“JBW” - the ultimate lie

BHB

BHB

Silver
Joined
May 22, 2025
Posts
538
Reputation
1,006
We have all heard it. Whenever an ethnic asks for looksmaxxing advice, or even mentions their struggles, there is always someone saying “JBW”, but how true is this?


When “JBW” copers think of a white man and an ethnic man, this is what they imagine:


A 6’2 white CL with insanely high appeal.
IMG 6354


And…

A 5’6 ugly Indian.
IMG 6355



People (brainrotted .org users), due to biases, think so black and white that they can not comprehend that the skin tone is not what is making these men look so much better or worse. The ethnic looksmaxxers see these men and come to the conclusion that their skin color has made them undesirable, and the white looksmaxxers come to the copefueled conclusion that no matter how autistic and ugly they are, they will always be better than ethnics.


But let’s take a step back and take a look at an attractive ethnic, and an ugly white male.


6’5 black man.
IMG 6356


And…

A 5’7 ugly white man.
IMG 6357


In fact, here’s an attractive Indian to blow your minds :feelshah:
IMG 6358



As shown here, looks matter much more than ethnicity. Can ethnicity play a role in how one looks? For sure. Are eurocentric features still the idea looks? Yeah, for the most part. But to say that, or act as if, ethnicity is the end all be all, or the most important factor, when it comes to being good looking, is so genuinely retarded of a take. A broke Indian living in the slums of Mumbai can be more attractive than a rich Swede living in a mansion. No sane human being will value an ugly white man over an attractive ethnic in any way.


Overall, “JBW” is pure copium, and only retarded people say it.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
  • Ugh..
Reactions: trashbinxoxo, ProBono, Swarthy Knight and 4 others
Thanks for the looksmaxxing advice
 
  • +1
  • JFL
  • So Sad
Reactions: aids, BHB, browncurrycel and 1 other person
Overall, “JBW” is pure copium, and only retarded people say it.
@eon you should show this highly educated individual some dating stats
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: high_ltn, eon, Swarthy Knight and 4 others
IMG 7561
 
  • +1
Reactions: fwhr glazer, pslgod69, Orka and 1 other person
dnr
 
  • +1
Reactions: Piratecel, Bryce and Orka
JBW doesn't mean that whites are always preferred, just that with everything else being equal, women of all races are more likely to go for the white guy.

Beauty standards worldwide benefit white people the most. European eye shapes, nose shapes, hair colors and skin colors are all seen as the hallmarks of beauty. Non-white people who look good typically have more Euro features; the more exaggerated ethnic features are, the less likely the Ethnic man will look good.
 
  • +1
Reactions: zharupodrugu and truebonesmasher210
We have all heard it. Whenever an ethnic asks for looksmaxxing advice, or even mentions their struggles, there is always someone saying “JBW”, but how true is this?


When “JBW” copers think of a white man and an ethnic man, this is what they imagine:


A 6’2 white CL with insanely high appeal.
View attachment 4120041

And…

A 5’6 ugly Indian.
View attachment 4120047


People (brainrotted .org users), due to biases, think so black and white that they can not comprehend that the skin tone is not what is making these men look so much better or worse. The ethnic looksmaxxers see these men and come to the conclusion that their skin color has made them undesirable, and the white looksmaxxers come to the copefueled conclusion that no matter how autistic and ugly they are, they will always be better than ethnics.


But let’s take a step back and take a look at an attractive ethnic, and an ugly white male.


6’5 black man.
View attachment 4120051

And…

A 5’7 ugly white man.
View attachment 4120056

In fact, here’s an attractive Indian to blow your minds :feelshah:
View attachment 4120061


As shown here, looks matter much more than ethnicity. Can ethnicity play a role in how one looks? For sure. Are eurocentric features still the idea looks? Yeah, for the most part. But to say that, or act as if, ethnicity is the end all be all, or the most important factor, when it comes to being good looking, is so genuinely retarded of a take. A broke Indian living in the slums of Mumbai can be more attractive than a rich Swede living in a mansion. No sane human being will value an ugly white man over an attractive ethnic in any way.


