Literature authored by women is a glimpse into female psychology

sexy

sexy

female gaze is law
Joined
Aug 1, 2024
Posts
1,578
Reputation
3,920
I have been interested in the psychology behind mating for a long time.

I believe that, just like in males, there is a profound conflict between the female rational brain (neocortex and superego) and the primitive brain (limbic system and ego).

The rational brain is what encourages a woman to favor well-adjusted, good men who treat her nicely, but the primitive brain is what drives her to seek a physically attractive man who is so assertive as to treat her badly; the bad boy sex appeal phenomenon.

Books written by women are proof of this. You can see this is an evolutionary preference rather than a culturally relative one because even in times when marriages were semi-arranged, inter-familial financial agreements, this literary trope still lurked visibly beneath the surface despite a strong moral incentive of the author to suppress it due to societal pressures present at the time of writing.

If you read Wuthering Heights or Pride and Prejudice, both written almost 200 years ago, you can still see the archetype of the emotionally detached and socially aloof, physically attractive man enrolled as the leading heartthrob.

It is almost as if having an unmoving rock of smouldering discontent is what draws women in, rather than an intimate and emotionally symbiotic relationship like that which is professed to be the societal ideal by men and women alike.

Take a look at media designed to encapsulate generic male fantasy and you will see the same: dominance is key to romantic fantasy. I find it to be a failure of both male and female psychology that power structures are so quintessentially innate to romantic relationships. Human biology undermines the contrived narrative of self-sacrificial agape love which pretty much all humans have collectively bought into.


@descension
@Darkeningstar
@cromagnon
@TheLastLaugh
 
  • +1
  • JFL
  • Woah
Reactions: gentilegoy, Deleted member 91529, GigaAryenMaxxer and 30 others
Bump
 
  • Love it
  • +1
Reactions: descension, twojei and sexy
I have been interested in the psychology behind mating for a long time.

I believe that, just like in males, there is a profound conflict between the female rational brain (neocortex and superego) and the primitive brain (limbic system and ego).

The rational brain is what encourages a woman to favor well-adjusted, good men who treat her nicely, but the primitive brain is what drives her to seek a physically attractive man who is so assertive as to treat her badly; the bad boy sex appeal phenomenon.

Books written by women are proof of this. You can see this is an evolutionary preference rather than a culturally relative one because even in times when marriages were semi-arranged, inter-familial financial agreements, this literary trope still lurked visibly beneath the surface despite a strong moral incentive of the author to suppress it due to societal pressures present at the time of writing.

If you read Wuthering Heights or Pride and Prejudice, both written almost 200 years ago, you can still see the archetype of the emotionally detached and socially aloof, physically attractive man enrolled as the leading heartthrob.

It is almost as if having an unmoving rock of smouldering discontent is what draws women in, rather than an intimate and emotionally symbiotic relationship like that which is professed to be the societal ideal by men and women alike.

Take a look at media designed to encapsulate generic male fantasy and you will see the same: dominance is key to romantic fantasy. I find it to be a failure of both male and female psychology that power structures are so quintessentially innate to romantic relationships. Human biology undermines the contrived narrative of self-sacrificial agape love which pretty much all humans have collectively bought into.


@descension
@Darkeningstar
@cromagnon
@TheLastLaugh
Interesting. Do you recommend any books that delve deep about this topic?
 
  • +1
Reactions: sexy
I have been interested in the psychology behind mating for a long time.

I believe that, just like in males, there is a profound conflict between the female rational brain (neocortex and superego) and the primitive brain (limbic system and ego).

The rational brain is what encourages a woman to favor well-adjusted, good men who treat her nicely, but the primitive brain is what drives her to seek a physically attractive man who is so assertive as to treat her badly; the bad boy sex appeal phenomenon.

Books written by women are proof of this. You can see this is an evolutionary preference rather than a culturally relative one because even in times when marriages were semi-arranged, inter-familial financial agreements, this literary trope still lurked visibly beneath the surface despite a strong moral incentive of the author to suppress it due to societal pressures present at the time of writing.

If you read Wuthering Heights or Pride and Prejudice, both written almost 200 years ago, you can still see the archetype of the emotionally detached and socially aloof, physically attractive man enrolled as the leading heartthrob.

It is almost as if having an unmoving rock of smouldering discontent is what draws women in, rather than an intimate and emotionally symbiotic relationship like that which is professed to be the societal ideal by men and women alike.

Take a look at media designed to encapsulate generic male fantasy and you will see the same: dominance is key to romantic fantasy. I find it to be a failure of both male and female psychology that power structures are so quintessentially innate to romantic relationships. Human biology undermines the contrived narrative of self-sacrificial agape love which pretty much all humans have collectively bought into.


@descension
@Darkeningstar
@cromagnon
@TheLastLaugh
high iq thread, mirin effort
 
  • +1
Reactions: HighLtn and sexy
  • +1
  • Love it
  • Hmm...
Reactions: gentilegoy, illusivespirits, Deleted member 91529 and 21 others
I find it to be a failure of both male and female psychology that power structures are so quintessentially innate to romantic relationships.
What you mean here is that there are always power imbalances in relationships? For example when a Stacy gets with an oofy-doffy?

And thus, the reason why that constitutes a failure is because there is no such a thing as a 'simbyotic relationship' which would be considered as the highest degree of quality a relationship can reach under rational terms of course, and so it is the one that benefits society the most.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: sexy
What you mean here is that there are always power imbalances in relationships? For example when a Stacy gets with an oofy-doffy?
I meant that women and men are expected to have relationships based on romance and reciprocity when in reality what both genders desire are not so compatible with those ideas. Women often go after jerks who mistreat them because they enjoy living on the adrenaline, while men want to dominate women because they feel powerful in doing so. None of this is acceptable by the standards of a conservative society, but it still reflects the desires of both genders.
 
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: gentilegoy, illusivespirits, Deleted member 91529 and 22 others
I have been interested in the psychology behind mating for a long time.

I believe that, just like in males, there is a profound conflict between the female rational brain (neocortex and superego) and the primitive brain (limbic system and ego).

The rational brain is what encourages a woman to favor well-adjusted, good men who treat her nicely, but the primitive brain is what drives her to seek a physically attractive man who is so assertive as to treat her badly; the bad boy sex appeal phenomenon.

Books written by women are proof of this. You can see this is an evolutionary preference rather than a culturally relative one because even in times when marriages were semi-arranged, inter-familial financial agreements, this literary trope still lurked visibly beneath the surface despite a strong moral incentive of the author to suppress it due to societal pressures present at the time of writing.

If you read Wuthering Heights or Pride and Prejudice, both written almost 200 years ago, you can still see the archetype of the emotionally detached and socially aloof, physically attractive man enrolled as the leading heartthrob.

It is almost as if having an unmoving rock of smouldering discontent is what draws women in, rather than an intimate and emotionally symbiotic relationship like that which is professed to be the societal ideal by men and women alike.

Take a look at media designed to encapsulate generic male fantasy and you will see the same: dominance is key to romantic fantasy. I find it to be a failure of both male and female psychology that power structures are so quintessentially innate to romantic relationships. Human biology undermines the contrived narrative of self-sacrificial agape love which pretty much all humans have collectively bought into.


@descension
@Darkeningstar
@cromagnon
@TheLastLaugh

I'm so starved for long and semierudite threads

I miss high effort users and high effort threads

Reading this was nice

Good job OP but KYS if you GPTed this
 
  • +1
Reactions: sexy

Similar threads

Nazi Germany
Replies
25
Views
359
Nazi Germany
Nazi Germany
Zenis
Replies
87
Views
10K
crushing sluts@100%
crushing sluts@100%
BucketCrab
Replies
69
Views
10K
nordic_ascender
N
chief detectiveman
Replies
12
Views
6K
slavicpsycho
slavicpsycho

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top