
MogsMost
Here to help.
- Joined
- Sep 1, 2023
- Posts
- 228
- Reputation
- 389
Looks Determine Intelligence
As we all know, the world is rigged at birth. Beauty is the only passport that matters. The symmetrical face, the lean frame, the glowing skin - these are the arbiters of fate. Before you even speak a word to someone, they have already judged you. Did they hold the door for you? Did they lower their gaze when they saw you? Did they smile back when you smiled at them? The beautiful are granted trust, love, and opportunity without effort. The ugly are condemned to suspicion, ridicule, and invisibility.
This is not opinion. It is the unspoken law of human nature. Looks are destiny. Water.
Beautiful people are often untested by society, and unquestioned in their existence, their presence is enough. They need not think, because they are already desired. They need not strive, because doors are already open. Intelligence is unnecessary when society bends to your appearance. And so their minds sit static in comfort.
Love is a drug, but so is beauty, tt blinds and maims the brain.
This is true of the possessor, the seeker and the observer. (Chad, looksmaxxers AND foids, drooling OVER chad)
Those who are ugly, LTN, sub5, however you describe them, live in a parallel universe. They are rejected before they can prove themselves. They are punished for existing outside aesthetic law. They learn quickly: charm will not save them, kindness will not redeem them, effort will not erase their face. For people like us, who are of average appearance or worse, society FORCES us to work harder than anyone else.
The Paradox
Beauty gifts power but breeds stupidity.
Ugliness inflicts suffering but forces growth.
Why would you ever try to be better if society never forced you to?
This is why chads and stacies in movies are often portrayed as stupid, and why the rare "intelligent" or "emotionally in touch" chad is always the heartthrob of every foid ever. Because niggas like this rarely exist. Society has not forced them to get that far.
The rest of us have our intellect sharpened by necessity.
Looks do not shape opportunity. They shape thought itself. Beauty kills intelligence. Ugliness births it.
There are still some dumb fucks in this community, but I'd say the average intelligence would be higher than almost any other forum on any other topic.
Everyone is here through necessity, suffering and pain.
Getting better is the only option.
Societal Interpretation
This is all rather funny because society has long insisted on a positive correlation between attractiveness and intelligence.
The halo effect ensures that attractiveness is instantly mistaken for mental acuity.
Teachers assume attractive students are brighter.
Employers assume attractive workers are sharper.
Attractive people are more likely to receive compliments, "wow you're so smart"
If you're ugly, you're a nerd.
Just imagine the difference in foid reaction between a chad who knows a lot about WW2 vs an ugly incel. JFL.
Now, provided the LTN has chosen to dwell on .org instead of .is, there emerges the possibility that society has it completely backwards.
We knew this though. We always knew this.
Deep down, the contradiction of society’s judgment has been obvious: those granted everything early rarely grow into anything greater.
This is the exact same reason why trust fund kids tend to blow all their parents money and turn into drug addicts and losers.
Look at families like the Vanderbilts. They built half of America's railroads, 5 generations later, they have NOTHING.
Their family's descendants took their fortune and legacy and reduced it to rubble.
Given everything and never, ever got better.
Those who us who are forced to fight for the scraps of society's affection are emotionally stronger, and in many cases far smarter than our more attractive counterparts.
The Conclusion
Looks are not the only factor that determines intelligence, but being ugly is a major, major incentive to improve yourself mentally, so you can even begin to attempt to compete with others. Being attractive doesn't mean you're not intelligent, and being ugly doesn't mean you're smart, but necessity breeds innovation. Do with this what you will.
Source?
Personal experience, the anecdotes of others.
Oh yeah, and this:
As we all know, the world is rigged at birth. Beauty is the only passport that matters. The symmetrical face, the lean frame, the glowing skin - these are the arbiters of fate. Before you even speak a word to someone, they have already judged you. Did they hold the door for you? Did they lower their gaze when they saw you? Did they smile back when you smiled at them? The beautiful are granted trust, love, and opportunity without effort. The ugly are condemned to suspicion, ridicule, and invisibility.
This is not opinion. It is the unspoken law of human nature. Looks are destiny. Water.
Beautiful people are often untested by society, and unquestioned in their existence, their presence is enough. They need not think, because they are already desired. They need not strive, because doors are already open. Intelligence is unnecessary when society bends to your appearance. And so their minds sit static in comfort.
