Limb lengthening is the best investment a guy can make

[puniteking]

Multiple studies suggest that height directly correlates with higher earnings, social status, and dating success. Here’s why investing in limb lengthening could yield the highest ROI (Return on Investment) for a man’s life:

(Each Inch ≈ $30K More Per Year)
So if a guy is 5’9 he would need to make an extra 90k per year to compete with a guy who’s 6’0 in the dating market

Taller men are perceived as more competent, authoritative, and leader like (stereotypes favor height in hiring/promotions).
High-paying fields (finance, tech, law)

6'0"+ men get 60% more matches than 5'9" men.
6'2" with shoes" puts you in the top 5% of male heights on apps.**

Psychology Studies:
Women subconsciously associate height with protection, status, and better genetics
Taller men are more likely to be approached, trusted, and respected in social settings.

So if I get tibia done in India for 18k with Dr Parihar (2.3 inches/6cm) I would go from 5’10.5 barefoot to 6’1 and easily 6’2 with shoes on tell me why this wouldn’t be the best investment of my life

@666PSL
@afroheadluke
@GeThinnerLookBetter
@Gmogger
@h111
@latetothegame
@Piratecel
@Rea
@secret.acender
@wishIwasSalludon

 

[Sprinkles]

 

[ryuken]

 

[puniteking]

I’ll be walking in 6-8 months and can do sports like running within 12

 

[Foreverbrad]

So since I’m already 6’2” why do I only make 40k a year?
These stats are trash.

 

[puniteking]

So since I’m already 6’2” why do I only make 40k a year?
These stats are trash.

 

[Arthur the Egyptian]

Do it in first world country I recommend Germany any other countries would be worst choice

 

[cucklek]

Do it in first world country I recommend Germany any other countries would be worst choice

its probabyl like 100k in germany

 

[Snicket]

Multiple studies suggest that height directly correlates with higher earnings, social status, and dating success. Here’s why investing in limb lengthening could yield the highest ROI (Return on Investment) for a man’s life:

(Each Inch ≈ $30K More Per Year)
So if a guy is 5’9 he would need to make an extra 90k per year to compete with a guy who’s 6’0 in the dating market

Taller men are perceived as more competent, authoritative, and leader like (stereotypes favor height in hiring/promotions).
High-paying fields (finance, tech, law)

6'0"+ men get 60% more matches than 5'9" men.
6'2" with shoes" puts you in the top 5% of male heights on apps.**

Psychology Studies:
Women subconsciously associate height with protection, status, and better genetics
Taller men are more likely to be approached, trusted, and respected in social settings.

So if I get tibia done in India for 18k with Dr Parihar (2.3 inches/6cm) I would go from 5’10.5 barefoot to 6’1 and easily 6’2 with shoes on tell me why this wouldn’t be the best investment of my life

@666PSL
@afroheadluke
@GeThinnerLookBetter
@Gmogger
@h111
@latetothegame
@Piratecel
@Rea
@secret.acender
@wishIwasSalludon

We know being taller is better. Shock revelation.
But whether it's worth risking your mobility for is another question.

 

[Arthur the Egyptian]

its probabyl like 100k in germany

Less like 50k for 7cm
Worth it at least you can run after surgery

 

[puniteking]

We know being taller is better. Shock revelation.
But whether it's worth risking your mobility for is another question.

There’s no risk unless you go to Türkiye where they butcher people also this procedure wouldn’t exist if it was so dangerous it’s FDA approved also

 

[Snicket]

There’s no risk unless you go to Türkiye where they butcher people also this procedure wouldn’t exist if it was so dangerous it’s FDA approved also

The risk is much lower but you still run the risk of bone-unions and assuming everthing does go as planned, 2 years of intensive physio-theraphy to restore your mobility.

Paley charges 200K+ for 4 inches.

 

[puniteking]

The risk is much lower but you still run the risk of bone-unions and assuming everthing does go as planned, 2 years of intensive physio-theraphy to restore your mobility.

Paley charges 200K+ for 4 inches.

Dr parihar was trained by Paley also parihar doesn’t do femur he only does tibia since it’s the safest and less complications with the LON method

 

[Snicket]

Dr parihar was trained by Paley also parihar doesn’t do femur he only does tibia since it’s the safest and less complications with the LON method

I never thought I'd have Alvin the Chipmunk extolling the virtues of limb lengthening to me.

 

[neo330]

Multiple studies suggest that height directly correlates with higher earnings, social status, and dating success. Here’s why investing in limb lengthening could yield the highest ROI (Return on Investment) for a man’s life:

(Each Inch ≈ $30K More Per Year)
So if a guy is 5’9 he would need to make an extra 90k per year to compete with a guy who’s 6’0 in the dating market

Taller men are perceived as more competent, authoritative, and leader like (stereotypes favor height in hiring/promotions).
High-paying fields (finance, tech, law)

6'0"+ men get 60% more matches than 5'9" men.
6'2" with shoes" puts you in the top 5% of male heights on apps.**

Psychology Studies:
Women subconsciously associate height with protection, status, and better genetics
Taller men are more likely to be approached, trusted, and respected in social settings.

So if I get tibia done in India for 18k with Dr Parihar (2.3 inches/6cm) I would go from 5’10.5 barefoot to 6’1 and easily 6’2 with shoes on tell me why this wouldn’t be the best investment of my life

@666PSL
@afroheadluke
@GeThinnerLookBetter
@Gmogger
@h111
@latetothegame
@Piratecel
@Rea
@secret.acender
@wishIwasSalludon

It definitely could be worth it, but only do it if you have the money to do so, and lengthen as much as your wingspan can take without getting offset. For example if a 5’ 7 guy has a 5’ 10 wingspan, he should only shoot for like 2-2.5 inches in height gain so the height doesnt exceed to the wingspan. Also this might be a controversial take, but proportions matter far more than the lengthening itself. I’d much rather spend the extra money doing quatrilateral lengthening on all four leg segments (both femurs and both tibias, 1.2 inches in each femur and 1 inch in each tibia for example) to stay as well proportioned as possible. Break the surgery up into two parts if they dont allow quadrilateral all at once due to complication risks or whatever. I would rather be well proportioned throughout my legs and only lengthen slightly above 2 inches in height than overlengthen just my femurs and tibia and have horrible proportions. Also dont lengthen more than 3 inches, every inch is a much greater risk and a longer recovery. Less is more in this case lengthening wise. Proportions and safety is law.

 

[IHATEINDIANS]

Why would you risk death or permanent crippling at average height? Pure retardation. If being tall matters that much to you then just geomaxx. I'd rather live in a shithole than risk literal death over a few inches. Save all that money for facial surgery if you're above 5'5.

 

[Foreverbrad]

It definitely could be worth it, but only do it if you have the money to do so, and lengthen as much as your wingspan can take without getting offset. For example if a 5’ 7 guy has a 5’ 10 wingspan, he should only shoot for like 2-2.5 inches in height gain so the height doesnt exceed to the wingspan. Also this might be a controversial take, but proportions matter far more than the lengthening itself. I’d much rather spend the extra money doing quatrilateral lengthening on all four leg segments (both femurs and both tibias, 1.2 inches in each femur and 1 inch in each tibia for example) to stay as well proportioned as possible. Break the surgery up into two parts if they dont allow quadrilateral all at once due to complication risks or whatever. I would rather be well proportioned throughout my legs and only lengthen slightly above 2 inches in height than overlengthen just my femurs and tibia and have horrible proportions. Also dont lengthen more than 3 inches, every inch is a much greater risk and a longer recovery. Less is more in this case lengthening wise. Proportions and safety is law.

I remember seeing a study where the limb proportions did not matter at all in female judged attractiveness. Nor did wingspan within reason. The main thing to watch out for is leg to torso ratio.

 

[neo330]

I remember seeing a study where the limb proportions did not matter at all in female judged attractiveness. Nor did wingspan within reason. The main thing to watch out for is leg to torso ratio.

Ur right, it doesnt matter much for attractiveness, but if you play any high intensity sports, natural leg proportions would definitely give the edge. Also I wouldnt want shorts to look super weird on my legs, much rather break the surgery into two parts if necessary. Could just be a personal preference but thats how id do it.