Liberal art degrees aren’t useless, most people pursuing them are just too ugly to succeed with them

[Prettyboy]

The older I get the more I realize how your looks & the needed amount of hard skills to succeed in the job market are inversely correlated.

Back when I was in highschool I used to stress so much about what degree to choose, calculating RoR etc. In retrospect it matters way less than I used to think, it’ll all about looks basically. You can succesful with even the easiest meme degrees with no pre-thought out carer path if you are attractive enough. While if are really unattractive you have to resort to tormenting yourself with STEM and rot away your youth while others are living the fun college experience.

If someone is only deeming degrees like comp sci useful, it’s a telltale sign they are too unattractive to succeed with “fun” degrees.

 

[manletmachinestream]

 

[RapeAllFemales]

Dnrd kys hungarian faggot

 

[MoggerGaston]

The older I get the more I realize how your looks & the needed amount of hard skills to succeed in the job market are inversely correlated.

Back when I was in highschool I used to stress so much about what degree to choose, calculating RoR etc. In retrospect it matters way less than I used to think, it’ll all about looks basically. You can succesful with even the easiest meme degrees with no pre-thought out carer path if you are attractive enough. While if are really unattractive you have to resort to tormenting yourself with STEM and rot away your youth while others are living the fun college experience.

If someone is only deeming degrees like comp sci useful, it’s a telltale sign they are too unattractive to succeed with “fun” degrees.

you didn't mention nepotism which is another massive factor in how privileged people get good jobs despite having shit degrees.

 

[Klasik616]

The older I get the more I realize how your looks & the needed amount of hard skills to succeed in the job market are inversely correlated.

Back when I was in highschool I used to stress so much about what degree to choose, calculating RoR etc. In retrospect it matters way less than I used to think, it’ll all about looks basically. You can succesful with even the easiest meme degrees with no pre-thought out carer path if you are attractive enough. While if are really unattractive you have to resort to tormenting yourself with STEM and rot away your youth while others are living the fun college experience.

If someone is only deeming degrees like comp sci useful, it’s a telltale sign they are too unattractive to succeed with “fun” degrees.

Succesful people in useless degrees are only 3/100, it's all a scam

 

[RapeAllFemales]

I will go to STEM and do the mog of anyone cause im full looksmaxing, those bluepill nerds will be fascinated by my presence and if I meet foid even if ltb i will make me suck my dick in the bathrooms of the school

 

[Prettyboy]

you didn't mention nepotism which is another massive factor in how privileged people get good jobs despite having shit degrees.

Nepotism + the insitution matters much more than the major itself. Anything, even the easiest degree from a target uni is better than a non-target one in the context of finance/consulting for example.

If someone has to resort studying something super heavy on hard skills, they are usually either or both lower class & ugly, trying to make ends meet while rotting their life away.

If someone is good looking & tall, it comes naturally they can make their way into management and chisel their people handling skills instead of having to constantly study hard skills.

 

[MoggerGaston]

Nepotism + the insitution matters much more than the major itself. Anything, even the easiest degree from a target uni is better than a non-target one in the context of finance/consulting for example.

If someone has to resort studying something super heavy on hard skills, they are usually either or both lower class & ugly, trying to make ends meet while rotting their life away.

If someone is good looking & tall, it comes naturally they can make their way into management and chisel their people handling skills instead of having to constantly study hard skills.

If you are ugly and/or low-class you should temper your expectations and be happy with less.
Recognize that you didn't get the privilege to succeed as easily as others instead of beating yourself up for it.

 

[Snicket]

The older I get the more I realize how your looks & the needed amount of hard skills to succeed in the job market are inversely correlated.

Back when I was in highschool I used to stress so much about what degree to choose, calculating RoR etc. In retrospect it matters way less than I used to think, it’ll all about looks basically. You can succesful with even the easiest meme degrees with no pre-thought out carer path if you are attractive enough. While if are really unattractive you have to resort to tormenting yourself with STEM and rot away your youth while others are living the fun college experience.

