JFL At Republicans Who Call Biden "Far Left" and a "Communist"

T

ToursOverBoyo2020

Luminary
Joined
Dec 17, 2019
Posts
5,714
Reputation
10,258
Biden is actually a right winger and would be considered far right in European Countries but anyone to the left of Reagan is a communist in the eyes of Republicans. There is no such as "far left" in the US. The so called "far left" in the US would be considered center-left in Europe if that.
 
  • JFL
  • +1
  • Ugh..
Reactions: AutisticBeaner, Warlow, Deleted member 906 and 3 others
america will never have anything close to what the British left is, we had genuine communists Corbyn and McDonnell almost in power recently. the closest thing america has is Sanders who is a career nobody in politics that has not actually done anything.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Warlow
Biden is actually a right winger and would be considered far right in European Countries but anyone to the left of Reagan is a communist in the eyes of Republicans. There is no such as "far left" in the US. The so called "far left" in the US would be considered center-left in Europe if that.

- Supporter of extremely racist BLM - people who actually would like to partite property in socialist style, organise state institutions through racial agenda and end all discrimination (blacks making crime) with violence and re-education camps
- Does not give a damn about any right-wing stuff: family life, small private property, tradition
- Does care about all of the LGBTQ+ Feminist, progressive agenda


Far left wing and globalist agenda actor for the current 2020 elections.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 906
Nixon 2020
1597521478493
 
  • +1
  • Love it
Reactions: Toth's thot and RichmondBread
america will never have anything close to what the British left is, we had genuine communists Corbyn and McDonnell almost in power recently. the closest thing america has is Sanders who is a career nobody in politics that has not actually done anything.
1597521489886
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 4209
Johnny Rebel 2020
 
  • +1
Reactions: Shebe and RichmondBread
1503369859823


BLM and Biden would like the same to happen to the USA
(and actually is there a bit when you look at Chicago or Seattle right now)
 
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Warlow, Deleted member 906 and NarcyChadlite
He's whatever people want him to be to get elected. If he's speaking to a more conservative area he's America First. If he's talking to stupid leftist zoomers hes open borders , take away guns, and Socialist.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 1476, Patriot and Deleted member 4430
Americans are LEGIT retarded to the point that it’s actually disturbing
 
  • +1
Reactions: Tusseleif and ToursOverBoyo2020
He's whatever people want him to be to get elected. If he's speaking to a more conservative area he's America First. If he's talking to stupid leftist zoomers hes open borders , take away guns, and Socialist.
this is how elections work in every democratic country. it is what it is.
 
  • Love it
Reactions: Toth's thot
 
  • +1
  • Ugh..
Reactions: Marsiere214 and Patriot
Jfl if you support Biden over trump
You’re right tho Biden isn’t far left by international standards tho

Biden is not "far left" by (((international standards))).

Really makes you think.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 906
Jfl if you support Biden over trump
You’re right tho Biden isn’t far left by international standards tho

Don't support either. Both are Zionist Establishment Puppets who will continue the endless wars, work for the billionaire class, and worship Isr@el.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Warlow
bernie or bust
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 4466 and ToursOverBoyo2020
Racepill is brutal.

South Africa used to be VERY well-off back then, even for blacks. Way better than now.
Now in the US you got stuff like this (basically South America in smaller scale)

Blacks were huddled into Bantu stans. Small patches of land that held 80%+ of the population. Full of crime and poverty. Blacks in South Africa got screwed back then and screwed now. They should of been integrated from the start
 
  • +1
Reactions: Insecure03
Blacks were huddled into Bantu stans. Small patches of land that held 80%+ of the population. Full of crime and poverty. Blacks in South Africa got screwed back then and screwed now. They should of been integrated from the start


"Bophutatswana was the richest of the Bantustans because it had platinum mines that accounted for 2/3 of the total production of this metal in the Western world. It was also rich in asbestos, granite, vanadium deposits, chromium and manganese. The additional proceeds came from a casino in Sun City, which was a day's drive from Johannesburg and Pretoria where, as in all South Africa, gambling was banned by the ruling National Party. "


So the Whites gave Ts'wan's people not only independence, but also enormous riches and allowed them to do whatever they liked (even if the Whites did not like it). Unfortunately: the Progressive World did not recognize this, apartheid was abolished in South Africa, the rule of the Whites was taken away, the Reds came to power (yes: Soviet agents, communists), Zulu, Xhosa and other Hottentots deprived the Ts'wans of independence - and the Progressive World did not squeal, because this is what blacks did, not whites, so they're allowed. Progressive world was even happy - because the Progressive Negroes put an end to the nationalism of the customs.

