eduardkoopman
Kraken
- Joined
- Aug 29, 2019
- Posts
- 22,662
- Reputation
- 28,426
For children they found: comparing attractive looking children with UNattractive looking children.
Attractive children behaved more positively and possessed more positive traits than unattractive children (overall d+ = .408; 60% vs. 40%).
Compared with unattractive children, attractive children were more popular (d+ = .77; 68% vs. 32%),
better adjusted (d÷ = .32; 58% vs. 42%),
and display greater intelligence/performance competence (at÷ = .399; 60% vs. 40%). No moderator variables were significant.
For adults they found: comparing attractive looking adults with UNattractive looking adults.
Results for adults paralleled those for children (overall d+ = .40; 60% vs. 40%).
Compared with unattractive adults, attractive adults experienced much more occupational success (d÷ = .76; 68% vs. 32%),
were liked more as indicated by the subcategory of popularity (d÷ = .65; 65% vs. 35%),
and had more dating experience (d÷ = .55; 63% vs. 37%),
more sexual experience (d÷ = .31; 58% vs. 42%),
and better physical health (d÷ = .39; 59% vs. 41%).
In addition, attractive adults were somewhat more extraverted (d÷ = .26; 56% vs. 44%),
had somewhat more traditional attitudes (d÷ = .27; 57% vs. 43%),
were somewhat higher in self-confidence/self-esteem (d÷ = .24; 56% vs. 44%),
possessed somewhat better social skills (d+ = .20; 55% vs. 45%),
had slightly better mental health (d÷ = .16; 54% vs. 46%),
and were very slightly more intelligent (d÷ = .07; 52% vs. 48%
Water, wet.
sauce: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10825783/
sauce full paper: http://jonathanstray.com/papers/Langlois.pdf
Attractive children behaved more positively and possessed more positive traits than unattractive children (overall d+ = .408; 60% vs. 40%).
Compared with unattractive children, attractive children were more popular (d+ = .77; 68% vs. 32%),
better adjusted (d÷ = .32; 58% vs. 42%),
and display greater intelligence/performance competence (at÷ = .399; 60% vs. 40%). No moderator variables were significant.
For adults they found: comparing attractive looking adults with UNattractive looking adults.
Results for adults paralleled those for children (overall d+ = .40; 60% vs. 40%).
Compared with unattractive adults, attractive adults experienced much more occupational success (d÷ = .76; 68% vs. 32%),
were liked more as indicated by the subcategory of popularity (d÷ = .65; 65% vs. 35%),
and had more dating experience (d÷ = .55; 63% vs. 37%),
more sexual experience (d÷ = .31; 58% vs. 42%),
and better physical health (d÷ = .39; 59% vs. 41%).
In addition, attractive adults were somewhat more extraverted (d÷ = .26; 56% vs. 44%),
had somewhat more traditional attitudes (d÷ = .27; 57% vs. 43%),
were somewhat higher in self-confidence/self-esteem (d÷ = .24; 56% vs. 44%),
possessed somewhat better social skills (d+ = .20; 55% vs. 45%),
had slightly better mental health (d÷ = .16; 54% vs. 46%),
and were very slightly more intelligent (d÷ = .07; 52% vs. 48%
Water, wet.
sauce: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10825783/
sauce full paper: http://jonathanstray.com/papers/Langlois.pdf