If someone is only deeming degrees like comp sci useful, it’s a telltale sign they are too unattractive to succeed with “fun” degrees.

IQ is the greatest predictor of earning capacity. Has a far stronger positive correlation than looks.

I’m sure lookism is real in the workplace but i don’t believe it’s sufficient go get a high earning job. Look at the top 10 richest men in the world. None of them are good looking.

 

[Klasik616]

If you are ugly and/or low-class you should temper your expectations and be happy with less.
Recognize that you didn't get the privilege to succeed as easily as others instead of beating yourself up for it.

Yes I would not hire a short shitskin subhuman if I were the boss

 

[MoggerGaston]

Yes I would not hire a short shitskin subhuman if I were the boss

neither would you want to date an ugly femcel.

It's simply hard to accept that people aren't born equal I guess, since society has this retarded notion of denying reality and wanting us to accept that ugly people have the same value as attractive people, rich same as poor, etc.

denial of reality is a retarded way to raise kids.

 

[Snicket]

Yes I would not hire a short shitskin subhuman if I were the boss

Sure you would if you could outsource and pay a fraction of the wage to keep costs down and stay competitive

 

[Klasik616]

Sure you would if you could outsource and pay a fraction of the wage to keep costs down to stay competitive

If my company is going to bankruptcy yes

 

[superpsycho]

IQ is the greatest predictor of earning capacity. Has a far stronger positive correlation than looks.

I’m sure lookism is real in the workplace but i don’t believe it’s sufficient go get a high earning job. Look at the richest men in the world. None of them are good looking.

being good looking won't necessarily hand you a good job, but it will definitely give u the edge over normies.

 

[Snicket]

If my company is going to bankruptcy yes

Silicon Valley uses the H1-B visa to flood the labor market with cheap Indian Labor. It is an economic calculation.

 

[Snicket]

being good looking won't necessarily hand you a good job, but it will definitely give u the edge over normies.

For high paying jobs, you have to do psychometric testing - glorified iq tests - behind a computer before you even get to interview. The advantages of lookism in work are real but overstated.

IQ >>>>Looks. From 120+, you can pursue any profession you want.

 

[Klasik616]

neither would you want to date an ugly femcel.

It's simply hard to accept that people aren't born equal I guess, since society has this retarded notion of denying reality and wanting us to accept that ugly people have the same value as attractive people, rich same as poor, etc.

denial of reality is a retarded way to raise kids.

I think we both rejected ugly femcels in the past.
Discrimination by looks is the oldest and most natural one, way before money or capitalists existed.

 

[Beastimmung]

All the high end jobs are easy as fuck, thats why you can do them with any degree, you just learn everything on the job extremly fast.

Soft skills (and that includes looks) are most of what matters cause in corporations 90% of jobs are bullshit jobs.

Even if you study engineering, at your job none of what you learned in university actually matters for your job.

University should be closed for the common people again, its a bloated institution with no value anymore.

 

[Prettyboy]

being good looking won't necessarily hand you a good job, but it will definitely give u the edge over normies.

I would argue that more often than not, intelligence and looks level go hand in hand. Exceptions do exist, but the correlation is pretty clear. People don’t usually know how many attractive celebrities have in fact very high intelligence as well. From Marilyn Monroe to Dolph Lundgren, there are numerous superstars that show just how much genes come in package.

 

[Snicket]

If my company is going to bankruptcy yes

Btw, Indian and Asian households across developed countries consistently earn a higher average wage than white households. It’s a statistical fact. If lookism really were as important as people claimed in the workplace, then this wouldn’t be borne out.

 

[William Anderson]

I

Nepotism + the insitution matters much more than the major itself. Anything, even the easiest degree from a target uni is better than a non-target one in the context of finance/consulting for example.

If someone has to resort studying something super heavy on hard skills, they are usually either or both lower class & ugly, trying to make ends meet while rotting their life away.