And an interesting fact: to the north of Bophutatswana is independent Botswana, ruled by the Ts'vanas. It is the richest country in Africa, with a growth rate of 9% . Do you know why? (apart from diamonds)
Because the constitution of Botswana forbids accepting any loans, subsidies and any aid from abroad!
 
Last edited:

"Bophutatswana was the richest of the Bantustans because it had platinum mines that accounted for 2/3 of the total production of this metal in the Western world. It was also rich in asbestos, granite, vanadium deposits, chromium and manganese. The additional proceeds came from a casino in Sun City, which was a day's drive from Johannesburg and Pretoria where, as in all South Africa, gambling was banned by the ruling National Party. "


So the Whites gave Ts'wan's people not only independence, but also enormous riches and allowed them to do whatever they liked (even if the Whites did not like it). Unfortunately: the Progressive World did not recognize this, apartheid was abolished in South Africa, the rule of the Whites was taken away, the Reds came to power (yes: Soviet agents, communists), Zulu, Xhosa and other Hottentots deprived the Ts'wans of independence - and the Progressive World did not squeal, because this is what blacks did, not whites, so they're allowed. Progressive world was even happy - because the Progressive Negroes put an end to the nationalism of the customs.

And an interesting fact: to the north of Bophutatswana is independent Botswana, ruled by the Ts'vanas. It is the richest country in Africa, with a growth rate of 9% . Do you know why?
Because the constitution of Botswana forbids accepting any loans, subsidies and any aid from abroad!
This is an extreme outlier example. Most Bantu stans were absolute shitholes. This one was successful due to being on a giant plot of natural resources. Most black South Africans were poor during apartheid and still are poor.

I agree that the progressive world meddled in and eventually, destroyed South Africa. Incentives to transition to a non apartheid state through a slow process would of been better
 
This is an extreme outlier example. Most Bantu stans were absolute shitholes. This one was successful due to being on a giant plot of natural resources. Most black South Africans were poor during apartheid and still are poor.

I agree that the progressive world meddled in and eventually, destroyed South Africa. Incentives to transition to a non apartheid state through a slow process would of been better

I agree, rapid decolonisation (also fueled by communists) was retarded and ended with stuff like Zimbabwe and Mugabe.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Blackout.xl

"Bophutatswana was the richest of the Bantustans because it had platinum mines that accounted for 2/3 of the total production of this metal in the Western world. It was also rich in asbestos, granite, vanadium deposits, chromium and manganese. The additional proceeds came from a casino in Sun City, which was a day's drive from Johannesburg and Pretoria where, as in all South Africa, gambling was banned by the ruling National Party. "


So the Whites gave Ts'wan's people not only independence, but also enormous riches and allowed them to do whatever they liked (even if the Whites did not like it). Unfortunately: the Progressive World did not recognize this, apartheid was abolished in South Africa, the rule of the Whites was taken away, the Reds came to power (yes: Soviet agents, communists), Zulu, Xhosa and other Hottentots deprived the Ts'wans of independence - and the Progressive World did not squeal, because this is what blacks did, not whites, so they're allowed. Progressive world was even happy - because the Progressive Negroes put an end to the nationalism of the customs.

