Lookism discrimination should be taken more seriously

D

Deleted member 10104

Fuchsia
Joined
Oct 7, 2020
Posts
14,554
Reputation
30,531
Why isn't lookism and looks discrimination cared about as much as racism?

People just ignore it when it's so blatantly obvious. But no one will virtue signal about looks, just muh race muh sexuality muh gender.

Someone explain.
 
  • +1
Reactions: ProAcktiv, Deleted member 8765, johncruz12345 and 3 others
Because there is only discrimination against lookism for men,
Most people are average, and they cope personality and money
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 9837, Deleted member 8765, JustBeCurry and 5 others
Because foids get away with anything
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 8765, Deleted member 10104, Deleted member 5746 and 1 other person
Because lookism affects mostly white males (incels) who are also targeted by the same media that pushes the anti racism and anti sexism narrative. Why would the media defend the same group it's working so hard to shit on
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 8765, Deleted member 5349, Deleted member 10104 and 1 other person
mirin all these high iq responses tbh ngl
 
mirin all these high iq responses tbh ngl

Not at all.

The first true reason is due to lookism being less "categorizable" than gender or racial discrimination. You're either black or mulatto or white or man or woman. For looks theres much more grey area. You can have official identification saying your race or gender yet no "ugly" or "handsome" despite these being able to be obvious. Also theres a certain room for subjectivity when it comes to looks while theres not subjectivity when telling someones race or gender or sexuality. Tell several people to divide people in groups by race or gender, and the results will differ much less between the people who grouped them, than if you tell them to separate people into "ugly" and "good looking" group. While most of beauty is actually objective, theres a degree of subjectivity and grey area that there is not for the other subjects of discrmination. This is a reason why society doesn't seem to value it as much because of the increased "difficulty" to systematically discern members of a group.

The other reason is that lookism is the only type of discrimination that usually doesn't have an agenda behind it. It's a pure natural instinct that doesn't care about culture or ulterior motives. When any kind of discrimination has a certain agenda behind it, it's easier to out it as "discrimination" and turn people's attention to it, because of the association with said agenda and time of history values. Discrimination of blacks was associated with greedy money hungry bastards and with the time of slavery. Discrimination of women was associated with backwards stupid religious nuts and times of patriarchy. Discrimination of homosexual was associated with fanatic right wing idiots and the end of repression of the "atypical" sexual orientation. Discrimination of ugly people cannot be associated with any ulterior motive, excuse, culture, agenda, religious belief, gender, sexual orientation or time in history: it just is, and thats why also theres no "good vs bad guys" mentality that helps people root for the discriminated side when being exposed to it. For blacks it was "good guys blacks vs bad guys enslavers". For jews it was "good guys jews vs bad guys nazis". For women it was "good guys women vs bad guys patriarchs". But for ugly people there are not "sides", no culture, no story behind it, no "factions", no versus. It isn't similar at all to any other of the discriminations that happened within humanity, and it's completely unlinked to it's culture or environment: it's primal, subconscious. This other reason, like the lack of ability to classify as easily, is why lookism isn't taken as a serious -ism: lack of a clear objective or ideology to root for.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: the next o'pry, Jamal2222, Deleted member 9837 and 2 others
Lol at the soys thinking it’s racism. Tyrone doesn’t face any discrimination in his daily life, except maybe foids constantly harassing him for his cock

8422246E 785F 41E1 AC2F 07BBB6CC7230
 
  • +1
Reactions: Jamal2222 and Deleted member 8765
this would prove the blackpill to normies which isnt going to happen without societal collapse
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 8765
this would prove the blackpill to normies which isnt going to happen without societal collapse
Which is why we enjoy the collapse, like clowns warning the theater that it’s on fire only to be laughed at.
 
  • +1
Reactions: JustBeCurry and Deleted member 10104

Similar threads

J
Replies
6
Views
279
alpomer7
alpomer7
nestivv
Replies
22
Views
450
xzylecrey
xzylecrey
PsychoDsk
Replies
39
Views
657
User28823
User28823

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top