Overall, “JBW” is pure copium, and only retarded people say it.
An ugly Indian, is beyond ugly

An ugly white man, is leagues beyond his Indian counterpart

JBW is true
 
  • +1
Reactions: zharupodrugu, truebonesmasher210, Bryce and 1 other person
JBW doesn't mean that whites are always preferred, just that with everything else being equal, women of all races are more likely to go for the white guy.

Beauty standards worldwide benefit white people the most. European eye shapes, nose shapes, hair colors and skin colors are all seen as the hallmarks of beauty. Non-white people who look good typically have more Euro features; the more exaggerated ethnic features are, the less likely the Ethnic man will look good.
Fair point. I realized this while looking online for attractive ethnics but was too far in so i have to stick to it now.
 
  • +1
Reactions: trashbinxoxo
An ugly Indian, is beyond ugly

An ugly white man, is leagues beyond his Indian counterpart

JBW is true
I disagree. No real limit with ugliness.
 
  • +1
Reactions: trashbinxoxo
jbw is basic blackpill since whites look better than any other ethnicity on average, noone says ethnics cant be gl but everyone knows whites are the best looking and most likely to pump out the highest concentration of htns and chads so to speak and its why whites tend to be at the top of the ladder in terms of smv and psl

I do agree there are people who exaggerate it tho
 
  • +1
Reactions: BHB
I disagree. No real limit with ugliness.
5th percentile white mogs a 5th percentile Indian, do you disagree?

Of course you don't. It's water

But it seems to be lava to you.

Are you ethnic by chance?
 
  • +1
Reactions: FiendFiend and Bryce
5th percentile white mogs a 5th percentile Indian, do you disagree?

Of course you don't. It's water

But it seems to be lava to you.

Are you ethnic by chance?
fair point ngl. I misinterpreted JBW it seems.

Im white.
 
  • +1
Reactions: trashbinxoxo
5th percentile white mogs a 5th percentile Indian, do you disagree?

Of course you don't. It's water

But it seems to be lava to you.

Are you ethnic by chance?

this thread is a perfect example of what im talking about, the guy in OP has all the wrong features and yet doesnt look disgusting like yeh hes subhuman, but not to the point of repulsion. Give any other ethnic the exact same features and they would be absolutely hideous to look at
 

this thread is a perfect example of what im talking about, the guy in OP has all the wrong features and yet doesnt look disgusting like yeh hes subhuman, but not to the point of repulsion. Give any other ethnic the exact same features and they would be absolutely hideous to look at
Very good point. Ugly, but doesn’t feel bad to look at. Physiognomy is fine.
 
  • +1
Reactions: trashbinxoxo and icebl00d._.03
You have not posted a single white
@Nex Gen
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 217459
grass is green nigga
 
No way! People that are better looking of subjectively inferior races will do better than people of a subjectively superior race that are ugly? Incredible observation of nuance bro!
Retard.
 
We have all heard it. Whenever an ethnic asks for looksmaxxing advice, or even mentions their struggles, there is always someone saying “JBW”, but how true is this?


When “JBW” copers think of a white man and an ethnic man, this is what they imagine:


A 6’2 white CL with insanely high appeal.
View attachment 4120041

And…

A 5’6 ugly Indian.
View attachment 4120047


People (brainrotted .org users), due to biases, think so black and white that they can not comprehend that the skin tone is not what is making these men look so much better or worse. The ethnic looksmaxxers see these men and come to the conclusion that their skin color has made them undesirable, and the white looksmaxxers come to the copefueled conclusion that no matter how autistic and ugly they are, they will always be better than ethnics.


But let’s take a step back and take a look at an attractive ethnic, and an ugly white male.


6’5 black man.
View attachment 4120051

And…

A 5’7 ugly white man.
View attachment 4120056

In fact, here’s an attractive Indian to blow your minds :feelshah:
View attachment 4120061


As shown here, looks matter much more than ethnicity. Can ethnicity play a role in how one looks? For sure. Are eurocentric features still the idea looks? Yeah, for the most part. But to say that, or act as if, ethnicity is the end all be all, or the most important factor, when it comes to being good looking, is so genuinely retarded of a take. A broke Indian living in the slums of Mumbai can be more attractive than a rich Swede living in a mansion. No sane human being will value an ugly white man over an attractive ethnic in any way.


Overall, “JBW” is pure copium, and only retarded people say it.
1758096106549


saw this and just made me cage.