Love is a drug, but so is beauty, tt blinds and maims the brain.
This is true of the possessor, the seeker and the observer. (Chad, looksmaxxers AND foids, drooling OVER chad)
Those who are ugly, LTN, sub5, however you describe them, live in a parallel universe. They are rejected before they can prove themselves. They are punished for existing outside aesthetic law. They learn quickly: charm will not save them, kindness will not redeem them, effort will not erase their face. For people like us, who are of average appearance or worse, society FORCES us to work harder than anyone else.
The Paradox
Beauty gifts power but breeds stupidity.
Ugliness inflicts suffering but forces growth.
Why would you ever try to be better if society never forced you to?
This is why chads and stacies in movies are often portrayed as stupid, and why the rare "intelligent" or "emotionally in touch" chad is always the heartthrob of every foid ever. Because niggas like this rarely exist. Society has not forced them to get that far.
The rest of us have our intellect sharpened by necessity.
Looks do not shape opportunity. They shape thought itself. Beauty kills intelligence. Ugliness births it.
There are still some dumb fucks in this community, but I'd say the average intelligence would be higher than almost any other forum on any other topic.
Everyone is here through necessity, suffering and pain.
Getting better is the only option.
Societal Interpretation
This is all rather funny because society has long insisted on a positive correlation between attractiveness and intelligence.
The halo effect ensures that attractiveness is instantly mistaken for mental acuity.
Teachers assume attractive students are brighter.
Employers assume attractive workers are sharper.
Attractive people are more likely to receive compliments, "wow you're so smart"
If you're ugly, you're a nerd.
Just imagine the difference in foid reaction between a chad who knows a lot about WW2 vs an ugly incel. JFL.
Now, provided the LTN has chosen to dwell on .org instead of .is, there emerges the possibility that society has it completely backwards.
We knew this though. We always knew this.
Deep down, the contradiction of society’s judgment has been obvious: those granted everything early rarely grow into anything greater.
This is the exact same reason why trust fund kids tend to blow all their parents money and turn into drug addicts and losers.
Look at families like the Vanderbilts. They built half of America's railroads, 5 generations later, they have NOTHING.
Their family's descendants took their fortune and legacy and reduced it to rubble.
Given everything and never, ever got better.
Those who us who are forced to fight for the scraps of society's affection are emotionally stronger, and in many cases far smarter than our more attractive counterparts.
The Conclusion
Looks are not the only factor that determines intelligence, but being ugly is a major, major incentive to improve yourself mentally, so you can even begin to attempt to compete with others. Being attractive doesn't mean you're not intelligent, and being ugly doesn't mean you're smart, but necessity breeds innovation. Do with this what you will.
Source?
Personal experience, the anecdotes of others.
Oh yeah, and this:
“Is There Really a Beauty Premium or an Ugliness Penalty on Earnings?”
Found that once intelligence, personality, and health are controlled, the beauty premium mostly disappears; unattractive people sometimes outperform attractive peers.
(Hu et al., 2021)
Beauty Pays: Why Attractive People Are More Successful
Classic work showing attractive individuals earn significantly more across labor markets.
(Hamermesh & Biddle, 1994)
Cultural differences in the beauty premium
Cross-cultural study showing that the strength of beauty advantages varies significantly across societies.
(Lee et al., 2025)
What is Beautiful is Still Good?
Using AI “beauty filters,” found attractiveness boosts perceived intelligence and trustworthiness.
(Zhang & Chen, 2024)
Attractiveness Bias and Academic Judgments
Attractiveness skewed teacher judgments; conscientiousness was a better predictor of real achievement.
(Talamas et al., 2016)
Perceived Intelligence Is Associated with Measured Intelligence in Men but Not Women
Features like open eyes and smiling increased perceived intelligence.
(Kleisner et al., 2014)
Intelligence and Physical Attractiveness
National UK & US datasets showed a positive correlation between attractiveness and intelligence (up to ~12 IQ points).
(Kanazawa, 2011)
Social Compensation Theory
Individuals exert more effort when disadvantaged or when others contribute less — mirroring how unattractive individuals may compensate with intellect.
(Karau & Williams, 1997)
Can Education Correct Appearance Discrimination in the Labor Market?
Evidence from China: higher education reduces the wage penalty for unattractive individuals.
(Li & Wang, 2024)
Last edited: