
thecel
morph king
- Joined
- May 16, 2020
- Posts
- 26,097
- Reputation
- 56,131
Lateral orbital rims should be relatively recessed with respect to the eyeball.
Forward-grown lateral orbital rims (LOR) are PSL cope. Forward LOR is a Mongoloid trait and gives the eye area a flat, boxy, "constricted", Mongoloid look. As you can see below:
Compare that to the Caucasoid eye area, in which the LOR is significantly set back from the nose bridge as well as the eyeball:
Margot Robbie has very backwards-set LORs:
Forward-set LORs flatten the eye area and look like shit:
Example of LOR too forward-set relative to where the eyeball would be:
Example of back-set LOR, leaving more of the side of the eyeball exposed from the bone:
Now here’s the discussion question: why is this attractive at all?
Isn’t leaving more of the sides of the eyes exposed bad for survival? Less bone-protected eyeballs means the eyes are easier to damage. For example, an arrow shot to the side of the head is more likely to pierce the eye. Does anyone know why we evolved to prefer this aesthetic?
Forward-grown lateral orbital rims (LOR) are PSL cope. Forward LOR is a Mongoloid trait and gives the eye area a flat, boxy, "constricted", Mongoloid look. As you can see below:



Compare that to the Caucasoid eye area, in which the LOR is significantly set back from the nose bridge as well as the eyeball:


Margot Robbie has very backwards-set LORs:

Forward-set LORs flatten the eye area and look like shit:

Example of LOR too forward-set relative to where the eyeball would be:

Example of back-set LOR, leaving more of the side of the eyeball exposed from the bone:

Now here’s the discussion question: why is this attractive at all?
Isn’t leaving more of the sides of the eyes exposed bad for survival? Less bone-protected eyeballs means the eyes are easier to damage. For example, an arrow shot to the side of the head is more likely to pierce the eye. Does anyone know why we evolved to prefer this aesthetic?
Last edited: