Looks AREN’T Objective: Eugenicist Nonsense Debunked

[SidharthTheSlayer]

I don’t understand how people don’t see that looks aren’t objective. All you need to do is go outside and see all these nichemaxxed subhumans with girlfriends. Women aren’t nazi eugenicists lmfao

The proof: Blacks and East Asians are “objectively” the ugliest races. Most blacks are recessed with dogshit coloring and bug eyes. East Asians are literally mongoloids. Yet BBCmaxxed and Kpopmaxxed dudes can still get white girls as well as girls of their own race because of nichemaxxing.

What a woman finds attractive is based on cultural factors, then biological reasons. After all, we aren’t living in an age of natural selection, but sexual selection. Both BBC and Kpop are heavily pushed in the western media, so some women, all of which are natural hyperconformists, go with the trend, develop preferences based on their experiences and relationship to media, and subconsciously perceive them as higher value than men of other archetypes.

The same thing happened on a much larger scale with men’s taste in women in the early 2000s. Appealing to the male gaze in the mainstream was being skinny and fit more than being thick and curvy. We saw the trend revert back to thick girls again in the 2010s.

What looks good isn’t timeless or objective, it’s set by cultural factors. Your goal in looksmaxxing should be to figure out your cultural archetype and strategy based on your genetics, desires, and location. If you‘re smart about it, you likely won’t even need to get surgery to slay. Change your style before considering Lefort 3.

 

[vinn98]

It's called betabux strategy, those guys are paying a lot for it trust me.

 

[Sexually Disabled]

I don’t understand how people don’t see that looks aren’t objective. All you need to do is go outside and see all these nichemaxxed subhumans with girlfriends. Women aren’t nazi eugenicists lmfao

The proof: Blacks and East Asians are “objectively” the ugliest races. Most blacks are recessed with dogshit coloring and bug eyes. East Asians are literally mongoloids. Yet BBCmaxxed and Kpopmaxxed dudes can still get white girls as well as girls of their own race because of nichemaxxing.

What a woman finds attractive is based on cultural factors, then biological reasons. After all, we aren’t living in an age of natural selection, but sexual selection. Both BBC and Kpop are heavily pushed in the western media, so some women, all of which are natural hyperconformists, go with the trend, develop preferences based on their experiences and relationship to media, and subconsciously perceive them as higher value than men of other archetypes.

The same thing happened on a much larger scale with men’s taste in women in the early 2000s. Appealing to the male gaze in the mainstream was being skinny and fit more than being thick and curvy. We saw the trend revert back to thick girls again in the 2010s.

What looks good isn’t timeless or objective, it’s set by cultural factors. Your goal in looksmaxxing should be to figure out your cultural archetype and strategy based on your genetics, desires, and location. If you‘re smart about it, you likely won’t even need to get surgery to slay. Change your style before considering Lefort 3.

I'm currently researching the replication crisis in psychology and it seems to BTFO the black pill.

 

[SidharthTheSlayer]

I'm currently researching the replication crisis in psychology and it seems to BTFO the black pill.

We really need to question the blackpill more and modify it. Obviously lookism prevails but the old ideas of what’s attractive feel like they were designed by a group of saggy old men

 

[Patient A]

The Jews created a society that favours dysgenics

 

[Whatever0]

Blacks aren't recessed at all.
Average African woman:

 

[Gus17]

dnr greycel

 

[rubberduck]

Objective = algorithm based on the sum of societies subjective opinions

There's basically an objective number society as a whole would give you, and then peoples subjective preferences can raise or lower it by up to a few points. For example I have a very strong preference for Latinas, I find a 6/10 Latina more attractive than an 9/10 blonde. But I can still recognize objectively that one is a 6 and the other is an 9, even if I subjectively am more attracted to the 6 in that case

 

[RandomGREY]

The proof: Blacks and East Asians are “objectively” the ugliest races. Most blacks are recessed with dogshit coloring and bug eyes. East Asians are literally mongoloids. Yet BBCmaxxed and Kpopmaxxed dudes can still get white girls as well as girls of their own race because of nichemaxxing.

say ur indian w/out saying ur indian jfl

 

[SidharthTheSlayer]

The Jews created a society that favours dysgenics

Shhhh, you’re saying the quiet part out loud

 

[Patient A]

Shhhh, you’re saying the quiet part out loud

 

[BucketCrab]

Two weak points in your stance.

• Looks are not 100% subjective, nor are they 100% objective: it's a mixture of both, it's just that the objective part is extremely difficult to quantify when we're dealing with minute differences. If there were no subjective component to beauty, you'd get conflicting results if you asked random people who looks better between these two, but in reality everyone knows which man looks best. And no, it's not about SOCIETY DICTATING STANDARDS, because human evolutionary instinct came millennia before society and you cannot really socially engineer attraction (look at how hard people are pushing "healthy at every size"... that doesn't make you like fat girls though, does it?)

• Nichemaxxing works but Niches still work within the realm of biological attractiveness. If a girl likes Niche X, a 4/10 that perfectly fits Niche X won't be more attractive to her than a 8/10 that doesn't fit it. Moreover, between guys that fit Niche X, standard looks theory still applies. Just because a girl likes eboys it doesn't mean all eboys are roughly the same in her eyes. She just likes a different variety of Chad compared to other girls who may prefer yet another variety. But rest assured, they all like Chad regardless of what his Niche is - they'll just prefer another type of Chad if given the choice.

 

[SidharthTheSlayer]

human evolutionary instinct came millennia before society and you cannot really socially engineer attraction

I appreciate your High IQ and effort in your response. But you're missing that women's human evolutionary instinct wasn't based on attractiveness, it was about natural selection. We are not practicing natural selection, we are practicing sexual selection. Women don't need ogres, they need Chads because Chads sperm is valuable for good offspring. Further, I would argue that the ideas of biological standards for beauty are societal and cultural constructs in and of themselves.

 

[BucketCrab]

I appreciate your High IQ and effort in your response. But you're missing that women's human evolutionary instinct wasn't based on attractiveness, it was about natural selection. We are not practicing natural selection, we are practicing sexual selection. Women don't need ogres, they need Chads because Chads sperm is valuable for good offspring.

Attractiveness is nothing more than the way we refer to the potential quality of a certain specimen's offspring.
Natural selection and sexual selection are one and the same - women don't select ogres because they're not ideal for human survival. They select Chads because their offspring is valuable evolutionarily speaking, and they reject other males because their offspring is less valuable: sexual selection is a means to enact natural selection. The fit survive, the unfit die.

Further, I would argue that the ideas of biological standards for beauty are societal and cultural constructs in and of themselves.

You have a point here but that type of circular discourse is quite pointless. Yes, we don't have a 100% sure way of knowing, the best we can do is guess with the (arguably) certain information we do have.

 

[Abhorrence]

Attractiveness is nothing more than the way we refer to the potential quality of a certain specimen's offspring.
Natural selection and sexual selection are one and the same - women don't select ogres because they're not ideal for human survival. They select Chads because their offspring is valuable evolutionarily speaking, and they reject other males because their offspring is less valuable: sexual selection is a means to enact natural selection. The fit survive, the unfit die.


You have a point here but that type of circular discourse is quite pointless. Yes, we don't have a 100% sure way of knowing, the best we can do is guess with the (arguably) certain information we do have.

nah sexual selection is not 100% one with natural selection or even close to it

its kinda random but not fully

 

[Deleted member 27511]

I don’t understand how people don’t see that looks aren’t objective. All you need to do is go outside and see all these nichemaxxed subhumans with girlfriends. Women aren’t nazi eugenicists lmfao

The proof: Blacks and East Asians are “objectively” the ugliest races. Most blacks are recessed with dogshit coloring and bug eyes. East Asians are literally mongoloids. Yet BBCmaxxed and Kpopmaxxed dudes can still get white girls as well as girls of their own race because of nichemaxxing.

What a woman finds attractive is based on cultural factors, then biological reasons. After all, we aren’t living in an age of natural selection, but sexual selection. Both BBC and Kpop are heavily pushed in the western media, so some women, all of which are natural hyperconformists, go with the trend, develop preferences based on their experiences and relationship to media, and subconsciously perceive them as higher value than men of other archetypes.

The same thing happened on a much larger scale with men’s taste in women in the early 2000s. Appealing to the male gaze in the mainstream was being skinny and fit more than being thick and curvy. We saw the trend revert back to thick girls again in the 2010s.

What looks good isn’t timeless or objective, it’s set by cultural factors. Your goal in looksmaxxing should be to figure out your cultural archetype and strategy based on your genetics, desires, and location. If you‘re smart about it, you likely won’t even need to get surgery to slay. Change your style before considering Lefort 3.

they are objective

 

[Deleted member 27511]

BBCmaxxed and Kpopmaxxed

both of those are complete memes that dont work

 

[humanoidsub7]

Women aren’t nazi eugenicists lmfao

Except they are

 

[Foreverbrad]

Fine if you’re black or Korean.
If you’re white it’s just about having the closest to conventional chad features while fighting a massive media failo.

 

[exo]

What a woman finds attractive is based on cultural factors

very true

you cant get the subhumans here to agree on what is a stacy and its the same thing for females rating men

 

[Mastermind]

you cant get the subhumans here to agree on what is a stacy and its the same thing for females rating men

Cope
The difference between HTB and Stacy is subjective taste
The difference between HTB and anything below that is pure objective quantifiable looks

There are physical traits that in people who are considered universally attractive are way too over-represented for some graycel to come and say looks aren't objective

 

[copeistani]

I don’t understand how people don’t see that looks aren’t objective. All you need to do is go outside and see all these nichemaxxed subhumans with girlfriends. Women aren’t nazi eugenicists lmfao

The proof: Blacks and East Asians are “objectively” the ugliest races. Most blacks are recessed with dogshit coloring and bug eyes. East Asians are literally mongoloids. Yet BBCmaxxed and Kpopmaxxed dudes can still get white girls as well as girls of their own race because of nichemaxxing.

What a woman finds attractive is based on cultural factors, then biological reasons. After all, we aren’t living in an age of natural selection, but sexual selection. Both BBC and Kpop are heavily pushed in the western media, so some women, all of which are natural hyperconformists, go with the trend, develop preferences based on their experiences and relationship to media, and subconsciously perceive them as higher value than men of other archetypes.

The same thing happened on a much larger scale with men’s taste in women in the early 2000s. Appealing to the male gaze in the mainstream was being skinny and fit more than being thick and curvy. We saw the trend revert back to thick girls again in the 2010s.

What looks good isn’t timeless or objective, it’s set by cultural factors. Your goal in looksmaxxing should be to figure out your cultural archetype and strategy based on your genetics, desires, and location. If you‘re smart about it, you likely won’t even need to get surgery to slay. Change your style before considering Lefort 3.

Not many words read. No source, just your normal platitudes I’m assuming. Get off this forum.​

 

[exo]

Cope
The difference between HTB and Stacy is subjective taste
The difference between HTB and anything below that is pure objective quantifiable looks

There are physical traits that in people who are considered universally attractive are way too over-represented for some graycel to come and say looks aren't objective

Cope, you have retards here calling bug-eyed jawless subhumans stacies (who are not even MTBs)

It's easier for females to be attractive though

 

[Mastermind]

Cope, you have retards here calling bug-eyed jawless subhumans stacies (who are not even MTBs)

It's easier for females to be attractive though

Closet pedophiles attracted by neoteny
Wanna bet they still have good soft features?

 

[reptiles]

I don’t understand how people don’t see that looks aren’t objective. All you need to do is go outside and see all these nichemaxxed subhumans with girlfriends. Women aren’t nazi eugenicists lmfao

The proof: Blacks and East Asians are “objectively” the ugliest races. Most blacks are recessed with dogshit coloring and bug eyes. East Asians are literally mongoloids. Yet BBCmaxxed and Kpopmaxxed dudes can still get white girls as well as girls of their own race because of nichemaxxing.

What a woman finds attractive is based on cultural factors, then biological reasons. After all, we aren’t living in an age of natural selection, but sexual selection. Both BBC and Kpop are heavily pushed in the western media, so some women, all of which are natural hyperconformists, go with the trend, develop preferences based on their experiences and relationship to media, and subconsciously perceive them as higher value than men of other archetypes.

The same thing happened on a much larger scale with men’s taste in women in the early 2000s. Appealing to the male gaze in the mainstream was being skinny and fit more than being thick and curvy. We saw the trend revert back to thick girls again in the 2010s.

What looks good isn’t timeless or objective, it’s set by cultural factors. Your goal in looksmaxxing should be to figure out your cultural archetype and strategy based on your genetics, desires, and location. If you‘re smart about it, you likely won’t even need to get surgery to slay. Change your style before considering Lefort 3.

What kinda of a retarded thread is this looks aren't objective?

 

[reptiles]

Closet pedophiles attracted by neoteny
Wanna bet they still have good soft features?

Nah neotany just means you look younger for life even east Asians in there 40s look like there in there 20s it's 1 of there positive traifs

 

[thecel]

Cope. Objective attractiveness is a statement about averages. Chad is objectively more attractive than Eugene because Chad attracts the opposite sex to a greater extent than Melvin does. This is an objective claim.

Analogy: Is the statement “mangoes are tastier than sardines” objective or subjective? It’s objective. It’s a statement that the human population on average prefers one food to another. It claims that one food produces a certain signal (interpreted the by brain as “tastes good”) to human brains more so than another food does.

Facts about opinions are facts.

 

[Mastermind]

Nah neotany just means you look younger for life even east Asians in there 40s look like there in there 20s it's 1 of there positive traifs

It can be subjectively attractive on women, not men though JFL if you think that
Looking childlike as an adult man is a death sentence, that Kpop shit is autistic cope

 

[Mastermind]

Cope. Objective attractiveness is a statement about averages. Chad is objectively more attractive than Eugene because Chad attracts the opposite sex to a greater extent than Melvin does. This is an objective claim.

Analogy: Is the statement “mangoes are tastier than sardines” objective or subjective? It’s objective. It’s a statement that the human population on average prefers one food to another. It claims that one food produces a certain signal (interpreted the by brain as “tastes good”) to human brains more so than another food does.

Facts about opinions are facts.

You don't understand they are subjective because one foid I saw walking down the streets yesterday was holding hands with a... Brace yourself... 5'9 dude
Blackpill debunked, looks like being Chad has no benefit after all!

 

[Deleted member 27511]

Fine if you’re black or Korean.

no its not stop believing this cope why is it that this black guy is considered attractive

while he isnt

its almost as though looks are objective regardless of race

 

[Foreverbrad]

no its not stop believing this cope why is it that this black guy is considered attractive
View attachment 2349830

while he isnt
View attachment 2349831

its almost as though looks are objective regardless of race

Cause the second guy is old. It’s not a face bones issue.

 

[Tomboyslayer]

I don’t understand how people don’t see that looks aren’t objective. All you need to do is go outside and see all these nichemaxxed subhumans with girlfriends. Women aren’t nazi eugenicists lmfao

The proof: Blacks and East Asians are “objectively” the ugliest races. Most blacks are recessed with dogshit coloring and bug eyes. East Asians are literally mongoloids. Yet BBCmaxxed and Kpopmaxxed dudes can still get white girls as well as girls of their own race because of nichemaxxing.

What a woman finds attractive is based on cultural factors, then biological reasons. After all, we aren’t living in an age of natural selection, but sexual selection. Both BBC and Kpop are heavily pushed in the western media, so some women, all of which are natural hyperconformists, go with the trend, develop preferences based on their experiences and relationship to media, and subconsciously perceive them as higher value than men of other archetypes.

The same thing happened on a much larger scale with men’s taste in women in the early 2000s. Appealing to the male gaze in the mainstream was being skinny and fit more than being thick and curvy. We saw the trend revert back to thick girls again in the 2010s.

What looks good isn’t timeless or objective, it’s set by cultural factors. Your goal in looksmaxxing should be to figure out your cultural archetype and strategy based on your genetics, desires, and location. If you‘re smart about it, you likely won’t even need to get surgery to slay. Change your style before considering Lefort 3.

MAKE THE TREND TO GET WHITE TALL WOMEN GO FOR SHORT LATINOS I NEED TALL WHITE GF TO CANCEL OUT MANLET GENES I WILL NOT GET LEG LENGTHENING SURGERY I WANT AN AMAZON.

 

[KING REIDYZ]

I don’t understand how people don’t see that looks aren’t objective. All you need to do is go outside and see all these nichemaxxed subhumans with girlfriends. Women aren’t nazi eugenicists lmfao

The proof: Blacks and East Asians are “objectively” the ugliest races. Most blacks are recessed with dogshit coloring and bug eyes. East Asians are literally mongoloids. Yet BBCmaxxed and Kpopmaxxed dudes can still get white girls as well as girls of their own race because of nichemaxxing.

What a woman finds attractive is based on cultural factors, then biological reasons. After all, we aren’t living in an age of natural selection, but sexual selection. Both BBC and Kpop are heavily pushed in the western media, so some women, all of which are natural hyperconformists, go with the trend, develop preferences based on their experiences and relationship to media, and subconsciously perceive them as higher value than men of other archetypes.

The same thing happened on a much larger scale with men’s taste in women in the early 2000s. Appealing to the male gaze in the mainstream was being skinny and fit more than being thick and curvy. We saw the trend revert back to thick girls again in the 2010s.

What looks good isn’t timeless or objective, it’s set by cultural factors. Your goal in looksmaxxing should be to figure out your cultural archetype and strategy based on your genetics, desires, and location. If you‘re smart about it, you likely won’t even need to get surgery to slay. Change your style before considering Lefort 3.

Black and Asians mog south Asian jfl

@Kamui