JBW is based on the fact a white mtn smv mogs any other race mtn to the shitter. Nice cope though retard
 
  • +1
Reactions: icebl00d._.03
5th percentile white mogs a 5th percentile Indian, do you disagree?

Of course you don't. It's water

But it seems to be lava to you.

Are you ethnic by chance?
its like explaining water to an african. Hes fucking retarded. Muh heres ugly white guy and good looking curry! LOOK U THINK THE CURRY WOULD PULL LESS?

thats not the point, thats such exaggeration. a white ltn, mtn, mogs every other ethnic ltn or mtn in terms of smv.
 
  • +1
Reactions: icebl00d._.03
its like explaining water to an african. Hes fucking retarded. Muh heres ugly white guy and good looking curry! LOOK U THINK THE CURRY WOULD PULL LESS?

thats not the point, thats such exaggeration. a white ltn, mtn, mogs every other ethnic ltn or mtn in terms of smv.
Yo my bad bro :feelswah:
 
  • +1
Reactions: trashbinxoxo
No way! People that are better looking of subjectively inferior races will do better than people of a subjectively superior race that are ugly? Incredible observation of nuance bro!
Retard.
Goddamn my bad
 
  • So Sad
  • +1
Reactions: trashbinxoxo and aids
JFL at thinking this has any appeal, the 5'7 white dude smv mogs him
1758096655533
 
We have all heard it. Whenever an ethnic asks for looksmaxxing advice, or even mentions their struggles, there is always someone saying “JBW”, but how true is this?


When “JBW” copers think of a white man and an ethnic man, this is what they imagine:


A 6’2 white CL with insanely high appeal.
View attachment 4120041

And…

A 5’6 ugly Indian.
View attachment 4120047


People (brainrotted .org users), due to biases, think so black and white that they can not comprehend that the skin tone is not what is making these men look so much better or worse. The ethnic looksmaxxers see these men and come to the conclusion that their skin color has made them undesirable, and the white looksmaxxers come to the copefueled conclusion that no matter how autistic and ugly they are, they will always be better than ethnics.


But let’s take a step back and take a look at an attractive ethnic, and an ugly white male.


6’5 black man.
View attachment 4120051

And…

A 5’7 ugly white man.
View attachment 4120056

In fact, here’s an attractive Indian to blow your minds :feelshah:
View attachment 4120061


As shown here, looks matter much more than ethnicity. Can ethnicity play a role in how one looks? For sure. Are eurocentric features still the idea looks? Yeah, for the most part. But to say that, or act as if, ethnicity is the end all be all, or the most important factor, when it comes to being good looking, is so genuinely retarded of a take. A broke Indian living in the slums of Mumbai can be more attractive than a rich Swede living in a mansion. No sane human being will value an ugly white man over an attractive ethnic in any way.


Overall, “JBW” is pure copium, and only retarded people say it.
Worst argument I’ve ever seen and I’m not even white
 
  • +1
Reactions: icebl00d._.03 and aids
You copers still dont get it right. JBW is basically,

White Chad-CL >> Ethnic Chad-CL
White HTN >> Ethnic HTN
White MTN >> Ethnic MTN
White LTN >>Ethnic LTN

No one claims that white LTN mogs ethnic CL. But for example if you are an ethnic HTN "ethnic tax" applies and you have same value of white "MTN"

Percentage of attractive people and their attractiveness scale are higher in whites.
 
  • +1
Reactions: icebl00d._.03 and ProBono
this genuinely pissed me off you made the most water post OAT and then argued with a strawman saying whites are unconditionally more attractive than ethnics

and to think the greycel above me actually makes the most logical response bruh
 
You copers still dont get it right. JBW is basically,

White Chad-CL >> Ethnic Chad-CL
White HTN >> Ethnic HTN
White MTN >> Ethnic MTN
White LTN >>Ethnic LTN

No one claims that white LTN mogs ethnic CL. But for example if you are an ethnic HTN "ethnic tax" applies and you have same value of white "MTN"

Percentage of attractive people and their attractiveness scale are higher in whites.
My bad bro.
 
this genuinely pissed me off you made the most water post OAT and then argued with a strawman saying whites are unconditionally more attractive than ethnics

and to think the greycel above me actually makes the most logical response bruh
Yeah my bad dude I misinterpreted JBW. If i could delete post i would lol.
 
