Jesus (Accurate depiction)

[holy]

Based on archaeological and historical evidence from 1st century Galilean Jews:

Height:
- Around 5'5" (1.65m)
- Average for men in that region and time

Build:
- Lean but muscular
-He was a tekton (carpenter/craftsman), which meant daily physical labor.
- Not the soft, ethereal figure from Western art.

Skin:
- Brown, weathered from sun exposure
- Olive-brown Middle Eastern complexion, not the pale European look from Renaissance paintings.

Face:

- Broad Semitic features
- Dark brown/black eyes
- Dark brown/black hair
- Short beard (standard for Jewish men)
- Would have had visible aging/wrinkles by 30+ in that climate

Hair:

- Dark, probably black
- Shorter than Western depictions (long hair was considered effeminate)
- Likely curly/kinky texture
- Would have been kept neat (Nazarites were the exception for long, unkempt hair)

Clothing:

- Basic unmarked tunic (chitōn)
- Outer cloak (himation)
- Plain sandals
- All made from basic wool/linen
- Natural undyed colors (expensive dyes were for wealthy)

So basically:
A short, muscular, brown-skinned Middle Eastern Jewish man with short dark hair and beard, wearing simple working-class clothes.
Would have looked exactly like what he was - a 1st century Galilean Jewish craftsman.

The blonde, blue-eyed European Jesus is pure fantasy.
The long-haired hippie Jesus is historical nonsense.

He would have looked like any other working-class Jewish man from that region and time period.

 

[shia.jihadist]

chad

 

[holy]

chad

definitely.

 

[Deleted member 101850]

Based on archaeological and historical evidence from 1st century Galilean Jews:

Height:
- Around 5'5" (1.65m)
- Average for men in that region and time

Build:
- Lean but muscular
-He was a tekton (carpenter/craftsman), which meant daily physical labor.
- Not the soft, ethereal figure from Western art.

Skin:
- Brown, weathered from sun exposure
- Olive-brown Middle Eastern complexion, not the pale European look from Renaissance paintings.

Face:

- Broad Semitic features
- Dark brown/black eyes
- Dark brown/black hair
- Short beard (standard for Jewish men)
- Would have had visible aging/wrinkles by 30+ in that climate

Hair:

- Dark, probably black
- Shorter than Western depictions (long hair was considered effeminate)
- Likely curly/kinky texture
- Would have been kept neat (Nazarites were the exception for long, unkempt hair)

Clothing:

- Basic unmarked tunic (chitōn)
- Outer cloak (himation)
- Plain sandals
- All made from basic wool/linen
- Natural undyed colors (expensive dyes were for wealthy)

So basically:
A short, muscular, brown-skinned Middle Eastern Jewish man with short dark hair and beard, wearing simple working-class clothes.
Would have looked exactly like what he was - a 1st century Galilean Jewish craftsman.

The blonde, blue-eyed European Jesus is pure fantasy.
The long-haired hippie Jesus is historical nonsense.

He would have looked like any other working-class Jewish man from that region and time period.

View attachment 3600199​

Good beard. Looks thick

 

[manoymanomaxing]

 

[Altruist]

Existence

- 404​

 

[asdvek]

Looks like the average homeless faggot

 

[160cmcurry]

jew

 

[Enytraina]

Height:
- Around 5'5" (1.65m)​

Over

 

[LatentIntellectual]

Whatever he looked like, he was pretty based

"Praise him forever and ever"

 

[FiendFiend]

Based on archaeological and historical evidence from 1st century Galilean Jews:

Height:
- Around 5'5" (1.65m)
- Average for men in that region and time

Build:
- Lean but muscular
-He was a tekton (carpenter/craftsman), which meant daily physical labor.
- Not the soft, ethereal figure from Western art.

Skin:
- Brown, weathered from sun exposure
- Olive-brown Middle Eastern complexion, not the pale European look from Renaissance paintings.

Face:

- Broad Semitic features
- Dark brown/black eyes
- Dark brown/black hair
- Short beard (standard for Jewish men)
- Would have had visible aging/wrinkles by 30+ in that climate

Hair:

- Dark, probably black
- Shorter than Western depictions (long hair was considered effeminate)
- Likely curly/kinky texture
- Would have been kept neat (Nazarites were the exception for long, unkempt hair)

Clothing:

- Basic unmarked tunic (chitōn)
- Outer cloak (himation)
- Plain sandals
- All made from basic wool/linen
- Natural undyed colors (expensive dyes were for wealthy)

So basically:
A short, muscular, brown-skinned Middle Eastern Jewish man with short dark hair and beard, wearing simple working-class clothes.
Would have looked exactly like what he was - a 1st century Galilean Jewish craftsman.

The blonde, blue-eyed European Jesus is pure fantasy.
The long-haired hippie Jesus is historical nonsense.

He would have looked like any other working-class Jewish man from that region and time period.

View attachment 3600199​

pilate said he had light eyes and light hair. Jesus was blonde or brown hair with blue eyes. Over

 

[FiendFiend]

Based on archaeological and historical evidence from 1st century Galilean Jews:

Height:
- Around 5'5" (1.65m)
- Average for men in that region and time

Build:
- Lean but muscular
-He was a tekton (carpenter/craftsman), which meant daily physical labor.
- Not the soft, ethereal figure from Western art.

Skin:
- Brown, weathered from sun exposure
- Olive-brown Middle Eastern complexion, not the pale European look from Renaissance paintings.

Face:

- Broad Semitic features
- Dark brown/black eyes
- Dark brown/black hair
- Short beard (standard for Jewish men)
- Would have had visible aging/wrinkles by 30+ in that climate

Hair:

- Dark, probably black
- Shorter than Western depictions (long hair was considered effeminate)
- Likely curly/kinky texture
- Would have been kept neat (Nazarites were the exception for long, unkempt hair)

Clothing:

- Basic unmarked tunic (chitōn)
- Outer cloak (himation)
- Plain sandals
- All made from basic wool/linen
- Natural undyed colors (expensive dyes were for wealthy)

So basically:
A short, muscular, brown-skinned Middle Eastern Jewish man with short dark hair and beard, wearing simple working-class clothes.
Would have looked exactly like what he was - a 1st century Galilean Jewish craftsman.

The blonde, blue-eyed European Jesus is pure fantasy.
The long-haired hippie Jesus is historical nonsense.

He would have looked like any other working-class Jewish man from that region and time period.

View attachment 3600199​

native levantine people were white before arab conquests.

 

[jeremyy]

Based on archaeological and historical evidence from 1st century Galilean Jews:

Height:
- Around 5'5" (1.65m)
- Average for men in that region and time

Build:
- Lean but muscular
-He was a tekton (carpenter/craftsman), which meant daily physical labor.
- Not the soft, ethereal figure from Western art.

Skin:
- Brown, weathered from sun exposure
- Olive-brown Middle Eastern complexion, not the pale European look from Renaissance paintings.

Face:

- Broad Semitic features
- Dark brown/black eyes
- Dark brown/black hair
- Short beard (standard for Jewish men)
- Would have had visible aging/wrinkles by 30+ in that climate

Hair:

- Dark, probably black
- Shorter than Western depictions (long hair was considered effeminate)
- Likely curly/kinky texture
- Would have been kept neat (Nazarites were the exception for long, unkempt hair)

Clothing:

- Basic unmarked tunic (chitōn)
- Outer cloak (himation)
- Plain sandals
- All made from basic wool/linen
- Natural undyed colors (expensive dyes were for wealthy)

So basically:
A short, muscular, brown-skinned Middle Eastern Jewish man with short dark hair and beard, wearing simple working-class clothes.
Would have looked exactly like what he was - a 1st century Galilean Jewish craftsman.

The blonde, blue-eyed European Jesus is pure fantasy.
The long-haired hippie Jesus is historical nonsense.

He would have looked like any other working-class Jewish man from that region and time period.

View attachment 3600199​

 

[holy]

Existence

- 404​

You're genuinely retarded if you think he didn't exist.

No, like, really retarded. Even atheistic scholars knew he existed.

 

[davidlaidisme67]

jew

Even being a Jew didn’t save him from other Jews

 

[holy]

average homeless faggot

Jfl "homeless" and it's just someone with a beard and slight wrinkles. The internet has completely fucked you retards perception of what anyone in real life actually looks like

 

[CorinthianLOX]

Based on archaeological and historical evidence from 1st century Galilean Jews:

Height:
- Around 5'5" (1.65m)
- Average for men in that region and time

Build:
- Lean but muscular
-He was a tekton (carpenter/craftsman), which meant daily physical labor.
- Not the soft, ethereal figure from Western art.

Skin:
- Brown, weathered from sun exposure
- Olive-brown Middle Eastern complexion, not the pale European look from Renaissance paintings.

Face:

- Broad Semitic features
- Dark brown/black eyes
- Dark brown/black hair
- Short beard (standard for Jewish men)
- Would have had visible aging/wrinkles by 30+ in that climate

Hair:

- Dark, probably black
- Shorter than Western depictions (long hair was considered effeminate)
- Likely curly/kinky texture
- Would have been kept neat (Nazarites were the exception for long, unkempt hair)

Clothing:

- Basic unmarked tunic (chitōn)
- Outer cloak (himation)
- Plain sandals
- All made from basic wool/linen
- Natural undyed colors (expensive dyes were for wealthy)

So basically:
A short, muscular, brown-skinned Middle Eastern Jewish man with short dark hair and beard, wearing simple working-class clothes.
Would have looked exactly like what he was - a 1st century Galilean Jewish craftsman.

The blonde, blue-eyed European Jesus is pure fantasy.
The long-haired hippie Jesus is historical nonsense.

He would have looked like any other working-class Jewish man from that region and time period.

View attachment 3600199​

King of the jews