And an interesting fact: to the north of Bophutatswana is independent Botswana, ruled by the Ts'vanas. It is the richest country in Africa, with a growth rate of 9% . Do you know why? (apart from diamonds)
Because the constitution of Botswana forbids accepting any loans, subsidies and any aid from abroad!
Jfl at calling the bantusans independent and rich, they literally forced the majority of the population into less than 10% of the land, and forced them to carry passes to work in South Africa, the only aspect where they were truly independent was when the government recorded crime statistics, hence the “170 murders a year”
 
  • +1
Reactions: Blackout.xl
Jfl at calling the bantusans independent and rich, they literally forced the majority of the population into less than 10% of the land, and forced them to carry passes to work in South Africa, the only aspect where they were truly independent was when the government recorded crime statistics, hence the “170 murders a year”
I don't deny this, but IMHO the main reason of destabilization was massive migration from the other african states, masses of blacks flew from s%itholes to the South America. Especialy after 1960.


1534872090437
 
  • +1
Reactions: Blackout.xl
I don't deny this, but IMHO the main reason of destabilization was massive migration from the other african states, masses of blacks flew from s%itholes to the South America. Especialy after 1960.


View attachment 591316

the population growth was just because blacks here breed alot jfl but since 94 we've had a shitton of african immigrants tbh, the main reason why the country hasnt improved much is because basically since after mandelas presidency the government has been going to shit cuz they corrupt asf
 
the population growth was just because blacks here breed alot jfl but since 94 we've had a shitton of african immigrants tbh, the main reason why the country hasnt improved much is because basically since after mandelas presidency the government has been going to shit cuz they corrupt asf

You should note also all kind of socialist, racist, any-white (basically anti-upper class) agenda in the South Africa, like racial quotas in certain areas of economy (even if non-whties do not have the same qualifications) or brutal expropriation of rural land from whites with no compensation. The end of aprarthaid actually ceded the power from whites, who got some idea about economy and ruling in general to sub 90IQ commie mob. We saw same stuff in Rhodesia already. Thank Lord almighty there are some normal states like Botswana without such racist, retarded policies.
1521002273404
Zimbabwe land meme lel white
Rhodesia

 
shut up libtard
 
You should note also all kind of socialist, racist, any-white (basically anti-upper class) agenda in the South Africa, like racial quotas in certain areas of economy (even if non-whties do not have the same qualifications) or brutal expropriation of rural land from whites with no compensation. The end of aprarthaid actually ceded the power from whites, who got some idea about economy and ruling in general to sub 90IQ commie mob. We saw same stuff in Rhodesia already. Thank Lord almighty there are some normal states like Botswana without such racist, retarded policies.
View attachment 593276View attachment 593284View attachment 593297
View attachment 593288
You should note also all kind of socialist, racist, any-white (basically anti-upper class) agenda in the South Africa, like racial quotas in certain areas of economy (even if non-whties do not have the same qualifications) or brutal expropriation of rural land from whites with no compensation. The end of aprarthaid actually ceded the power from whites, who got some idea about economy and ruling in general to sub 90IQ commie mob. We saw same stuff in Rhodesia already. Thank Lord almighty there are some normal states like Botswana without such racist, retarded policies.
View attachment 593276View attachment 593284View attachment 593297
View attachment 593288

white genocide in South Africa is a meme, the government has barely expropriated any land, ironically more people complain that the government hasn’t done enough to fix the inequality, rather than done too much. White people (9% of the population) still own the majority of private land and still hold the majority of the country’s wealth, and their unemployment rate is 6% compared to like 40% for the rest of the country. basically the only crime that youre more likely to be a victim of as a white person are home robberies (due to their greater wealth), and even that im skeptical of because black people are far less likely to report such a crime. the only thing that has truly changed is that they no longer have political power, and because some can’t cope with that they make up the white genocide and say we will end up like Zimbabwe and media overseas legitimizes it. I dont live in Zim, so I cant speak for it, what I do know is that our situation is incomparable to theirs.
 
white genocide in South Africa is a meme, the government has barely expropriated any land, ironically more people complain that the government hasn’t done enough to fix the inequality, rather than done too much. White people (9% of the population) still own the majority of private land and still hold the majority of the country’s wealth, and their unemployment rate is 6% compared to like 40% for the rest of the country. basically the only crime that youre more likely to be a victim of as a white person are home robberies (due to their greater wealth), and even that im skeptical of because black people are far less likely to report such a crime. the only thing that has truly changed is that they no longer have political power, and because some can’t cope with that they make up the white genocide and say we will end up like Zimbabwe and media overseas legitimizes it. I dont live in Zim, so I cant speak for it, what I do know is that our situation is incomparable to theirs.

NO GENOCIDE?

30,000 white people killed out of a population of 4.5 million since 1994 ? (South African Crime Stats)
Let's say there are 196 million Whites in the US. 196/4.5=43.5 times more white population in the US
43.5 x 30,000=1,305,000

Dr. Gregory Stanton who was the head of the United Nations Security Council's Rwandan Criminal Tribunal and the head of the Cambodian Genocide Project is saying that the number is 70,000 whites since 1994.

If that is true and I don't see why he would be lying, He is the leading person in the world on genocide and used to run genocidewatch.com

70,000 people out of a population of 4.5 million ? (Interpol / fromer Genocidewatch.com Stats)
There are 196 million Whites in the US. 196/4.5=43.5 times more white population in the US
43.5 x 70,000=3,045,000

NOW Karin Smith is saying the number is actually 120,000

120,000 people out of a population of 4.5 million ? (Interpol / Genocidewatch.com Stats)
There are 196 million Whites in the US. 196/4.5=43.5 times more white population in the US
43.5 x 120,000= 5,220,000

So that is the equivalent of almost 1.3 - 5.2 million US Whites being killed since 1994 (23 years)
That's the equivalent of 56,739 to 226,086 (141,412 avg) US Whites a year being murdered..

That's insane.

Next stuff. Thank Lord almighty that government didn't take so much land (a legalise form of theft commit by commies since the very beggining) to fix "inequality" or otherwise blacks would be now dying from starvation like they did in Zimbabawe.

Let's one day angry mob is gonna go to your house because people got such whim. Of course they would not say about robbery and free gibs (the real deal) but fixing "inequality"

Have you ever been to Cape Town?
If you are white and you would go a bit into the streets full of blacks, away from the main tourists street your camera and phone would be gone in few minutes, sometimes also with your life.|

Also don't forget that in the cities whites got to life in houses with tall walls and barbed wire to stop black mob who would like to fix "inequality".


1597667099545


Of course left-extremists, racist reforms have great impact on the economy.




White = usually effective enterprises with high-skilled employees.

1597667345529
 
Useless to compare anyone to European politicians. Europe is a far-left nightmare zone.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Patriot
NO GENOCIDE?

30,000 white people killed out of a population of 4.5 million since 1994 ? (South African Crime Stats)
Let's say there are 196 million Whites in the US. 196/4.5=43.5 times more white population in the US
43.5 x 30,000=1,305,000
it seems youre greatly underestimating the amount of crime in SA, idk where you got that number from but imma assume its correct. More than 500 000 murders since 1994 in SA for everyone

30000/500000=6% however whites are 9% and their relative population was even higher in the past, so if that number is correct then it just proves that its safer to be white

Dr. Gregory Stanton who was the head of the United Nations Security Council's Rwandan Criminal Tribunal and the head of the Cambodian Genocide Project is saying that the number is 70,000 whites since 1994.

If that is true and I don't see why he would be lying, He is the leading person in the world on genocide and used to run genocidewatch.com

70,000 people out of a population of 4.5 million ? (Interpol / fromer Genocidewatch.com Stats)
There are 196 million Whites in the US. 196/4.5=43.5 times more white population in the US
43.5 x 70,000=3,045,000

NOW Karin Smith is saying the number is actually 120,000

120,000 people out of a population of 4.5 million ? (Interpol / Genocidewatch.com Stats)
There are 196 million Whites in the US. 196/4.5=43.5 times more white population in the US
43.5 x 120,000= 5,220,000

So that is the equivalent of almost 1.3 - 5.2 million US Whites being killed since 1994 (23 years)
That's the equivalent of 56,739 to 226,086 (141,412 avg) US Whites a year being murdered..

That's insane.

