assimilated into Eastern Europe as it invaded and occupied vast land masses from the Baltics all the way up to the border of Vienna, so why should any Eastern European assimilate into Northern Europe, as Albanians reportedly cause civic disunity in different Western European countries according to mainstream media, and why should any Afghani refugee peacefully assimilate into contemporary Turkey given the great conquests Ottoman conquests?
Neither the British, nor the Muslims assimilated when they invaded India, so why should India peacefully assimilate anywhere else?
India hardly assimilated into Fiji when it became 4-50% Indian in the 1980s, until there was a military coupe which caused coerced repatriation, so why should any Fijians assimilate anywhere else?
The African Barbary pirates didn't assimilate into the British Isles, so why should England assimilate into Africa (either the north or south). The British didn't assimilate into South Africa, so why should contemporary African refugees assimilate into Western Europe?
That is the circular logic of all lying trickers (most demographics on earth as guilty as everyone is human and capable of denialism and gaslighting the other).
This isn't meant to be inflammatory. My point is just to argue that cultural and demographic friction is in perpetual flux (where guilt is held by most, if not all, demographics, but denied by many, like yourself - a lying trickster, who coincidentally remains ignorant of historical truths).
Last edited:
bump, i hate myself. i wish i was better looking. maybe i would spend less time writing silly essays. 