If someone is good looking & tall, it comes naturally they can make their way into management and chisel their people handling skills instead of having to constantly study hard skills.

It’s all about nepotism. Saying it’s all hard work is obviously cope but looks are cope too, it’s about connections not about leg length or jaw angle or grades

 

[Snicket]

I would argue that more often than not, intelligence and looks level go hand in hand. Exceptions do exist, but the correlation is pretty clear. People don’t usually know how many attractive celebrities have in fact very high intelligence as well. From Marilyn Monroe to Dolph Lundgren, there are numerous superstars that show just how much genes come in package.

Where are you getting this from? Is there any evidence of a positive correlation between IQ and attractiveness? Bar a few anecdotal examples.

 

[TiktokUser]

Where are you getting this from? Is there any evidence of a positive correlation between IQ and attractiveness? Bar a few anecdotal examples.

OP is just a fat retard who wants to blame his looks on everything like a scapegoat

 

[gymceltard]

Nepotism + the insitution matters much more than the major itself. Anything, even the easiest degree from a target uni is better than a non-target one in the context of finance/consulting for example.

If someone has to resort studying something super heavy on hard skills, they are usually either or both lower class & ugly, trying to make ends meet while rotting their life away.

If someone is good looking & tall, it comes naturally they can make their way into management and chisel their people handling skills instead of having to constantly study hard skills.

True but Chads usually do business degrees or finance and shit like that. You will never see a Chad get a liberal arts degree.

However you are correct that STEM is 100% for incel nerds. The sheer amount of studying and lab work you must suffer through even in intro biology, chemistry, physics, calculus is just suicide inducing

 

[superpsycho]

For high paying jobs, you have to do psychometric testing - glorified iq tests - behind a computer before you even get to interview. The advantages of lookism in work are real but overstated.

IQ >>>>Looks. From 120+, you can pursue any profession you want.

yea. tbh i dont think lookism when it comes to employment is that brutal because while it can help you get your name out there more easily, and it can possibly land you a job due to subconscious bias, it won't always help you keep it if you truly lack the skills required for it.

 

[superpsycho]

True but Chads usually do business degrees or finance and shit like that. You will never see a Chad get a liberal arts degree.

However you are correct that STEM is 100% for incel nerds. The sheer amount of studying and lab work you must suffer through even in intro biology, chemistry, physics, calculus is just suicide inducing

yea i cant be bothered to do that shit while everyone else is out having a good time and doing NT things tbh

 

[Prettyboy]

Where are you getting this from? Is there any evidence of a positive correlation between IQ and attractiveness? Bar a few anecdotal examples.

I think it’s observable on the grand, societal scale rather than on case by case basis. The strongest indicator of one’s social class is IQ, and it so happen that people tend to look shorter & less attractive the further down they are in the societal totem pole.

 

[Klasik616]

True but Chads usually do business degrees or finance and shit like that. You will never see a Chad get a liberal arts degree.

However you are correct that STEM is 100% for incel nerds. The sheer amount of studying and lab work you must suffer through even in intro biology, chemistry, physics, calculus is just suicide inducing

Brett Maverick studied history

 

[gymceltard]

yea i cant be bothered to do that shit while everyone else is out having a good time and doing NT things tbh

I know bro, that’s why I dropped out of premed. It was too much suffering to studying 5-8 hours of STEM bullshit everyday as a KHHV, all with the hopes of becoming a beta provider in five to ten years. No thanks, fuck that.

 

[Lookologist003]

There are people who go to school to get an education so they can get a job. Those going from HS to college aren't those people but they are going because of the social life they are promised there, like they think they will get to fuck women and drink and party. Lifemaxxing entails going to college for the second reason.

The strongest indicator of one’s social class is IQ

I don't think IQ is an indicator of anything. You can become part of the upper class just by being born into the right family. And looks are forever the limits of a man's social life.

IQ is useless because money is useless in achieving that lustful love and respect in society typical of a happy life.

