Lateral Orbital Rims Should Be RECESSED

thecel

thecel

morph king
Joined
May 16, 2020
Posts
26,310
Reputation
56,768
Lateral orbital rims should be relatively recessed with respect to the eyeball.

Forward-grown lateral orbital rims (LOR) are PSL cope. Forward LOR is a Mongoloid trait and gives the eye area a flat, boxy, "constricted", Mongoloid look. As you can see below:

1748672141821
1748672182446
1748672193767


Compare that to the Caucasoid eye area, in which the LOR is significantly set back from the nose bridge as well as the eyeball:

1748672693710
1748673084077


Margot Robbie has very backwards-set LORs:

1748671866268


Forward-set LORs flatten the eye area and look like shit:

1748671853584


Example of LOR too forward-set relative to where the eyeball would be:

1748672558374


Example of back-set LOR, leaving more of the side of the eyeball exposed from the bone:

1748672609659


Now here’s the discussion question: why is this attractive at all?

Isn’t leaving more of the sides of the eyes exposed bad for survival? Less bone-protected eyeballs means the eyes are easier to damage. For example, an arrow shot to the side of the head is more likely to pierce the eye. Does anyone know why we evolved to prefer this aesthetic?
 
Last edited:
  • +1
  • Woah
  • Love it
Reactions: aryan mogger, Debetro, Seevor and 14 others
Thecel
 
  • +1
Reactions: EthiopianMaxxer and thecel
what causes the aegyo sal on the first white guy? also does no aegyo sal vs just flat undereye area indicate anything?
 
Last edited:
  • Woah
  • +1
Reactions: 3links2 and thecel
are u doctor yet?
 
  • JFL
Reactions: thecel
Now here’s the discussion question: why is this attractive at all?

Isn’t leaving more of the sides of the eyes exposed bad for survival? Less bone-protected eyeballs means the eyes are easier to damage. For example, an arrow shot to the side of the head is more likely to pierce the eye. Does anyone know why we evolved to prefer this aesthetic?

Thoughts?
 
  • +1
Reactions: mandiblade, Lord Shadow, aloooeJIEEES and 1 other person
Lateral orbital rims should be relatively recessed with respect to the eyeball.

Forward-grown lateral orbital rims (LOR) are PSL cope. Forward LOR is a Mongoloid trait and gives the eye area a flat, boxy, Mongoloid look. As you can see below:

View attachment 3787209View attachment 3787211View attachment 3787212

Compare that to the Caucasoid eye area, in which the LOR is significantly set back from the nose bridge as well as the eyeball:

View attachment 3787227View attachment 3787242

Margot Robbie has very backwards-set LORs:

View attachment 3787203

Forward-set LORs flatten the eye area and look like shit:

View attachment 3787202

Example of LOR too forward-set relative to where the eyeball would be:

View attachment 3787219

Example of back-set LOR, leaving more of the side of the eyeball exposed from the bone:

View attachment 3787222

Now here’s the discussion question: why is this attractive at all?

Isn’t leaving more of the sides of the eyes exposed bad for survival? Less bone-protected eyeballs means the eyes are easier to damage. For example, an arrow shot to the side of the head is more likely to pierce the eye. Does anyone know why we evolved to prefer this aesthetic?
Bump
 
  • +1
Reactions: thecel
Interesting. I am on my phone so I don't have any images, but what about forward LORs with wide orbits (in both the breadth of the socket, and their spacing)?
 
  • +1
Reactions: mandiblade, StacyRepellent, JosephGarrot123 and 1 other person
Not all chracteristics are necessary for survival as per evolution. Some traits are remnants if they dont help/harm reproduction

That said I dont know why this is attractive but good post
 
  • +1
Reactions: pajjeetslayer and thecel
also another factor is the shape. I think it starts to look unaesthetic when it is flat, ie in the midpoint is as forward as the lateral supra qnd the lateral infra. That doesn't necesarily mean the LOR should be recessed, but the midpoint should fall slightly behind.
But then it kind of becomes semantics about what you mean by the LOR
 
  • +1
Reactions: mandiblade, StacyRepellent and thecel
1000032141
 
  • JFL
  • +1
  • Love it
Reactions: mandiblade, LegendaryKennen, StacyRepellent and 6 others
Thoughts?
if I had to guess I'd say it's too intimidating females aren't really too evolutionary biased for stuff like that than moreso general health indicators, thats why I think girls like soft boys more than the ogre type more often because high in health indcators higher trust and things similar to that are better to women because back then had to worry more about being kidnapped raped and killed more than having actual relationships and wondering if they're partner would make it back
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: EthiopianMaxxer, thecel and loyolaxavvierretard
Such trait is most likely present because of genetic drift in these populations. Perhaps the most pointable distinction between what is attractive in West and Asia
 
  • +1
Reactions: EthiopianMaxxer and thecel
Good thread, just checked and mine are semi-recessed
 
  • +1
Reactions: seanonigger, thecel and loyolaxavvierretard
Lateral orbital rims should be relatively recessed with respect to the eyeball.
If I am not busy/lazy tomorrow I will make a response thread on this, actually. I am thinking about this more.
1000032142

Look at de poot's angelic eyes, his lateral rims definitely protrude much more than the average person.
 
  • +1
Reactions: mandiblade, StacyRepellent, Lookologist003 and 1 other person
Damn, man. You are on fire lately. Giving me so much to think about that I could not have realised on my own.

Putting this in scope of threads about eye-area would give it some substance.


The canine skeleton has no LOR
product-2587-main-original-1512601527.jpg


Aesthetic face has a much of the orbital cavity in view as seen from the side profile.

5007305_1748672609659.png


While an unasethetic face has very little

5007302_1748672558374.png


I think LOR not so important. More important is the curvature of maxilla and frontal bone. Some curvature of the pair is aesthetic because then the orbital cavity is exposed and lateral canthi bends.


@thecel is it just me or is this something that can improve the facial depth model, as in what you are discribing is an unrecognised component of facial depth? Horizontal distance from tragus to lateral canthi against horizontal distance from tragus to glabella. The first human skull in my post has lower ratio than the second.

PS. Distance from tragus to glabella against facial depth describes recession of forehead.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: thecel
Lateral orbital rims should be relatively recessed with respect to the eyeball.

Forward-grown lateral orbital rims (LOR) are PSL cope. Forward LOR is a Mongoloid trait and gives the eye area a flat, boxy, "constricted", Mongoloid look. As you can see below:

View attachment 3787209View attachment 3787211View attachment 3787212

Compare that to the Caucasoid eye area, in which the LOR is significantly set back from the nose bridge as well as the eyeball:

View attachment 3787227View attachment 3787242

Margot Robbie has very backwards-set LORs:

View attachment 3787203

Forward-set LORs flatten the eye area and look like shit:

View attachment 3787202

Example of LOR too forward-set relative to where the eyeball would be:

View attachment 3787219

Example of back-set LOR, leaving more of the side of the eyeball exposed from the bone:

View attachment 3787222

Now here’s the discussion question: why is this attractive at all?

Isn’t leaving more of the sides of the eyes exposed bad for survival? Less bone-protected eyeballs means the eyes are easier to damage. For example, an arrow shot to the side of the head is more likely to pierce the eye. Does anyone know why we evolved to prefer this aesthetic?
Water, can you morph ?
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Xangsane is SHIT and thecel
 
Well Mine are far too recessed
 
  • So Sad
Reactions: thecel
If I am not busy/lazy tomorrow I will make a response thread on this, actually. I am thinking about this more.
View attachment 3787258
Look at de poot's angelic eyes, his lateral rims definitely protrude much more than the average person.
They're not forward set they're just big/high in mass and wide along the cheekbone
1749156218312



I was actually wondering the same. Whether a deeper orbital like this would be lower fighting success or not.
It's not really about how deep set the eyeball is since that's relatively to the infras, so impact might be different.
I don't know why exactly a deeper orbital seems to provide a more harmonious profile, especially with a more dolichocephalic skull. The backwards longer eyebrows and lashes look very aesthetic for some reason.

08226d021ca66cd3d1d56a3c6269359e
Still, the supras and rim hooding over the part of the eyeball looks very good.
Perhaps multiple factors affect this perception, I can't even find a good quality pic of a person with extremely forward set lateral orbits. Not even asians, just skulls.
 
  • +1
Reactions: mandiblade, Xangsane is SHIT and thecel
Is this part of the reason why some people have shitty pfl

Does Chris Hemsworth have Chinese lateral orbital rims
 
  • Woah
Reactions: thecel
Forward-set LORs flatten the eye area and look like trash:

1748671853584
As far as we can tell, you only really moved her eye wrinkles forward. Perhaps it signals neoteny?

Isn’t leaving more of the sides of the eyes exposed bad for survival? Less bone-protected eyeballs means the eyes are easier to damage. For example, an arrow shot to the side of the head is more likely to pierce the eye. Does anyone know why we evolved to prefer this aesthetic?
Another explanation is that a recessed nasal aperture gives the illusion that the LORs are forward-set. In turn, backward-set LORs give the illusion that the nasal aperture is projected, to an extent. Perhaps the Fisherian runaway selection phenomenon played a role in us desiring a combination of the two, which looks like the nasal aperture is very projected?
My last theory is similar to the last one. As stated, nasal aperture projection will cause the LORs to appear backward-set, and a combination will make it look like the nasal aperture is very projected. Instead of the runway selection phenomenon, maybe proper development > function?
 
  • +1
Reactions: thecel

Similar threads

greycelfaliio
Replies
45
Views
3K
MoggsWithBoness
MoggsWithBoness
copercel123
Replies
73
Views
3K
copercel123
copercel123
menas
Replies
67
Views
3K
iblamemandible7
iblamemandible7
leF
Replies
7
Views
2K
davidlaidisme67
davidlaidisme67

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top