I tried searching for these supposed claims by Gregory Stanton and literally nothing was coming up, which is very odd since he is a relevant person so I suspect that you got the claim from a random afrikaner website or facebook page. If you could provide a link to a reliable site for that claim that would be great.

Genocidewatch.com puts SA at stage 6 of genocide, there are 10 stages, stage 7 is preparation and stage 9 is extermination so this doesnt actually prove your point.

the only stuff I could find on interpol.net abt SA was stuff abt organized crime not genocide.

jfl who is Karin Smith, the only thing that came up when I searched for her was a 65 year old german javelin thrower so assuming that is her, she obviously isnt a credible source.

Next stuff. Thank Lord almighty that government didn't take so much land (a legalise form of theft commit by commies since the very beggining) to fix "inequality" or otherwise blacks would be now dying from starvation like they did in Zimbabawe.

Let's one day angry mob is gonna go to your house because people got such whim. Of course they would not say about robbery and free gibs (the real deal) but fixing "inequality"

Have you ever been to Cape Town?
If you are white and you would go a bit into the streets full of blacks, away from the main tourists street your camera and phone would be gone in few minutes, sometimes also with your life.|

Also don't forget that in the cities whites got to life in houses with tall walls and barbed wire to stop black mob who would like to fix "inequality".
none of this was really evidence, we are considered the most unequal country in the world https://edition.cnn.com/2019/05/07/africa/south-africa-elections-inequality-intl/index.html so its not like im making up this “inequality” jfl. Its funny that you mention Cape Town because I had lived their for the majority of my life, and if any rich person were to go into a black township, they would get robbed, its just that people know that whites are wealthy so they will obviously get robbed unless they look like they are homeless. And the taking of your life is a bit dramatic. Also since youve brought up Cape Town, you should know that most of the crime happens in the townships (poor non-white areas) so Cape Town actually contradicts the white genocide myth.
cape-town-2011-race-by-ward.png
Crime-Cape-Town.jpg
Im kinda lazy to post the links for these images but if you want, I can. you can clearly see that the concentration of crime is in Black and Coloured(mixed ancestry) neighbourhood



View attachment 595762

Of course left-extremists, racist reforms have great impact on the economy.




White = usually effective enterprises with high-skilled employees.

View attachment 595767
for the 2nd link it mentions the employment equity act, https://www.gov.za/sites/default/files/gcis_document/201409/a55-980.pdf In the affirmative actions section it explains that businesses must have measures in place to improve diversity, so if a business were to get fined its not necessarily because there are too many white people but more so that there is effort being done to get more black people

The 1st and 3rd links are accurate but the titles are very misleading, if you read further into the articles it explains how white people are being excluded from benefiting from schemes that are meant to help provide jobs such as BEE (which is true), we know that this is not happening on a large enough scale to make whites economically disempowered because when compared to black people we know that they are still very wealthy.

Ive already explained that white people easily have the lowest unemployment rate (1st world standard). https://businesstech.co.za/news/bus...ill-change-your-thinking-on-employment-in-sa/

these are a few graphs that really highlight how whites are still economically empowered, e,g 52% of new people recruited into jobs were white people.

I have no reason to make this shit up, im mixed race, my father is a black nigerian immigrant, my mother is a white south african whom ive been living with my whole life, I have no relatives who are black south africans. I think the lives of white people in SA get compared to the lives of people in 1st world countries instead of the lives of SA blacks, which makes it seem like they are victims, which is true, they are victims of a corrupt government, they are victims of crimes, but so is everybody else here. There are extremists such as the EFF that have said racist things, but they arent even the 2nd largest party, the only reason they say such shit is to gain votes.
 

Similar threads

R3nd4nqzar
Replies
0
Views
26
R3nd4nqzar
R3nd4nqzar
davidlaidisme67
Replies
7
Views
42
davidlaidisme67
davidlaidisme67
UrFavSub5
Replies
12
Views
113
Aox Ofwar
Aox Ofwar
pepotero
Replies
15
Views
86
kisslessvirgin
kisslessvirgin

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top