 

[Snicket]

I think it’s observable on the grand, societal scale rather than on case by case basis.

I’ll take that as a no then. If you’re right, then why does the average Indian and Asian household earn far more than the average white household?

The strongest indicator of one’s social class is IQ, and it so happen that people tend to look shorter & less attractive the further down they are in the societal totem pole.

Again, any evidence that social class and looks are positively correlated? Behind extreme poverty, that is.

 

[Lookologist003]

yea. tbh i dont think lookism when it comes to employment is that brutal because while it can help you get your name out there more easily

You mustn't be a manlet.

Lookism is the reason that manlets struggle to land high paying deals, investments, be entrepreneurs. All it takes is the investor or other party, or employer to see the manlet and get cold feet because of the strong subliminal forces that are a man's looks.

 

[superpsycho]

I would argue that more often than not, intelligence and looks level go hand in hand. Exceptions do exist, but the correlation is pretty clear. People don’t usually know how many attractive celebrities have in fact very high intelligence as well. From Marilyn Monroe to Dolph Lundgren, there are numerous superstars that show just how much genes come in package.

Not a crazy take to say intelligence and looks are slightly correlated. Attractive people can get more educational opportunities and have social advantages that gives them more life experience during their formative years while their brain is still developing that can contribute to higher IQ when their brain is fully developed compared to an abused dog incel with no life experience. In the end, I think intelligence ultimately boils down to genes and environment.

I think Dolph Lundgren's case is truly an outlier though and a little extreme to prove a point with though.. He is easily the peak human, he was destined to win from the day he was conceived in his mom's womb, but I do see what you mean.

 

[MoggerGaston]

I think we both rejected ugly femcels in the past.
Discrimination by looks is the oldest and most natural one, way before money or capitalists existed.

what we gonna do with our lives now

 

[Prettyboy]

I think Dolph Lundgren's case is truly an outlier though and a little extreme to prove a point with though.. He is easily the peak human, he was destined to win from the day he was conceived in his mom's womb, but I do see what you mean.

He is indeed an Übermensch of some sort, but his case isn’t that uncommon among celebrities if you go down this rabbithole - attractive musicians, actors, media personalities very often have super high IQ. They are perhaps known for their looks but with their intelligence they could have pursued whatever else too and still succeed.

Just googled some examples, Natalie Portman went to Harvard, Jodie Foster to Yale, Emma Watson to Brown University.

My point is good genes congregate, Ivy League or Russell Group universities are filled to the brim with attractive & smart people, some of whom choose a career of publicity.

Likewise there are practically no attractive people on the other side of the spectrum at the bottom of society, among toilet cleaners, street sweepers, construction workers etc

 

[MoggerGaston]

I think it’s observable on the grand, societal scale rather than on case by case basis. The strongest indicator of one’s social class is IQ, and it so happen that people tend to look shorter & less attractive the further down they are in the societal totem pole.

I strongly disagree. I think IQ isn't correlated as much with status, success, looks, social-class, etc. as people have been led to believe.

Things like born-into looks, class, wealth are far stronger powers than IQ ever has been and ever will be.

 

[Prettyboy]

Again, any evidence that social class and looks are positively correlated? Behind extreme poverty, that is.

The degree of sclass segregation obviously varies by location, but in general the bigger the city, the more apparent just how much the average looks level of peeople you see in different neighborhoods varies with the area’s social class. Just by taking a stroll and looking at faces you can gauge whether you are in a poverty ridden, working class, gentrifying middle class or upper class part of the city.

 

[Snicket]

The degree of sclass segregation obviously varies by location, but in general the bigger the city, the more apparent just how much the average looks level of peeople you see in different neighborhoods varies with the area’s social class. Just by taking a stroll and looking at faces you can gauge whether you are in a poverty ridden, working class, gentrifying middle class or upper class part of the city.

This is all just anecdotal. At least I based my arguments on actual data. “Just strolling around” the streets isn’t a proper argument.