  • +1
Reactions: trashbinxoxo and icebl00d._.03

Attachments

  • IMG_4044.jpeg
    IMG_4044.jpeg
    130.8 KB · Views: 0
  • +1
Reactions: Bryce
We have all heard it. Whenever an ethnic asks for looksmaxxing advice, or even mentions their struggles, there is always someone saying “JBW”, but how true is this?


When “JBW” copers think of a white man and an ethnic man, this is what they imagine:


A 6’2 white CL with insanely high appeal.
View attachment 4120041

And…

A 5’6 ugly Indian.
View attachment 4120047


People (brainrotted .org users), due to biases, think so black and white that they can not comprehend that the skin tone is not what is making these men look so much better or worse. The ethnic looksmaxxers see these men and come to the conclusion that their skin color has made them undesirable, and the white looksmaxxers come to the copefueled conclusion that no matter how autistic and ugly they are, they will always be better than ethnics.


But let’s take a step back and take a look at an attractive ethnic, and an ugly white male.


6’5 black man.
View attachment 4120051

And…

A 5’7 ugly white man.
View attachment 4120056

In fact, here’s an attractive Indian to blow your minds :feelshah:
View attachment 4120061


As shown here, looks matter much more than ethnicity. Can ethnicity play a role in how one looks? For sure. Are eurocentric features still the idea looks? Yeah, for the most part. But to say that, or act as if, ethnicity is the end all be all, or the most important factor, when it comes to being good looking, is so genuinely retarded of a take. A broke Indian living in the slums of Mumbai can be more attractive than a rich Swede living in a mansion. No sane human being will value an ugly white man over an attractive ethnic in any way.


Overall, “JBW” is pure copium, and only retarded people say it.
biggest dnr today whites are superior
 
We have all heard it. Whenever an ethnic asks for looksmaxxing advice, or even mentions their struggles, there is always someone saying “JBW”, but how true is this?


When “JBW” copers think of a white man and an ethnic man, this is what they imagine:


A 6’2 white CL with insanely high appeal.
View attachment 4120041

And…

A 5’6 ugly Indian.
View attachment 4120047


People (brainrotted .org users), due to biases, think so black and white that they can not comprehend that the skin tone is not what is making these men look so much better or worse. The ethnic looksmaxxers see these men and come to the conclusion that their skin color has made them undesirable, and the white looksmaxxers come to the copefueled conclusion that no matter how autistic and ugly they are, they will always be better than ethnics.


But let’s take a step back and take a look at an attractive ethnic, and an ugly white male.


6’5 black man.
View attachment 4120051

And…

A 5’7 ugly white man.
View attachment 4120056

In fact, here’s an attractive Indian to blow your minds :feelshah:
View attachment 4120061


As shown here, looks matter much more than ethnicity. Can ethnicity play a role in how one looks? For sure. Are eurocentric features still the idea looks? Yeah, for the most part. But to say that, or act as if, ethnicity is the end all be all, or the most important factor, when it comes to being good looking, is so genuinely retarded of a take. A broke Indian living in the slums of Mumbai can be more attractive than a rich Swede living in a mansion. No sane human being will value an ugly white man over an attractive ethnic in any way.


Overall, “JBW” is pure copium, and only retarded people say it.
Shit thread. The average White looks more like the 6'2 cl from the first pic than the 5'6 indian in the second pic. Whites are just on average better looking than ethnics. A White sub5 might have blue eyes or be 5'10 (very tall in the third world) and get women through geomaxxing. An Indian sub5 is almost guaranteed to be very short and to have plain, mundane features that aren't exotic (anymore). I'm talking about the brown skin, jet black hair, T50 eyes, etc., which you can find in 6 billion people out of 8 billion on earth
 
Ur not fucking real.
 
Why always go to such extremes?


White MTN mog to death indian MTN, its not even close
 

Similar threads

Ghoulish
Replies
78
Views
1K
Jager
Jager
T4deoIncel0s
Replies
23
Views
1K
T4deoIncel0s
T4deoIncel0s
FiendFiend
Replies
12
Views
210
iethnichorse
iethnichorse

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top