D
Deleted member 5061
Kraken
- Joined
- Feb 2, 2020
- Posts
- 3,030
- Reputation
- 4,062
So I randomly see a picture of this guy on google, while looking for something entirely different:
Funny enough, his browbone is low set and eyebrows are also low set. His eyeballs are also decently deep set AND he has slight positive canthal tilt. He also has decent hooding and very little upper eyelid exposure. Eyes are vertically not too long. All of those things are needed to have hunter yes.
YET his eye area still looks cucky and ZERO intimidating. It looks soylent and beta like. I guess his eyes are horizontally too short , I cant tell what exactly is making those eyes look zero like hunter and insanely cuck-ish.
Lets move to a different topic, the bluepilled normies, when they watch YT videos or Tik Toks about hunter eyes etc. assume that any eye area that has decent hooding is equal to hunter eyes. Thats insanely low IQ (not surprising).
They think eyes like these (which do have hooding) are hunter like:
I can see how it can be easily confused, because on those examples the dudes have little Upper Eyelid exposure and good hooding, but those are still not hunter eyes. For hunter eyes, the browbone and the actual eyebrow has to be giga low set. If browbone and eyebrow are too high, the eyes will look baby-like, even though the actual eye shape could work to create the hunter eye look. But without the slight positive canthal tilt, low set eyebrow and browbone, very deepset eyeball and straight eyebrows it just doesnt look like hunter eyes.
I was watching a video on Digital Foundery YT channel, and noticed that this guy's eye shape actually resembles a hunter eye shape. But because it has too much hooding from soft tissue, because the eyebrow and brow bone is high set, the eyes dont look liek hunter eyes, but more like soft baby eyes. His eyes are actually deep set as well, but the eyebrow and brow bone are too high set and because of that, his eyes dont look hunter-like.
Legit hunter eyes are like 1 out of several thousand ppl.


Funny enough, his browbone is low set and eyebrows are also low set. His eyeballs are also decently deep set AND he has slight positive canthal tilt. He also has decent hooding and very little upper eyelid exposure. Eyes are vertically not too long. All of those things are needed to have hunter yes.
YET his eye area still looks cucky and ZERO intimidating. It looks soylent and beta like. I guess his eyes are horizontally too short , I cant tell what exactly is making those eyes look zero like hunter and insanely cuck-ish.
Lets move to a different topic, the bluepilled normies, when they watch YT videos or Tik Toks about hunter eyes etc. assume that any eye area that has decent hooding is equal to hunter eyes. Thats insanely low IQ (not surprising).
They think eyes like these (which do have hooding) are hunter like:







I can see how it can be easily confused, because on those examples the dudes have little Upper Eyelid exposure and good hooding, but those are still not hunter eyes. For hunter eyes, the browbone and the actual eyebrow has to be giga low set. If browbone and eyebrow are too high, the eyes will look baby-like, even though the actual eye shape could work to create the hunter eye look. But without the slight positive canthal tilt, low set eyebrow and browbone, very deepset eyeball and straight eyebrows it just doesnt look like hunter eyes.
I was watching a video on Digital Foundery YT channel, and noticed that this guy's eye shape actually resembles a hunter eye shape. But because it has too much hooding from soft tissue, because the eyebrow and brow bone is high set, the eyes dont look liek hunter eyes, but more like soft baby eyes. His eyes are actually deep set as well, but the eyebrow and brow bone are too high set and because of that, his eyes dont look hunter-like.

Legit hunter eyes are like 1 out of several thousand ppl.
Last edited: