
Deleted Member 0927
Banned
- Joined
- May 31, 2025
- Posts
- 459
- Reputation
- 754
It would also solve many other problems. I don’t understand why people are so against slavery @cromagnon
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Why not just sell people? There’s no reason to select people when you can make the selected choiceOnly way to fix the problem is to line up all the genetic freaks and start the eugenics arc. One year of sorrow for prosperity of humanity, I wouldn't mind it.
Yes, a caste system to maximize human capital would be optimal. But I don't see that happening, considering 90% of humans are subhumanWhy not just sell people? There’s no reason to select people when you can make the selected choice
Like what india had under the aryansYes, a caste system to maximize human capital would be optimal. But I don't see that happening, considering 90% of humans are subhuman
No I mean forced slaveryLike what india had under the aryans
Yes, a caste system to maximize human capital would be optimal. But I don't see that happening, considering 90% of humans are subhuman
The caste system isn’t a good analogy since people of lower castes still can do their own actions. I was thinking in the abolition of the state. Since people can do what they want, anarchism would also solve what the advent of the return of slavery does as wellLike what india had under the aryans
Nah we should just force everyone on earth to pass an iq test and kill everyone below 90It would also solve many other problems. I don’t understand why people are so against slavery @cromagnon
Bringing slavery back doesn’t mean more people from the original population would be slaves since slaves would be bred together since it’s safer and easier to doMost niggas here would be slaves, that would be the ideal
Only high-IQ people would be allowed to mate with slaves. Making great worker-antsBringing slavery back doesn’t mean more people from the original population would be slaves since slaves would be bred together since it’s safer and easier to do
Yes. It will drastically reduce terrorism, crime increase productivity qnd will push human race into a new era of peace and tranquility@Jason Voorhees I found a solution to the worldwide shortage of white women that you mentioned
Awesome then you’ll be the first to enslaveIt would also solve many other problems. I don’t understand why people are so against slavery @cromagnon
yes so can we enslaved you first ? And then we’ll all be happy whilst you worknfor freee yayThe only argument against slavery is “it hurts people and it’s bad”
Otherwise, it’s aristocratic, just and completely moral
I believe you say that I should treat others how I want to be treated. Just as I don’t want to take money and I don’t want to give money, I want to enslave and not to be enslavedAwesome then you’ll be the first to enslave
yes so can we enslaved you first ? And then we’ll all be happy whilst you worknfor freee yay
the argument is how do you prevent a slave class of millions with nothing to lose from tearing the entire system downThe only argument against slavery is “it hurts people and it’s bad”
All modern problems originate from not being allowed to have non consenting individualswhy are you so hung up on enslaving and subjugating other people, its such a cringe 14th century anglo mindset
its short sighted and doesnt work
With all innovations in weaponry and subjugation, how do you expect primal forces to resist modern forces? Do you really believe slave owners would be incapable of making their own logical decisions to proportionally scale it? This wouldn’t involve a collective society but one without the state. If a slave owner looses or gets killed by his slaves it’s his faultthe argument is how do you prevent a slave class of millions with nothing to lose from tearing the entire system down
i mean, sureWith all innovations in weaponry and subjugation, how do you expect primal forces to resist modern forces? Do you really believe slave owners would be incapable of making their own logical decisions to proportionally scale it? This wouldn’t involve a collective society but one without the state. If a slave owner looses or gets killed by his slaves it’s his fault
What is the supposed non abstract non moral subjective argument for laws against slavery?i mean, sure
its a conflict speedrun
intuitively slavery seems unfeasible to me, unless you figure out a way to manufacture insentient robot drones enmasse who arent capable of thinking/revolting
to think the slavery was originally abolished due to some abstract moral objectivist argument (LOL) @cromagnon is peak naivety, if enslaving other humans was economically viable (in the long term) it'd still be a thing (which it is, just in very unsuccessful societies)
Humans are no more dangerous than animals to farmits a conflict speedrun
abstract - game theoryWhat is the supposed non abstract non moral subjective argument for laws against slavery?
Are you a woman?All modern problems originate from not being allowed to have non consenting individuals
Elites don’t care to care to change the system they operate under as long as they can maintain their positionabstract - game theory
non abstract - common sense
if enslaving other humans really is that economically viable (in both the long and short run) then why don't governments/'elites' have an established slave trade concurrently. If your reasoning for why they don't is anything along the lines of referencing their anti slave motives as 'moral objectivism' or justifying the possibility of enslaving humans in the future with the magical hypothetical enslavement tech thats going to be invented after the singularity, i'll be very disappointed
NoAre you a woman?
yawnElites don’t care to care to change the system they operate under as long as they can maintain their position
the answer is: after countless tries they realised the enslaved dalit class would just kill them, despite aforementioned slave clas always being the primal force with subsequent access to primal tech/weaponryElites don’t care to care to change the system they operate under as long as they can maintain their position
t. whiteboi tranime addictIt would also solve many other problems. I don’t understand why people are so against slavery @cromagnon
If it’s not self-evident you have to be mentally retarded. Slave trade is money -> people. Hence:>Makes post saying x solves y
>doesn't argue why
Kill yourself nigger
This isn't the way it works retard, we're not supposed to make the thinking work for you faggot you're supposed to come up with real arguments ans post them. This is shit, people can get jobs and pay for sex but it doesn't fix the inceldom. You dumb cunt.If it’s not self-evident you have to be mentally retarded. Slave trade is money -> people. Hence, money -> sex & money -> artificial gene pools
Slaves aren’t just rentals as prostitutes areThis isn't the way it works retard, we're not supposed to make the thinking work for you faggot you're supposed to come up with real arguments ans post them. This is shit, people can get jobs and pay for sex but it doesn't fix the inceldom. You dumb cunt.
by killing them and keeping them down with superior technology? how do you think slavery as a system worked in the 1600 to 1800s, primitive niggers got pwned by European technology and were used as work tools, and if they revolted they were put down almost immediately. It only stopped because other white people said it was bad JFL.the argument is how do you prevent a slave class of millions with nothing to lose from tearing the entire system down
why would you waste time and money manufacturing drones and robots when you can just feed a family of 4 blacks some corn and you’ll have free work for generations? makes no sensei mean, sure
its a conflict speedrun
intuitively slavery seems unfeasible to me, and if your tech is that innovative then why not manufacture insentient robot drones enmasse who arent capable of thinking/revolting
it actually was. the abolitionist movement in Britain was massive in the early 1800s and was instrumental in dismantling it. If there wasn’t a moralistic component to the abolition of slavery, the British wouldn’t have gone gunning around the world wasting time and money to stop third worlders from enslaving each otherto think the slavery was originally abolished due to some abstract moral objectivist argument (LOL) @cromagnon is peak naivety, if enslaving other humans was economically viable (in the long term) it'd still be a thing (which it is, just in very unsuccessful societies)
So true shawty so trueeeeeIt would also solve many other problems. I don’t understand why people are so against slavery @cromagnon
I'll be your rentalSlaves aren’t just rentals as prostitutes are
I’d be a rich woman’s slave