dreamcake1mo
Solstice
- Joined
- May 12, 2022
- Posts
- 2,318
- Reputation
- 3,501
Its deceptive how unspoken this is talked about.
For the "middle class" Specifics could be identified and labeled, but if one were to understand how genders work, this would not be needed to do publicly and instead on a individual/automatic basis.
For some reason, todays society choose to deceptively replace this categorization and understanding with LGBQT and other silly things like varying names of "syndromes". A male cannot "turn" into a women (The duration, composition, etc. of sex hormones effect gender-prolific brain patterns, so a sudden "switch" between male and female is not possible due to the infinite complexities of body and gender-related chemical composition and how it accumulatively affects your brain patterns overtime).
For example. Who is more masculine; a "male" born with a vagina, a male who removed his penis, a women who "grew" one, or a women born with a penis? (trick question, the male born with one is the most masculine, the female who grew a penis the most feminine, with the others eunuchs (with the type/dominate gender of eunech depending on the process and chemical composition in utero.) Chemical composition determine physical traits.
Society has it correct when they claim that people can be mixed with both sides, but theres one that they fail to identify, and that is the biological male.
Males are biologically more rare. In specific, the seed system. Also, the male body development simply requires more resources. (Higher metabolism, higher energy output etc). Hence, why geographic and worldwide quality control factors such as vaccines, hormonal disruptors (like how studies here show female birth control masculinized the brain (aka disrupt your chemical composition to move closer to the line), soy products, or other deterring quality products such DNA/hormonal altering drugs etc.). Play a huge role in these DNA/seed template/hormone issues.
This is what the "gender" should look like.
Biological male
BE male (+-intersex)
T women (+-intersex)
E women
Whats the point of all this? Well, i think people should recognize these differences. I believe in fairness, not equality. People are not the same. Genders of people are not the same. A intersex male is not the same as a biological male and will not behave the same. A intersex women is not of the same nature than a E women. Different traits should be treated accordingly. And i think its important to highlight these differences or misrepresentation starts to occur (im tired of catching strays from homosexuals and or high E men).
Speaking about the human animal, most man and women have intersex symptoms. With some ethnicities this is even more evident. I long suspect that the majority of men and women share traits of the opposite sex. These traits are a tell tale sign of chemical composition. And composition determines behavior/mind patterns. The difference between male and female is not a switch. Its a line, one you cant pass, with people closer or further away from the line than others. Your identification is based on how far away or close you are to the line, with a middle class for those opposite sex who are very close to each other.For the "middle class" Specifics could be identified and labeled, but if one were to understand how genders work, this would not be needed to do publicly and instead on a individual/automatic basis.
This middle class since old times were called "eunechs".
For some reason, todays society choose to deceptively replace this categorization and understanding with LGBQT and other silly things like varying names of "syndromes". A male cannot "turn" into a women (The duration, composition, etc. of sex hormones effect gender-prolific brain patterns, so a sudden "switch" between male and female is not possible due to the infinite complexities of body and gender-related chemical composition and how it accumulatively affects your brain patterns overtime).
For example. Who is more masculine; a "male" born with a vagina, a male who removed his penis, a women who "grew" one, or a women born with a penis? (trick question, the male born with one is the most masculine, the female who grew a penis the most feminine, with the others eunuchs (with the type/dominate gender of eunech depending on the process and chemical composition in utero.) Chemical composition determine physical traits.
Society has it correct when they claim that people can be mixed with both sides, but theres one that they fail to identify, and that is the biological male.
Males are biologically more rare. In specific, the seed system. Also, the male body development simply requires more resources. (Higher metabolism, higher energy output etc). Hence, why geographic and worldwide quality control factors such as vaccines, hormonal disruptors (like how studies here show female birth control masculinized the brain (aka disrupt your chemical composition to move closer to the line), soy products, or other deterring quality products such DNA/hormonal altering drugs etc.). Play a huge role in these DNA/seed template/hormone issues.
This is what the "gender" should look like.
Biological male
BE male (+-intersex)
T women (+-intersex)
E women
Whats the point of all this? Well, i think people should recognize these differences. I believe in fairness, not equality. People are not the same. Genders of people are not the same. A intersex male is not the same as a biological male and will not behave the same. A intersex women is not of the same nature than a E women. Different traits should be treated accordingly. And i think its important to highlight these differences or misrepresentation starts to occur (im tired of catching strays from homosexuals and or high E men).
Last edited:
